Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: Lance Payette speaks and How this would play out in court!  (Read 4940 times)

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2491
Re: Lance Payette speaks and How this would play out in court!
« Reply #10 on: February 11, 2018, 05:37:19 PM »
  (1) Being incapable of supply Details pertaining to Your Posted Source reflects poorly on that Source in addition to You having Blindly proffered said source.

  (2) There is NO Avoiding the Bullet Hole in the JFK Jacket aligning with both the Bullet Hole in JFK's Dress Shirt & the Bullet Hole in JFK 's Back. Your Refusal to address this FACT Immediately renders your "bunching" issue D.O.A.




1. First of all what happened to your sarcastic comments regarding Lance? typical Kook coward. Lance in his above post provided all the details required and if you want to further investigate his life story as verification then as I said he is a member at the Ed Forum, go right ahead.

2. Stop wasting our time, the jacket clearly shows BUNCHING on Elm street which corresponds 100% with the autopsy photos.Try again.



JohnM

Offline Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3420
Re: Lance Payette speaks and How this would play out in court!
« Reply #11 on: February 11, 2018, 09:02:34 PM »



1. First of all what happened to your sarcastic comments regarding Lance? typical Kook coward. Lance in his above post provided all the details required and if you want to further investigate his life story as verification then as I said he is a member at the Ed Forum, go right ahead.

2. Stop wasting our time, the jacket clearly shows BUNCHING on Elm street which corresponds 100% with the autopsy photos.Try again.



JohnM

 (1) Next time research your source. (Embarrassing)

 (2) Running away from the Bullet Hole in JFK's Jacket aligning with the Bullet Hole in JFK's Dress Shirt & the Bullet Hole in JFK's back = Further Embarrassment 

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2491
Re: Lance Payette speaks and How this would play out in court!
« Reply #12 on: February 11, 2018, 09:26:57 PM »
(1) Next time research your source. (Embarrassing)

 (2) Running away from the Bullet Hole in JFK's Jacket aligning with the Bullet Hole in JFK's Dress Shirt & the Bullet Hole in JFK's back = Further Embarrassment


Quote
(1) Next time research your source. (Embarrassing)

Again you fail.

http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/22280-lance-payette/
https://www.lawyers.com/prescott/arizona/lance-b-payette-168127020-a/
https://www.avvo.com/attorneys/86302-az-lance-payette-404013.html
http://pview.findlaw.com/view/1805149_1

Quote
(2) Running away from the Bullet Hole in JFK's Jacket aligning with the Bullet Hole in JFK's Dress Shirt & the Bullet Hole in JFK's back = Further Embarrassment

Yawn! The jacket was bunched! Case Closed!



Btw what happened to your ridiculously pretentious post formatting, why the change? Hehehe!



JohnM

« Last Edit: February 11, 2018, 09:47:05 PM by John Mytton »

Online Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3393
Re: Lance Payette speaks and How this would play out in court!
« Reply #13 on: February 11, 2018, 10:18:46 PM »

Again you fail.

http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/22280-lance-payette/
https://www.lawyers.com/prescott/arizona/lance-b-payette-168127020-a/
https://www.avvo.com/attorneys/86302-az-lance-payette-404013.html
http://pview.findlaw.com/view/1805149_1
H
Yawn! The jacket was bunched! Case Closed!



Btw what happened to your ridiculously pretentious post formatting, why the change? Hehehe!



JohnM

Duncan slapped his wrist about forum formatting a day or two ago

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2491
Re: Lance Payette speaks and How this would play out in court!
« Reply #14 on: February 12, 2018, 12:08:59 AM »
Duncan slapped his wrist about forum formatting a day or two ago



Excellent, like so many other Conspiracy Kooks he's just another sad sack who desperately wants to stand out and be noticed because for all these poor old sods who never did or accomplished anything meaningful throughout their life, this is their last chance.



JohnM

Online John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8329
Re: Lance Payette speaks and How this would play out in court!
« Reply #15 on: February 12, 2018, 11:19:20 PM »
(quoting Lance Payette)
But the point is, the folks in 1963 had the Klein's order coupon in LHO's handwriting, the original postal money order in LHO's handwriting, the post office box application in LHO's handwriting, and solid evidence that LHO had been seen with, practiced with and otherwise handled the rifle that was found at the scene of the crime and determined to have fired the bullets responsible for the wounds.  The Dallas post office clerks did not report the delivery of the rifle - sorry, too bad, but it's irrelevant.  Holmes did not bring the record stub with him when he testified - sorry, too bad, but it's irrelevant.

And when you don't have the facts, make up some stuff that isn't true and call it a fact.

There's no evidence, solid or otherwise that "LHO had been seen with, practiced with and otherwise handled the rifle that was found at the scene of the crime", and there's no evidence that the rifle found at the scene of the crime (actually a building near the scene of the crime) was ever "determined to have fired the bullets responsible for the wounds".  Those are just flat out fabrications.  Not only that, but Holmes was monitoring Oswald's mail because he told the FBI about Oswald's letters to the FPCC.  So the bit about the clerks not reporting the delivery is a red herring.  Who claimed that they should have?  Reported to whom?

As for Mytton's little "top of his head" list, every single thing on there is either false, unproven speculation, or irrelevant to the crime being discussed.  Which is why this list, like Bugliosi's list, is just lawyer rhetoric.  The idea is to do a data dump and try to overwhelm people with a whole bunch of claims and hope that they won't bother to refute them all individually.  Then declare victory.  It's also called the Gish Gallop, named for creationist Duane Gish who frequently uses the technique.  When any single point is refuted, the galloper either ignores the response, just repeats the claim again, and/or makes a whole bunch of other claims without any justification.  Anytime any particular claim in such a Mytton "mountain" is examined in any detail it quickly falls apart like the house of cards that it is.  But then he'll whine that none of that matters because Oswald did it.  So, what's really going on is that he's being a desperate prosecuting attorney, hoping to dazzle his imaginary jury with bullsh*t and hope they can't tell the difference.
« Last Edit: February 12, 2018, 11:39:03 PM by John Iacoletti »

Online Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3393
Re: Lance Payette speaks and How this would play out in court!
« Reply #16 on: February 13, 2018, 02:33:58 AM »


Excellent, like so many other Conspiracy Kooks he's just another sad sack who desperately wants to stand out and be noticed because for all these poor old sods who never did or accomplished anything meaningful throughout their life, this is their last chance.

JohnM

If Duncan wants a certain look to forum formatting he can control to HTML tools more tightly, like Morley's forum. Frankly, Royell seems a little quirky (good for him) and probably can't stand convention.
« Last Edit: February 13, 2018, 02:40:19 AM by Bill Chapman »

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2491
Re: Lance Payette speaks and How this would play out in court!
« Reply #17 on: February 13, 2018, 03:42:09 AM »
If Duncan wants a certain look to forum formatting he can control to HTML tools more tightly, like Morley's forum. Frankly, Royell seems a little quirky (good for him) and probably can't stand convention.





Quote
If Duncan wants a certain look to forum formatting he can control to HTML tools more tightly, like Morley's forum.


Storing didn't use any formatting tools, he just repeatedly pressed the spacebar and that you cannot combat.

Quote
Frankly, Royell seems a little quirky (good for him) and probably can't stand convention.

They all have their quirks and methodology.

Caprio's "you have no evidence"
Weidmann's aggression
Capasse's BS images.
Ray's inability to understand anything image related.
Iacoletti all of the above. LOL
Storing's bizarre formatting AND ODD capitalization.
Ernie's BOLDING
Fratini and Crow ganging up on you.



JohnM

« Last Edit: February 13, 2018, 03:49:56 AM by John Mytton »

Offline Tom Scully

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1630
Re: Lance Payette speaks and How this would play out in court!
« Reply #18 on: February 13, 2018, 05:05:07 AM »
If Duncan wants a certain look to forum formatting he can control to HTML tools more tightly, like Morley's forum. Frankly, Royell seems a little quirky (good for him) and probably can't stand convention.

"More tightly"? In my experience you are comparing apples to oranges.

I have used this forum's software on several of my own websites, in several editions, just as Duncan has.
I hope we can agree that he prefers it, as an off the shelf solution, for at least 8 years on this (jfkassassinationforum.com) site.:
https://download.simplemachines.org/

I have spent time, behind the curtain, on Morley's website. It is a lightly customized version of this.:
https://wordpress.org/download/

From my own hands on experience with both of those comments platforms, Morley's jfkfacts.org is not limited in
the constraint he prefers of comments features and options, but by the secondary nature of the comments module in the
design of the package. It is a blog format. Those with privileged access to create articles have even richer features
than anyone participating here have.

The comments module is bare bones and cannot be enhanced, except as I did with edit privileged access, when I was
comments editor, there.
Example: http://jfkfacts.org/who-was-the-only-man-to-ever-face-legal-charges-in-jfks-assassination/#comment-856847

No admin would grant that level to commenters, and that level is still bare bones, compared to the
forum software we enjoy here.:


« Last Edit: February 13, 2018, 05:07:58 AM by Tom Scully »

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4877
Re: Lance Payette speaks and How this would play out in court!
« Reply #19 on: February 13, 2018, 03:36:51 PM »
But when you get into the level of work that the FBI and Warren Commission did (some of which is truly mind-boggling), and then the review by the HSCA, you realize that the assassination DID receive a close look.  It may be the accepted conspiracy gospel that the Warren Report was a slipshod effort, but that is simply not true,  I have no problem if someone wants to keep looking, so long as it remains within the bounds of sanity.

Nothing related to the Klein's paperwork presented by the Commission was investigated.

This guy is an ignorant nut job.

This guy ( Lance Payette )is an ignorant nut job.


 

Mobile View