Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?  (Read 16938 times)

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****

  • This Member Has Made
    A Forum Donation!
  • Posts: 2374
  • 'Pristine', my butt
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #570 on: August 17, 2019, 07:54:58 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I'm not claiming anything.  What makes you think it's a Carcano in the backyard photos?

Define "fake".

 ;)


JFK Assassination Forum

Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #570 on: August 17, 2019, 07:54:58 PM »

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****

  • This Member Has Made
    A Forum Donation!
  • Posts: 2374
  • 'Pristine', my butt
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #571 on: August 17, 2019, 08:19:15 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
If this is not a belief, then what do you call it?

Here, let me demonstrate the word 'believe' in a sentence:

"I believe you've weaponized the word both here and on TAE"

 ;)


« Last Edit: August 17, 2019, 08:59:37 PM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****

  • This Member Has Made
    A Forum Donation!
  • Posts: 2374
  • 'Pristine', my butt
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #572 on: August 17, 2019, 08:42:24 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
What it your source for this quote?

There is no "whole of the evidence".  Just a few weak and circumstantial things that are all questionable, impeachable, arguable, or tainted in some way, and a boatload of speculation and conjecture.

What it your source for this quote?
>>> Huh? You post here as if this was a court of law, yet don't know that basic tenet?
Look it up, 'researcher'.
 
Oswald was the one 'tainted in some way'
He might as well have worn a tshirt saying 'Just Did It'

Everything is arguable to a guy openly demonstrating his contrarianism by using devil's horns on his portrait.

It's the CT Ship of Fools that has the 'boatload full of speculation and conjecture'.
« Last Edit: August 17, 2019, 09:03:40 PM by Bill Chapman »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #572 on: August 17, 2019, 08:42:24 PM »

Online Peter Kleinschmidt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 315
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #573 on: August 17, 2019, 09:17:59 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
What it your source for this quote?
>>> Huh? You post here as if this was a court of law, yet don't know that basic tenet?
Look it up, 'researcher'.
 
Oswald was the one 'tainted in some way'
He might as well have worn tshirt a saying 'Just Did It'

Everything is arguable to a guy openly demonstrating his contrarianism by using devil's horns on his portrait.

It's the CT Ship of Fools that has the 'boatload full of speculation and conjecture'.
You know if the SS would have done their job protecting the President from assassination there would not have been an assassination, so they failed and that means they did not do their job. It also was not their job to take the murdered body of the President out of the State of Texas. Those are facts that justify the speculative theory you are 100% sure probably might have happened or you think perhaps maybe sometimes but maybe never happened

Online John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****

  • This Member Has Made
    A Forum Donation!
  • Posts: 5637
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #574 on: August 17, 2019, 09:24:23 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Why? You're the one using the drawing. And JerryO is the guy who did the drawing if I remember correctly... and am I wrong in recalling you explaining DevAd connection with the horns?

Yes, you are wrong.  Your recollections usually are.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #574 on: August 17, 2019, 09:24:23 PM »

Online John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****

  • This Member Has Made
    A Forum Donation!
  • Posts: 5637
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #575 on: August 17, 2019, 09:26:39 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Here, let me demonstrate the word 'believe' in a sentence:

"I believe you've weaponized the word both here and on TAE"

 ;)

What "weapon"?  You either have reasons for the things you believe or you don't.  If you have any reasons for your "100% sure that Oswald probably did it" belief, you've never actually articulated any of them on this forum.

Online John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****

  • This Member Has Made
    A Forum Donation!
  • Posts: 5637
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #576 on: August 17, 2019, 09:32:20 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
What it your source for this quote?
>>> Huh? You post here as if this was a court of law, yet don't know that basic tenet?
Look it up, 'researcher'.

Why so evasive as to the source of your quote?
 
Quote
Oswald was the one 'tainted in some way'
He might as well have worn a tshirt saying 'Just Did It'

I suppose you consider this "evidence" too...

Quote
Everything is arguable to a guy openly demonstrating his contrarianism by using devil's horns on his portrait.

You sure like to assume things, don't you?  Because of course you do.

What passes for "evidence" in this case is questionable, impeachable, arguable, or tainted in some way because it just is.  The specifics have been discussed at length by people who unlike you actually understand the evidence beyond faulty "recollections" of something they heard somewhere.

Quote
It's the CT Ship of Fools that has the 'boatload full of speculation and conjecture'.

Feel free to name a specific example of me basing a truth claim on speculation and conjecture.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #576 on: August 17, 2019, 09:32:20 PM »

Offline Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 745
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #577 on: August 18, 2019, 04:16:20 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I have no idea what you are talking about

Yeah right, of course you don'tů.

And btw....

So once again you won't clear up whether you posted as Roger Collins.  You obviously would know the answer.  It is truly mystifying that you won't just say yes or no.  The only reason that I can surmise for your reluctance is that Collins claimed to be a lawyer.  And you lied about that as demonstrated in your complete lack of knowledge regarding the legal system. 

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #577 on: August 18, 2019, 04:16:20 PM »

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****

  • This Member Has Made
    A Forum Donation!
  • Posts: 2374
  • 'Pristine', my butt
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #578 on: August 18, 2019, 05:58:04 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Yes, you are wrong.  Your recollections usually are.

You denied calling us 'lemmings'
I caught you out. Remember?

Oswald: 'My Prince, this Iacoletti guy, who has been instrumental in keeping my dream of being remembered for the next 10,000 years alive, is now promoting himself as your advocate'
Satan: 'Nah, he worships me. Even TAE kicked him out. He just sat there looking grumpy and even wore a Tshirt emblazoned with his own name, for Christ's sake.'
Oswald: [SMIRK]
« Last Edit: August 18, 2019, 06:44:38 PM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****

  • This Member Has Made
    A Forum Donation!
  • Posts: 2374
  • 'Pristine', my butt
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #579 on: August 18, 2019, 06:11:52 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
What "weapon"?  You either have reasons for the things you believe or you don't.  If you have any reasons for your "100% sure that Oswald probably did it" belief, you've never actually articulated any of them on this forum.

'weapon' lol

>>> 'Weaponize'

Get in tune with modern-day lingo FFS

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #579 on: August 18, 2019, 06:11:52 PM »

 

Mobile View