Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: Indisputable Evidence for Harvey & Lee  (Read 15925 times)

Offline Sandy Larsen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 25
Re: Indisputable Evidence for Harvey & Lee
« Reply #10 on: February 08, 2018, 10:21:15 PM »
Excellent work Sandy. You don't even need experts. Experts come in all colors.


Thanks Michael.

Offline Sandy Larsen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 25
Re: Indisputable Evidence for Harvey & Lee
« Reply #11 on: February 08, 2018, 10:34:20 PM »
I haven't yet read Harvey & Lee, do your findings corroborate mortician Paul Groody's claims that the head was switched in between 63 and the 81' exhumation?

Robert,

I have no reason to believe that there was any funny business going on with Oswald's corpse. I studied the Norton Report carefully and found everything to be in order with the exception on one of the x-rays. It is obvious that that x-ray came from the other Oswald... the one we call Lee. Of course there was no way for the Norton Panel to be aware of the other Oswald. I'm sure that that one incorrect x-ray raised eyebrows. But it wasn't enough for the Panel to make any other conclusion than the body was that of Lee Harvey Oswald's.

I do agree with the conclusions of the Norton Panel.


Paul McBrearty

  • Guest
Re: Indisputable Evidence for Harvey & Lee
« Reply #12 on: February 08, 2018, 10:44:10 PM »
Robert,

I have no reason to believe that there was any funny business going on with Oswald's corpse. I studied the Norton Report carefully and found everything to be in order with the exception on one of the x-rays. It is obvious that that x-ray came from the other Oswald... the one we call Lee. Of course there was no way for the Norton Panel to be aware of the other Oswald. I'm sure that that one incorrect x-ray raised eyebrows. But it wasn't enough for the Panel to make any other conclusion than the body was that of Lee Harvey Oswald's.

I do agree with the conclusions of the Norton Panel.

How should I put this, oh, THERE WERE NO TWO OSWALD'S. The two Oswald theory is absolute hogwash. Amazing that people are sucked in by this nonsense.

Offline Sandy Larsen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 25
Re: Indisputable Evidence for Harvey & Lee
« Reply #13 on: February 08, 2018, 11:01:56 PM »
While looking for some early Oswald photos it seems that for whatever reason he was reluctant to give a big toothy grin, in fact he mainly covered his top teeth with his top lip.







A habit that followed him into adulthood.







John,

The above photos are all of HARVEY, the Oswald that was exhumed. He wasn't missing any teeth. (Not counting wisdom teeth, which I haven't studied yet.)

It was the other Oswald -- LEE -- who was missing the front tooth. As well as a the molar.


Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2640
Re: Indisputable Evidence for Harvey & Lee
« Reply #14 on: February 08, 2018, 11:05:56 PM »


John,

The above photos are all of HARVEY, the Oswald that was exhumed. He wasn't missing any teeth. (Not counting wisdom teeth, which I haven't studied yet.)

It was the other Oswald -- LEE -- who was missing the front tooth. As well as a the molar.







Do you have any photos of "LEE"?



JohnM

Offline Sandy Larsen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 25
Re: Indisputable Evidence for Harvey & Lee
« Reply #15 on: February 08, 2018, 11:12:44 PM »
Just talked with a Prof of Orthodontics. I just related the basic details of a missing premolar and the relevant ages of the individual no mention of who it was. His answer was emphatic....there is no way that the teeth will restraighten once tipped without application of some device to correct it.

Colin,

Thanks for checking that out with an expert. It only makes sense that teeth don't straighten back up after tipping, as there is no force present to push the teeth back up. In contrast, the opposing teeth -- the top ones in this case -- continue to apply force down on he tipped teeth.


Offline Colin Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1804
Re: Indisputable Evidence for Harvey & Lee
« Reply #16 on: February 08, 2018, 11:17:43 PM »
Colin,

Thanks for checking that out with an expert. It only makes sense that teeth don't straighten back up after tipping, as there is no force present to push the teeth back up. In contrast, the opposing teeth -- the top ones in this case -- continue to apply force down on he tipped teeth.

Apparently it is also force from the teeth "behind" that cause the tipping. Due to imbalance of loss of opposing force "in front".

Happy to assist Sandy.

Offline Sandy Larsen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 25
Re: Indisputable Evidence for Harvey & Lee
« Reply #17 on: February 08, 2018, 11:26:38 PM »

Quote
Quote from: John Anderson on Today at 04:20:22 PM

    You must admit Bill, the whole Harvey and Lee thing is just too much.


I absolutely agree, John.



Bill,

Here's a very simple question for you:

How do you explain that, according to his 1958 dental record, Oswald had a prosthesis (false tooth). But the exhumed Oswald had all natural teeth and no room for a prosthesis?

Offline Sandy Larsen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 25
Re: Indisputable Evidence for Harvey & Lee
« Reply #18 on: February 08, 2018, 11:29:15 PM »
How should I put this, oh, THERE WERE NO TWO OSWALD'S. The two Oswald theory is absolute hogwash. Amazing that people are sucked in by this nonsense.

Paul,

Here's a very simple question for you:

How do you explain that, according to his 1958 dental record, Oswald had a prosthesis (false tooth). But the exhumed Oswald had all natural teeth and no room for a prosthesis?

Offline Sandy Larsen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 25
Re: Indisputable Evidence for Harvey & Lee
« Reply #19 on: February 09, 2018, 12:01:17 AM »

Do you have any photos of "LEE"?

JohnM


Here's one that shows that LEE did smile showing his teeth. (LEE's on the left.)  (Which kinda blows your theory.) In fact, this one looks a lot like the one of him showing the lost tooth when he was younger:





 

Mobile View