Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: POLL. Is John Iacoletti right to separate the coupon from the envelope in CE773?  (Read 11125 times)

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4236
Advertisement

Well, for one thing, how would Waldman know how and when this alleged microfilm picture was taken and how it was composed?


Where does this go?, how do you expect a grunt to remember a specific order more than six months later and why do you reckon a question about when the grunt thought he did the work to be of any value whatsoever?

JohnM
« Last Edit: June 27, 2019, 11:51:06 PM by John Mytton »

JFK Assassination Forum


Online John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Where does this go?, how do you expect a grunt to remember a specific order more than six months later and why do you reckon a question about when the grunt thought he did the work to be of any value whatsoever?

Perhaps said grunt could verify that he actually mailed a package to a Dallas PO box via the US postal service since there exists no actual evidence of such.

But a better question might be, why do you reckon a VP reading an FBI provided piece of microfilm and saying what he thinks it might mean is of any value whatsoever?

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4236
Perhaps said grunt could verify that he actually mailed a package to a Dallas PO box via the US postal service since there exists no actual evidence of such.

But a better question might be, why do you reckon a VP reading an FBI provided piece of microfilm and saying what he thinks it might mean is of any value whatsoever?

Quote
Perhaps said grunt could verify that he actually mailed a package to a Dallas PO box via the US postal service...

Why would said grunt have any need to remember in November one specific order that he posted in March who are you trying to convince with this obvious cheap tactic?

Quote
But a better question might be, why do you reckon a VP reading an FBI provided piece of microfilm and saying what he thinks it might mean is of any value whatsoever?

Again nice try, but Waldman sighted the rifle order on the the Kleins microfilm records on the evening of the 22nd which clearly had to be before he gave the film to the FBI.

Mr. BELIN. Was this on Friday evening, November 22?
Mr. WALDMAN. On Friday evening, November 22.
Mr. BELIN. Did the FBI indicate at what time, what period that they felt you might have received this rifle originally?
Mr. WALDMAN. We were able to determine from our purchase records the date in which the rifle had been received, and they also had a record of when it had been shipped, so we knew the approximate date of receipt by us, and from that we made---let's see, we examined our microfilm records which show orders from mail order customers and related papers, and from this determined to whom the gun had been shipped by us.
Mr. BELIN. Are these microfilm records part of your customary recording of transactions of your company?
Mr. WALDMAN. Yes; they are.




Even though after the information about the rifle order was found on the 22nd, the FBI didn't take the microfilm till the 23rd, it's possible that Kleins was taking a copy of the microfilm for themselves for their own bookkeeping and just in case they needed to look up another rifle or baseball bat or hockey stick or weights or whatever that was linked to another murder or simply just to look up a refund? Without their records they're cactus!

Mr. BELIN. Do you know when it was turned over to the FBI?
Mr. WALDMAN. It was turned over to them on November 23, 1963.
Mr. BELIN. Now, you are reading from the carton containing that microfilm. Do you know whose initials are on there?
Mr. WALDMAN. Yes; the initials on here are mine and they were put on the date on which this was turned over to the FBI concerned with the investigation.
Mr. BELIN. You have on your premises a machine for looking at the microfilm prints?
Mr. WALDMAN. Yes.
Mr. BELIN. And you can make copies of the microfilm prints?
Mr. WALDMAN. Yes.


JohnM
« Last Edit: June 28, 2019, 04:02:17 AM by John Mytton »

JFK Assassination Forum


Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3725
Quote
Is John Iacoletti right to separate the coupon from the envelope in CE773?
What does it matter anyway?
A magician could not have made all that 'evidence' appear any faster than the FBI did in one evening.
It was almost like 21st century computer speed in 1963 :-\

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4236
What does it matter anyway?
A magician could not have made all that 'evidence' appear any faster than the FBI did in one evening.
It was almost like 21st century computer speed in 1963 :-\

You're joking, right? The President was just killed so they immediately traced the rifle which led to Kleins and the Kliens microfilm led to Hidell's PO Box which was owned by Oswald, Oswald worked in the Depository building and Oswald was also seen killing Tippit, see how this works, detective work is one logical deduction one after another.
All the evidence leads to Oswald.

JohnM
« Last Edit: June 28, 2019, 04:35:27 AM by John Mytton »

JFK Assassination Forum


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
You're joking, right? The President was just killed so they immediately traced the rifle which led to Kleins and the Kliens microfilm led to Hidell's PO Box which was owned by Oswald, Oswald worked in the Depository building and Oswald was also seen killing Tippit, see how this works, detective work is one logical deduction one after another.
All the evidence leads to Oswald.

JohnM

Oswald started the evidence collection in Irving on New Assassination Eve and the rest stuck to him like post-it notes on practically every step he took thereafter.

« Last Edit: June 28, 2019, 05:22:13 AM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3725
You're joking, right? 
  Serial numbers can be scratched off of weapons ...odd that it wasn't if it was destined to be a murder weapon -starting with the alleged Walker shooting--  Same with pistols. Oh, that's against the law? Give me a break and don't mention that.
Either Oswald left a hundred and umpteen points of 'evidence' behind to play 'catch me if you can' or he got set up.
Well, he got set up.
 

JFK Assassination Forum


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Mr. Freeman: Lee was set up
Mr. Oswald: Okay, sure ::)