Author Topic: How to wipe down your weapon of choice real quick (Read 34648 times)

John Iacoletti · « **Reply #104 on:** October 02, 2019, 05:43:24 AM »

Quote from: Bill Chapman on October 01, 2019, 08:13:46 PM

She saw a package that 'almost touched the ground'
The 34.8" measure qualifies. The 27" measure does not.

According to Randle, it did. Her experiment with McNeely confirmed what she saw. Your thought experiment means nothing.

JFK Assassination Forum · « **Reply #104 on:** October 02, 2019, 05:43:24 AM »

John Iacoletti · « **Reply #105 on:** October 02, 2019, 05:44:36 AM »

Quote from: Bill Chapman on October 01, 2019, 08:17:19 PM

Amateur... you show no proof of the actual measurements

Hilarious. You’ve shown nothing at all. And it wouldn’t even matter if you did. You’re not Randle.

Ray Mitcham · « **Reply #106 on:** October 02, 2019, 09:28:36 AM »

Quote from: Bill Chapman on October 01, 2019, 09:25:20 PM

Let me get this straight: You're the one who can't figure out how to show proof-of-measurement, yet I'm the one who doesn't 'have a clue'.

You're rather dim, aren't you...

Not as dim as a poster who can't post photos of his experiments. Don't tell us, Chappers, show us.

JFK Assassination Forum · « **Reply #106 on:** October 02, 2019, 09:28:36 AM »

Bill Chapman · « **Reply #107 on:** October 02, 2019, 04:14:07 PM »

Quote from: John Iacoletti on October 02, 2019, 05:43:24 AM

According to Randle, it did. Her experiment with McNeely confirmed what she saw. Your thought experiment means nothing.

Thought is definitely involved in everything I do. Randle first estimated a 36" package. Awfully close to 34.8", the only size that almost touches the ground. The 27" length I've marked on my 34.6" device comes 10" from the ground at my 6' height.

Do the math... oh, wait... you don't have a tape measure.

Bill Chapman · « **Reply #108 on:** October 02, 2019, 04:21:03 PM »

Quote from: Ray Mitcham on October 02, 2019, 09:28:36 AM

Not as dim as a poster who can't post photos of his experiments. Don't tell us, Chappers, show us.

One step at-a-time, Sparky:

I've posted a photo of the grip I'm using
None of you have posted a image of the grip that McNeely/Randle used.

JFK Assassination Forum · « **Reply #108 on:** October 02, 2019, 04:21:03 PM »

Bill Chapman · « **Reply #109 on:** October 02, 2019, 04:43:53 PM »

Quote from: John Iacoletti on October 02, 2019, 05:44:36 AM

Hilarious. You’ve shown nothing at all. And it wouldn’t even matter if you did. You’re not Randle.

Thank God. Who would want to be the sister of the poor sap who drove the alleged killer to the (eventual) scene of the crime. Oh, by the way you are not Euins, Brennan, nor Brewer.

Did Randle run up to Oswald with a tape measure? Or did she estimate the size of the bag carried by the (eventual) alleged assassin..

Bill Chapman · « **Reply #110 on:** October 02, 2019, 04:55:03 PM »

Quote from: Otto Beck on October 02, 2019, 04:47:07 PM

The reenactment was done "in accordance with Mrs. RANDLE's observations", sucker.

So what

JFK Assassination Forum · « **Reply #110 on:** October 02, 2019, 04:55:03 PM »

Bill Chapman · « **Reply #111 on:** October 02, 2019, 11:23:12 PM »

Quote from: Otto Beck on October 02, 2019, 05:00:11 PM

The setup and measurements as documented in CE 2008 worked to the SAs satisfaction. Done.

BFD. So Randle okayed McNeely's handling of the package as/per her instructions. But the WC said she was mistaken, and based that conclusion on her statement that the package carried by Oswald was 'almost touching the ground'

JFK Assassination Forum

News: