Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?  (Read 94422 times)

Offline Denis Pointing

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 362
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #576 on: August 20, 2019, 11:42:44 PM »
Advertisement
I did.

Colin, stop stirring the pot for Christ's sake. Aren't things bad enough between those two.  :D :D :D

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #576 on: August 20, 2019, 11:42:44 PM »


Offline Colin Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1860
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #577 on: August 21, 2019, 01:05:21 AM »
Colin, stop stirring the pot for Christ's sake. Aren't things bad enough between those two.  :D :D :D

But I did Denis..... ;D. I assume we are all after the truth.

I also posted this......

Gee Bill, how can every post of yours be better than the next one?

I wonder whether that is as clear to you as it is to most of us.  8)

https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,2031.msg57813.html#msg57813

« Last Edit: August 21, 2019, 01:06:15 AM by Colin Crow »

Offline Denis Pointing

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 362
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #578 on: August 21, 2019, 02:52:55 AM »
But I did Denis..... ;D. I assume we are all after the truth.

I also posted this......

Gee Bill, how can every post of yours be better than the next one?

I wonder whether that is as clear to you as it is to most of us.  8)

https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,2031.msg57813.html#msg57813

Yeah, I saw that one, very clever, very subtle..I wish I'd thought of it first...in fact, I may just pretend I did. To hell with the truth.  :D :D
« Last Edit: August 21, 2019, 02:54:07 AM by Denis Pointing »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #578 on: August 21, 2019, 02:52:55 AM »


Offline Colin Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1860
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #579 on: August 21, 2019, 04:39:14 AM »
Yeah, I saw that one, very clever, very subtle..I wish I'd thought of it first...in fact, I may just pretend I did. To hell with the truth.  :D :D

I can't claim authorship Denis. Not sure where I heard it and whether whoever said it was the originator too. But it is a goodun'  ;D

I think my lemming comment was posted before the last forum crash. But I have to own up. Not sure if John "plagiarised".

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #580 on: August 21, 2019, 05:17:22 AM »

I never called you a lemming.

You talk the talk.
I walk the walk:





You acknowledged that later.
   
« Last Edit: August 21, 2019, 05:21:17 AM by Bill Chapman »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #580 on: August 21, 2019, 05:17:22 AM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #581 on: August 21, 2019, 05:35:55 AM »
I did.

So did John.
And he acknowledged that later.
Yet here he is denying it again 

Careful who you decide to believe, Colin

« Last Edit: August 21, 2019, 05:42:06 AM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2693
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #582 on: August 21, 2019, 06:47:09 AM »
So did John.
And he acknowledged that later.
Yet here he is denying it again 

Careful who you decide to believe, Colin



Someone should explain to Iacoletti that there's an infinite number of Conspiracy Theories, each with its own "fact pattern," but only one Oswald-Did-It-By-Himself scenario.

D'oh

--  MWT  ;)

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #582 on: August 21, 2019, 06:47:09 AM »


Offline Peter Kleinschmidt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 485
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #583 on: August 21, 2019, 07:29:20 AM »
When his arguments get dismantled he resorts to attacking the dismantler.
He takes the easy side of the debate which was all laid out by the framers ( Oswald did it, the cops found a gun) and then wants anyone with an opposing view to prove he's wrong when he is wrong. I bet his posts are typed by someone else while he dictates