CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?

[John Iacoletti]

No worries on the 22nd, Frazier's affidavit said Oswald still had the package under his arm as he entered the back door at the Loading dock.

And since he later said that he couldn’t actually see it, then he just assumed it was there.

Btw the scenario that after they arrived at the TSBD, Oswald took the package and hid it as soon as he could,

That’s a nice scenario. Too bad there’s no evidence for it.

which ironically is exactly what he did at Frazier's house, indicates that Oswald had something to hide therefore this new narrative just makes your client look even more guilty! Congrats!

He hid a package at Frazier’s house? News to me!

Admit it, as far as you’re concerned, anything Oswald did would indicate guilt in your eyes.

[John Iacoletti]

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/testimony/frazierb4.htm
 A 24 inch bag that contained a 40 inch rifle. That is 10 pounds of stuff in a 5 pound bag and Oswald must have hid it in a 2 pound cubbyhole. Speculate away there----

Whatever it takes...

[John Iacoletti]

“Mytton” logic:

Frazier didn’t pay much attention, therefore a rifle was in the bag.

[Bill Chapman]

Whatever it takes...

...to defend Oswald

[Peter Kleinschmidt]

Please don't breed

At all? Or like rabbits?

It doesn't matter, I shoot blanks

[John Iacoletti]

...to defend Oswald

All that takes is you being unable to prove your case.

[Thomas Graves]

Admit it, as far as you’re concerned, anything Oswald did would indicate guilt in your eyes.

Not true, Iacoletti.

"Breaking wind" is a perfectly normal and not necessarily incriminating thing to do from time to time.

Hell, even I have done it once.

(Or twice, absolute max.)

You?  Seein' as how you're so full of beans and everything ...

-- MWT