Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: Autopsy Photos and X-rays  (Read 1848 times)

Offline Gary Craig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 578
  • The human mind is our fundamental resource. JFK
Re: Autopsy Photos and X-rays
« Reply #10 on: June 24, 2019, 07:36:39 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
The report says the wound was "slightly above" the EOP, which seems to me consistent with palpation and making an unmeasured guess. The only measurement actually made is lateral from the mid-line. The area of the occipital bone above the EOP has no external mid-line. There is, however, a mid-line (or suture line) laterally over from the "cowlick" wound. The Clark Panel determined from autopsy materials authenticated by the Bethesda autopsy doctors that the in-shoot was significantly higher than the EOP.

I think Humes urged a review. Possibly Finck and Boswell told Humes than he had make a serious palpation error and that they would sign-off on the "Military Review" if Humes consented to a new review.

Doesn't Larry Strudivan think the bullet entered the skull near the EOP per Humes' location? I'm pretty sure he's able to make it work with a SN shot.

By "moved" do you mean the autopsy materials the "Military Review" and the Clark Panel saw were fabricated?

The "Military Review" says no materials are missing. They therefore took a picture of the scalp in-shoot only. After the scalp was reflected and the brain removed, they took one view of the interior of the cranium. The skull was severely fractured and I don't think they could just keep reflecting the rear of the scalp to the EOP without pieces falling off.

I wonder why Humes et al keep referencing the bullet entered the skull from behind and somewhat above? I think they may have been comparing the skull in-shoot level with the gaping wound. An entry at the EOP level doesn't work as well as one higher. An angle between an EOP level entry wound to the gaping wound level would best be described as from behind and BELOW.

"The Clark Panel determined from autopsy materials authenticated by the Bethesda autopsy doctors that the in-shoot was significantly higher than the EOP."

The Clark Panel moved the wound 4 inches! 

All three autopsy doctors, who held JFK's skull in their hands, stuck by the EOP location until their deaths.

Where are the photo's?

Do you believe they didn't document the fatal wound's location with photo's?

 

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Autopsy Photos and X-rays
« Reply #10 on: June 24, 2019, 07:36:39 PM »

Offline Louis Earl

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 48
Re: Autopsy Photos and X-rays
« Reply #11 on: June 24, 2019, 09:10:27 PM »
The famous "Brylcreem" photo of the intact back of the head was contradicted by everyone who saw the back of the head in Dallas. 

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1938
Re: Autopsy Photos and X-rays
« Reply #12 on: June 24, 2019, 11:39:15 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
The famous "Brylcreem" photo of the intact back of the head was contradicted by everyone who saw the back of the head in Dallas.

Well actually there were at least two photos of the back of the Presidents head. When two of these stereoscopic photos are combined we see every pixel, skin crease, blemishes, individual hairs and general head shape is correctly depth mapped across both images meaning that both photos were taken of JFK's authenticated head and both show only a single bullet entrance wound.



And as for Dallas eyewitnesses, the very first eyewitnesses to be interviewed only hours later on TV all describe the same damage as seen in the Zapruder film, X Rays, Autopsy photos, etc etc..





JohnM
« Last Edit: June 25, 2019, 12:17:24 AM by John Mytton »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Autopsy Photos and X-rays
« Reply #12 on: June 24, 2019, 11:39:15 PM »

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1043
Re: Autopsy Photos and X-rays
« Reply #13 on: June 25, 2019, 01:40:46 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Well actually there were at least two photos of the back of the Presidents head. When two of these stereoscopic photos are combined we see every pixel, skin crease, blemishes, individual hairs and general head shape is correctly depth mapped across both images meaning that both photos were taken of JFK's authenticated head and both show only a single bullet entrance wound.



And as for Dallas eyewitnesses, the very first eyewitnesses to be interviewed only hours later on TV all describe the same damage as seen in the Zapruder film, X Rays, Autopsy photos, etc etc..





JohnM

         Correction: What you should say is, "both photos were taken of................" the SAME HEAD.   

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1938
Re: Autopsy Photos and X-rays
« Reply #14 on: June 25, 2019, 02:50:05 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
         Correction: What you should say is, "both photos were taken of................" the SAME HEAD.





No, it's always Kennedy. The HSCA did an extensive study on the authenticity of the Autopsy Photos and here is a few examples of their proof;

First of all they measured all the individual facial parts and by using photogrammetric rules they calculated the positions and distances between skin blemishes, creases, ears, eyes, neck, mouth, nose, chin etc.



For instance here's Kennedy's neck creases which line up from front to back.



And we also can see a random mark on Kennedy's back which is repeated in the top down photo.



When the entire set of autopsy photos is examined as a whole, like a jigsaw puzzle each photo has links in other photos.

Btw isn't getting some other guy and performing plastic surgery on him, then blowing his brains out a little extreme?

JohnM
« Last Edit: June 25, 2019, 02:52:29 AM by John Mytton »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Autopsy Photos and X-rays
« Reply #14 on: June 25, 2019, 02:50:05 AM »

Online Ray Mitcham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 716
Re: Autopsy Photos and X-rays
« Reply #15 on: June 25, 2019, 01:01:00 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login


When the entire set of autopsy photos is examined as a whole, like a jigsaw puzzle each photo has links in other photos.

JohnM

But according to the people who took the photos, we haven't seen the entire set.

Offline Jerry Organ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 616
    • Zapruder Frames
Re: Autopsy Photos and X-rays
« Reply #16 on: June 25, 2019, 03:46:28 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
But according to the people who took the photos, we haven't seen the entire set.

So you agree that what we do have is authentic?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Autopsy Photos and X-rays
« Reply #16 on: June 25, 2019, 03:46:28 PM »

Online Ray Mitcham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 716
Re: Autopsy Photos and X-rays
« Reply #17 on: June 25, 2019, 05:35:05 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
So you agree that what we do have is authentic?

No.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Autopsy Photos and X-rays
« Reply #17 on: June 25, 2019, 05:35:05 PM »

Offline Jerry Organ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 616
    • Zapruder Frames
Re: Autopsy Photos and X-rays
« Reply #18 on: June 25, 2019, 05:57:14 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
No.

I'm halfway through "At the Cold Shoulder of History" part of which details James C. Jenkins' belief that the published autopsy photographs were not taken at Bethesda. Here's a fellow who was at the Bethesda autopsy and who has a photographic memory. Says he didn't give the JFK autopsy hardy any thought until receiving an interview request from the HSCA in 1977.

Now he's convinced there was an unattached brain sitting in the cranium when the body was brought in. I guess if he didn't witness firsthand Humes severing the brain stem. it must not have happened.

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1043
Re: Autopsy Photos and X-rays
« Reply #19 on: June 25, 2019, 06:17:39 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login




No, it's always Kennedy. The HSCA did an extensive study on the authenticity of the Autopsy Photos and here is a few examples of their proof;

First of all they measured all the individual facial parts and by using photogrammetric rules they calculated the positions and distances between skin blemishes, creases, ears, eyes, neck, mouth, nose, chin etc.



For instance here's Kennedy's neck creases which line up from front to back.



And we also can see a random mark on Kennedy's back which is repeated in the top down photo.



When the entire set of autopsy photos is examined as a whole, like a jigsaw puzzle each photo has links in other photos.

Btw isn't getting some other guy and performing plastic surgery on him, then blowing his brains out a little extreme?

JohnM

    The discussion centered on the "Brylcreem Photo", and  you then post photos of everything But the Brylcream Photo. It's obvious why.  Is it possible that what you are innocently labeling a, "Random mark on Kennedy's back" = BULLET HOLE?
« Last Edit: June 25, 2019, 06:18:59 PM by Royell Storing »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Autopsy Photos and X-rays
« Reply #19 on: June 25, 2019, 06:17:39 PM »

 

Mobile View