Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?  (Read 91811 times)

Offline Peter Kleinschmidt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 485
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #608 on: August 28, 2019, 06:11:46 AM »
Advertisement
You're talking about formal debate
This forum is the Wild West by comparison

Point out what I 'made up' other than clever mockery
You already know and that is why you make up rules as you go along. Do you have every angle covered though?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #608 on: August 28, 2019, 06:11:46 AM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #609 on: August 28, 2019, 06:22:41 AM »
There you have it. Now you are admitting the WC was anything but a courtroom

Point out where I ever claimed the WC a courtroom.

Offline Peter Kleinschmidt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 485
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #610 on: August 28, 2019, 07:04:16 AM »
Point out where I ever claimed the WC a courtroom.
You are only confusing yourself.
You are playing games.
You are terrified of being pinned down.
So being a chameleon is normal for you.
It is just how you adapt.
You are just making a case for Oswald's innocence.
Just as you did when you started weakening your stance to 100% sure LHO Probably did it.
No big deal,
A reversal of sorts.
It is your current trend
One day it's about literal reasoning.
The next day it's about contextual reasoning. 
I hope that helps because I like helping people

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #610 on: August 28, 2019, 07:04:16 AM »


Offline Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2693
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #611 on: August 28, 2019, 07:24:24 AM »
You are only confusing yourself.
You are playing games.
You are terrified of being pinned down.
So being a chameleon is normal for you.
It is just how you adapt.
You are just making a case for Oswald's innocence.
Just as you did when you started weakening your stance to 100% sure LHO Probably did it.
No big deal,
A reversal of sorts.
It is your current trend
One day it's about literal reasoning.
The next day it's about contextual reasoning. 
I hope that helps because I like helping people

Bill Chapman, et al.,

When dealing with obnoxious people like Kleinschmidt in day-to-day life, just make it a habit to say, "That's a suggestion I refuse to accept".

--  MWT  ;)
« Last Edit: August 28, 2019, 07:26:33 AM by Thomas Graves »

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10810
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #612 on: August 28, 2019, 01:34:01 PM »
You're talking about formal debate
This forum is the Wild West by comparison

That doesn’t alleviate you of the responsibility to back up your claims with evidence.

Quote
Point out what I 'made up' other than clever mockery.

Your claim that Oswald was trying to shoot an officer in the theater is just your most recent example. That and your claim that I called you a lemming merely because I quoted one of your posts in a post where I mentioned lemmings.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #612 on: August 28, 2019, 01:34:01 PM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #613 on: August 28, 2019, 06:57:07 PM »
That doesn’t alleviate you of the responsibility to back up your claims with evidence.

Your claim that Oswald was trying to shoot an officer in the theater is just your most recent example. That and your claim that I called you a lemming merely because I quoted one of your posts in a post where I mentioned lemmings.

My claim observation is based on the factual reality of the cops v the NotResistingArrestOswald

You 'mentioned' lemmings LOL
And tell us why you were 'mentioning' lemmings in the first place.
Pray tell, who are are you referring to when you say 'you guys' and who is the guy in your post to me that is following 'other lemmings' off a cliff in your post to me?
« Last Edit: August 28, 2019, 07:01:15 PM by Bill Chapman »

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10810
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #614 on: August 28, 2019, 07:00:30 PM »
My claim observation is based on the factual reality of the cops v the NotResistingArrestOswald. Duh.

What "factual reality"?  The one you don't actually claim to be right about?

Quote
You 'mentioned' lemmings LOL
And tell us why you were 'mentioning' lemmings in the first place.
Pray tell, who are are you referring to when you say 'you guys' and who is the guy in your post to me that is following 'other lemmings' off a cliff in your post to me?

Keep wiggling.  You accused me of calling you a lemming and you have to twist and assume in order to make it say that.  Just like you twist and assume your "factual realities" about the case.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #614 on: August 28, 2019, 07:00:30 PM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #615 on: August 28, 2019, 07:19:46 PM »
What "factual reality"?  The one you don't actually claim to be right about?

Keep wiggling.  You accused me of calling you a lemming and you have to twist and assume in order to make it say that.  Just like you twist and assume your "factual realities" about the case.

Stop squirming and tell us who the 'you guys' you called 'lemmings' (in your post to me) are.
« Last Edit: August 28, 2019, 07:21:08 PM by Bill Chapman »