Jerry,
Yes, that's the Donaldson I was referring to.
I'm still a bit confused by your earlier post:
I was showing the VP and VP Security Cars.
The "Lost Bullet" shows Euins in a location that he is not seen in in the Bell Film. And Donaldson says the limousine (stopped at Z334) is about where the first shot occurred. That doesn't even support Holland's theory.
What do you mean by "stopped at Z334" in the context of what the above-pictured "Patricia Ann Donaldson" and Amos Euins said in The Lost Bullet?
Thanks.
-- Mudd Wrassler Tommy
PS In an earlier post, I got her maiden name wrong. It was "Lawrence," not "Lambert". (since edited)
My bad.
Sorry. Z334 should read Z134. The position in "JFK: The Lost Bullet" where the limousine is stopped for PA Donaldson and Euins to give their comments corresponds to about Z134 (per Dale K Myers). The documentary does not mention that. Where did you think the "Lost Bullet" limousine was stopped for PA Donaldson/Euins?
To get the limousine into position for Holland's first-shot theory, the limousine would have to roll back 1.5 seconds.
Edit:
At 42:19 Euins is standing by "the pillar," pointing to the limo in the background, and agreeing with Holland that that's approximately where the limo was when Euins heard the first shot. (The limo has just passed by the black-and-white "Hwy 80" signs which are clustered on a pole on the "island" and are out of view in the "frame".)
Euins' and Donaldson's statements in The Lost Bullet (as to where the limo was when the first shot rang out) tend to corroborate and support each other.
About all the two "corroborate" is that the limousine at Z134 is about in the
general area when the first shot occurred (Euins: "about where it's at right now" "right as it passed"; PA Donaldson: "approx where - I - the car was in this position when I heard the first shot"). Thing are so vague it could be a second or two after Z134, Earlier than Z134, I don't see so easily.
Holland instead makes it sound like something precise is occurring. Holland claims Euins could locate the limousine "at a specific point in time, just as the president passed a black and white sign" (when he says that, in the background the limousine is stopped where his theory would have it). The only black and white sign Euins ever specifically referenced was the one in 1963 that is presumed to be the Thornton freeway sign. Euins said the car "got near" the sign, not (per Holland) had "passed" it.
And I don't hear Euins say the first shot occurred "just as" the limousine passed the sign cluster. Holland says that. We're not told why Euins is talking about the sign cluster; yes, he is pointing to it, but why? Because Holland said Euins said the limousine had just passed the sign cluster? Sure, Holland would love to have Euins say the first shot occurred as the car passed the sign cluster because that gets the car back to beneath the traffic light sign arm.
Almost like witness tampering? How conservative is Max Holland? Is he getting pointers from Fox News?