Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?  (Read 19905 times)

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2435
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #20 on: June 22, 2019, 12:15:48 AM »

You must be unaware of the Turner tests where 7 out of 7 FBI volunteers who tested a Carcano had extensive gunpowder residue deposits on their cheeks after firing the poorly machined Italian rifle...

Cunningham is lying for the government and no Carcano could be fired without making extensive residue as Turner proved...

Very simple...If the actual rifle itself were test fired it would leak extensively...

Quote
....is lying for the government

Geez where have I heard that before? like every day, 50 times a day.

Quote
Very simple...If the actual rifle itself were test fired it would leak extensively...

Since Cunningham didn't destroy the rifle, he would have no idea who could/would test the rifle after him, so to say he lied which would undoubtedly destroy his reputation and lead to his legacy being forever tarnished, just so you can advance some silly conspiracy nonsense is not only ludicrous but offensive.

Quote
tested a Carcano

But not the Carcano.

JohnM

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #20 on: June 22, 2019, 12:15:48 AM »

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2435
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #21 on: June 22, 2019, 12:24:13 AM »
Is that right? You sure, Richard?

Absolutely, not long after Weidmann first started posting both Bill and I independently made posts accusing Weidmann of being Roger Collins, so I gathered all the evidence from Bill, others and myself and made a Poll Thread. The Poll results were dramatically in favour of Weidmann either being Collins or Weidy used a dozen Collins posts as an exact template for his own.

JohnM

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1778
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #22 on: June 22, 2019, 12:42:01 AM »
Absolutely, not long after Weidmann first started posting both Bill and I independently made posts accusing Weidmann of being Roger Collins, so I gathered all the evidence from Bill, others and myself and made a Poll Thread. The Poll results were dramatically in favour of Weidmann either being Collins or Weidy used a dozen Collins posts as an exact template for his own.

JohnM

 ::)


JFK Assassination Forum

Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #22 on: June 22, 2019, 12:42:01 AM »

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2435
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #23 on: June 22, 2019, 12:44:07 AM »
::)

 Thumb1:

No worries Martin, after being discovered you instantly deleted Roger Collins so no harm done, but naughty naughty!

JohnM

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1778
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #24 on: June 22, 2019, 01:07:10 AM »
Thumb1:

No worries Martin, after being discovered you instantly deleted Roger Collins so no harm done, but naughty naughty!

JohnM

How's life in fantasy world, John?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #24 on: June 22, 2019, 01:07:10 AM »

Online Allan Fritzke

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 142
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #25 on: June 22, 2019, 05:40:09 AM »
If I was a Lawyer for the defense, I would call upon Jacqueline Kennedy to take the stand.   She was the only one exempt from sharing her opinion as to where the shots came from.  She obviously was told to not say anything because she was warned that if she voiced what she saw,  the country would have been put in chaos when it realized that a coup had just taken place.

She was not allowed to give her account or statement and she was looking right at JFK when the shots came in!   She would know the direction the shots came in from - grassy knoll or otherwise!    Most people ran up the grassy knoll indicating that it was the likely spot where the sound came from.   The initial reporter on the scene said there was a shot like a firecracker and then 2 shots fired in quick succession.   What little statements she was heard to say were:  "THEY killed him" and "That is not him" - this would indicate that she had a story tell and was muffled.    No one is exempt from testimony when someone else dies and you are a witness!  Pretty simple defense for LHO and the only person not questioned in the entire matter!    The best defense ever!
« Last Edit: June 22, 2019, 05:42:58 AM by Allan Fritzke »

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2748
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #26 on: June 22, 2019, 07:20:15 AM »
Pathetic reply. Could it be you haven't managed to resolve those anger issues yet?

Can't make up your mind?

But you "probably" can, right?

Go ahead, act like an adolescent
At least say something worthwhile


JFK Assassination Forum

Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #26 on: June 22, 2019, 07:20:15 AM »

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1778
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #27 on: June 22, 2019, 11:08:43 AM »
Go ahead, act like an adolescent
At least say something worthwhile

How big was the mirror you were looking at when you wrote that?

Btw your personal attacks and attempts to provoke conflict, rather than taking part in the debate, are getting extremely boring.

Is that worthwhile enough for you?
« Last Edit: June 22, 2019, 11:11:35 AM by Martin Weidmann »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #27 on: June 22, 2019, 11:08:43 AM »

Online Jerry Organ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 708
    • Zapruder Frames
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #28 on: June 22, 2019, 01:56:05 PM »
If I was a Lawyer for the defense, I would call upon Jacqueline Kennedy to take the stand.   She was the only one exempt from sharing her opinion as to where the shots came from.  She obviously was told to not say anything because she was warned that if she voiced what she saw,  the country would have been put in chaos when it realized that a coup had just taken place.

She was not allowed to give her account or statement and she was looking right at JFK when the shots came in!   She would know the direction the shots came in from - grassy knoll or otherwise!    Most people ran up the grassy knoll indicating that it was the likely spot where the sound came from.   The initial reporter on the scene said there was a shot like a firecracker and then 2 shots fired in quick succession.   What little statements she was heard to say were:  "THEY killed him" and "That is not him" - this would indicate that she had a story tell and was muffled.    No one is exempt from testimony when someone else dies and you are a witness!  Pretty simple defense for LHO and the only person not questioned in the entire matter!    The best defense ever!

Dallas prosecutors would be quaking in their cowboys.

Offline Brian Doyle

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #29 on: June 22, 2019, 05:26:37 PM »


Mytton:   Get back to me when you can answer the point...

A testing of the rifle in evidence would prove it leaked residue badly which in turn would prove Cunningham was lying for the government...

JFK Assassination Forum

CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #29 on: June 22, 2019, 05:26:37 PM »

 

Mobile View