CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?

[Peter Kleinschmidt]

Probably not

 

Nope, Frazier didn't say that he saw LHO bring in a rifle,  he did not say LHO assembled a rifle and also did not say anything about a sniper's nest.  What else you got, anything from the Dirty Brown Shirt handbook of lies?

[Bill Chapman]

Nope, Frazier didn't say that he saw LHO bring in a rifle,  he did not say LHO assembled a rifle and also did not say anything about a sniper's nest.  What else you got, anything from the Dirty Brown Shirt handbook of lies?

Wow

[Michael Walton]

The whole premise of the Lone Nut only case is this...

That 3 shots were fired. The first shot went through his upper back throat and didn't exit came out of this throat and went on to hit Connally.

The second shot just missed wildly, kicking up concrete way down by the underpass and nicking a bystander.

The third hit him in the head throwing his head forcefully toward the rear defying the laws of physics.

That, in and of itself, is a great starting point to argue against the official theoretical conclusions in a court of law by a team of lawyers for the dead defendant.

[Bill Chapman]

He didn’t say “reversed”. Fake quoter!

Well?

[Dan O'meara]

How would I defend Oswald in court?

I'd point out all the lies and deceit in the testimonies of various TSBD employees and make the easy case that there was grounds for collusion beyond the "Oswald the Loner" angle.
It is beyond doubt that some of the employees are lying in their testimonies.
If it was a simple case that Oswald acted alone there would be no need for all these falsehoods.
Everything would be really straight-forward. Innocent folk describing where they were and what they were doing at the time of the assassination.
But that's not what we see.
What we see in the testimonies of quite a few of the TSBD employees is a labyrinthine complex of lies and deceit.

Reasonable Doubt that Oswald acted alone would be one of the easiest arguments to make ever.

[John Iacoletti]

Well?

Well what?  Have you forgotten over the last year and a half it took you to respond to this that you accusing somebody of "fake quoting" you for changing the tense of a word just like that?

[Bill Chapman]

Well what?  Have you forgotten over the last year and a half it took you to respond to this that you accusing somebody of "fake quoting" you for changing the tense of a word just like that?

You're assuming that I saw that post before today.
'Fake quoter' is your term

Now tell us the difference between reversed and reversal.