Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: POLL. Is John Iacoletti right to separate the coupon from the envelope in CE773?  (Read 11124 times)

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3725
Advertisement
Mr. Freeman: Lee was set up
Mr. Oswald: Okay, sure 
As usual...a non-contribution.

JFK Assassination Forum


Offline Zeon Mason

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 913
imo, the conspirators would make use of their expert handwriting forger to write on both envelope and coupon at same table in Fritz office, where the paper bag was placed and Oswald's palm print placed on it while Oswald was in handcuffs and they could force him to touch the paper with one his hands. :)

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
As usual...a non-contribution.

As usual... removing part of my post

Sane people everywhere roll their eyes at you lot

JFK Assassination Forum


Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3725
As usual... removing part of my post
As usual...whining about trivial stuff.
Quote
Sane people everywhere roll their eyes at you lot
SANE people? Then why would you?

Online Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5014
You're joking, right? The President was just killed so they immediately traced the rifle which led to Kleins and the Kliens microfilm led to Hidell's PO Box which was owned by Oswald, Oswald worked in the Depository building and Oswald was also seen killing Tippit, see how this works, detective work is one logical deduction one after another.
All the evidence leads to Oswald.

JohnM

These are just the same lazy contrarians attempting to frame the evidence in the context of an impossible standard of proof to create false doubt.  If all of this evidence doesn't satisfy them that Oswald ordered the rifle, then what could?  Nothing.  It's difficult to conceive how there could be any more evidence of the matter than exists under the circumstances.  It's a minor miracle that so much evidence does exist.  This is just more pointless defense attorney nonsense to defend a guilty client.  Suggest false doubt about everything.  Make no attempt whatsoever to explain the consequences of this false doubt having any validity.  As you asked to begin with, how and why would the coupon and the envelope be photographed together if they were not related?
« Last Edit: July 01, 2019, 03:09:58 PM by Richard Smith »

JFK Assassination Forum


Online Steve M. Galbraith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1443
You're joking, right? The President was just killed so they immediately traced the rifle which led to Kleins and the Kliens microfilm led to Hidell's PO Box which was owned by Oswald, Oswald worked in the Depository building and Oswald was also seen killing Tippit, see how this works, detective work is one logical deduction one after another.
All the evidence leads to Oswald.

JohnM
You're responding to classic conspiracy thinking: evidence that points to Oswald's guilt must actually be evidence of his innocence. Why? Because it was simply too easy to gather.

The more evidence of his guilt is more evidence of his innocence.

The reason Oswald left the building so quickly, the reason he was on the run, the reason he showed no interest in the event, the reason he shot Tippit, the reason he fled into the theater was because he shot JFK. All of those obvious actions indicate flight.

No, to the conspiracy believers it indicates conspiracy to frame an innocent man.

Up is down and down is up.


Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3725
   If all of this evidence doesn't satisfy them that Oswald ordered the rifle ....
Actually...Hidell 'ordered' the rifle. Read the order again.

JFK Assassination Forum


Online Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5014
Actually...Hidell 'ordered' the rifle. Read the order again.

Calling Roger Collins to explain the use of an alias.  LOL.  Yes, Oswald obviously would not order a rifle that he intended to use to commit murder under an alias.  Whew.  Good thing for him that he didn't have a fake ID with that name in his possession!