Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: Jim Leavelle  (Read 1630 times)

Offline Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 858
Re: Jim Leavelle
« Reply #20 on: September 03, 2019, 06:43:51 PM »
You're a simpleton, and a fool......

I know I will regret asking but what possible beef could you have with Leavelle?  Do you think he was involved in the frame up?  If so, in what capacity?  Maybe painting red circles on the TSBD windows and touching his nose as a double secret signal to LBJ to duck?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Jim Leavelle
« Reply #20 on: September 03, 2019, 06:43:51 PM »

Offline Ted Shields

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 54
Re: Jim Leavelle
« Reply #21 on: September 04, 2019, 05:02:26 PM »
I find it fascinating that if he hadn't have tugged on Oswalds belt its very likely Oswald would've lived and the conspiracy rumours would have been quashed quite quickly.

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3776
Re: Jim Leavelle
« Reply #22 on: September 04, 2019, 08:18:51 PM »
I know I will regret asking but what possible beef could you have with Leavelle?  Do you think he was involved in the frame up?  If so, in what capacity?  Maybe painting red circles on the TSBD windows and touching his nose as a double secret signal to LBJ to duck?

I have the same "beef" with Leavelle that I have with all who framed a poor hapless dupe ......    For your information that railroading of a sucker was very common in Dallas back in the day.....  Henry Wade sent many innocent hapless dupes to prison .

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Jim Leavelle
« Reply #22 on: September 04, 2019, 08:18:51 PM »

Offline Gary Craig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 622
Re: Jim Leavelle
« Reply #23 on: September 04, 2019, 09:44:07 PM »


“I had about 15-20 minutes with Oswald. I didn’t say a word about the President because I had no idea he was involved in that. All I was talking to him about was Officer Tippit’s murder.”

Mr. Stern. He engaged in banter with you and police officials?

Mr. Leavelle. Not with me because I didn't have occasion to question him,
but he did always smile and never hesitated for an answer, always had an answer.



Hmmmm???   Leavelle says he talked to Lee Oswald for about 15 or 20 minutes ......  But..... "I didn't have occasion to question him" .

I believe Leavelle was confused and desperate to confuse others.....

His account of his participation in the investigation of the murders of JFK and Tippit changed over time.

He either lied to the WC and in the contemporaneous reports he produced or he embellished (lied) stories in later years when he became

a minor celebrity, especially to his LNer fan boys.

His exaggerations are in favor of the LN did it official narrative

Offline Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 858
Re: Jim Leavelle
« Reply #24 on: September 05, 2019, 12:30:04 AM »
I have the same "beef" with Leavelle that I have with all who framed a poor hapless dupe ......    For your information that railroading of a sucker was very common in Dallas back in the day.....  Henry Wade sent many innocent hapless dupes to prison .

What was Leavelle's role in the frame up?  Other than expressing his opinion, based on the overwhelming evidence, that Oswald was guilty, he doesn't seem to have done much other than to be presented when your hero was shot.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Jim Leavelle
« Reply #24 on: September 05, 2019, 12:30:04 AM »

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3776
Re: Jim Leavelle
« Reply #25 on: September 05, 2019, 03:55:06 PM »
What was Leavelle's role in the frame up?  Other than expressing his opinion, based on the overwhelming evidence, that Oswald was guilty, he doesn't seem to have done much other than to be presented when your hero was shot.

What was Leavelle's role in the frame up?  Other than expressing his opinion, based on the overwhelming evidence, that Oswald was guilty,

 Other than expressing his opinion[/i], based on the overwhelming trumped up, false evidence, that Oswald was guilty,

Online John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7158
Re: Jim Leavelle
« Reply #26 on: September 05, 2019, 04:38:31 PM »
"overwhelming evidence".  LOL.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Jim Leavelle
« Reply #26 on: September 05, 2019, 04:38:31 PM »

Offline Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 858
Re: Jim Leavelle
« Reply #27 on: September 05, 2019, 07:52:37 PM »
What was Leavelle's role in the frame up?  Other than expressing his opinion, based on the overwhelming evidence, that Oswald was guilty,

 Other than expressing his opinion[/i], based on the overwhelming trumped up, false evidence, that Oswald was guilty,

Try to focus.  You have suggested that Leavelle was involved in the frame up.  So what his role?  I'm not aware of anything Leavelle did that would have advanced the case against Oswald.  But perhaps you can enlighten us.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Jim Leavelle
« Reply #27 on: September 05, 2019, 07:52:37 PM »

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3776
Re: Jim Leavelle
« Reply #28 on: September 05, 2019, 08:12:36 PM »
Try to focus.  You have suggested that Leavelle was involved in the frame up.  So what his role?  I'm not aware of anything Leavelle did that would have advanced the case against Oswald.  But perhaps you can enlighten us.

Leavelle was involved in the framing of Lee Oswald by his perpetration of the lies that were created by the DPD.......

Offline Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 858
Re: Jim Leavelle
« Reply #29 on: September 06, 2019, 12:37:46 AM »
Leavelle was involved in the framing of Lee Oswald by his perpetration of the lies that were created by the DPD.......

What "perpetration of lies" did Leavelle commit other than expressing his opinion that Oswald was guilty?  Many people believe Oswald is guilty.  Are they all involved in the frame up?  I would think that participation in a frame up might involve something a bit more proactive. 

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Jim Leavelle
« Reply #29 on: September 06, 2019, 12:37:46 AM »

 

Mobile View