Author Topic: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?  (Read 37058 times)

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3585
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #10 on: June 21, 2019, 07:59:27 PM »
LOL.  You would probably get a hung jury.  Half would want to hang Oswald and half would want to hang you.  A change of venue?  What for?  To find someone that didn't know about the assassination?  How about Mars?  That is comedy gold.

That is comedy gold.

Indeed. Your opinions usually are.

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1653
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #11 on: June 21, 2019, 08:11:45 PM »
An insanity defense would not have worked for Oswald.  In a criminal law context, a defendant can be held culpable under the M'Naghten rule if they can distinguish right from wrong (i.e. cognitive insanity).  Even if they are otherwise nuts.  And the most basic way to determine if someone can distinguish right from wrong is whether they took measures to conceal their actions.   There are any number of actions that Oswald took to conceal his intended actions beforehand along with his flight from the crime scene afterward which are all highly indicative of someone who knew they were committing a criminal act.

Yes, I agree. But I think it was still his best chance at avoiding the death penalty, even if it was a very slim chance.

Online Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1407
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #12 on: June 21, 2019, 10:12:02 PM »
That is comedy gold.

Indeed. Your opinions usually are.

You didn't answer my question.  Where would Oswald stand a better chance of acquittal via your idiotic suggestion to change venue?  Did you see that on some TV crime show and thought it sounded good? LOL.  Didn't you once pretend to be an attorney when you first started posting here under a different name?   

Offline Denis Pointing

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 336
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #13 on: June 21, 2019, 10:20:54 PM »
You didn't answer my question.  Where would Oswald stand a better chance of acquittal via your idiotic suggestion to change venue?  Did you see that on some TV crime show and thought it sounded good? LOL.  Didn't you once pretend to be an attorney when you first started posting here under a different name?

Is that right? You sure, Richard?

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3585
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #14 on: June 21, 2019, 10:28:47 PM »
You didn't answer my question.  Where would Oswald stand a better chance of acquittal via your idiotic suggestion to change venue?  Did you see that on some TV crime show and thought it sounded good? LOL.  Didn't you once pretend to be an attorney when you first started posting here under a different name?

Where would Oswald stand a better chance of acquittal via your idiotic suggestion to change venue?

Better chance of a fair trial? ...... Anywhere but Texas, would be my bet. But you had to go and make up the acquittal angle to make a lame point, didn't you?

Didn't you once pretend to be an attorney when you first started posting here under a different name?

And you call my suggestions idiotic?


Let's face it, you have already made up your mind (as per usual) and this entire thread only serves the purpose that you and your ilk can dismiss and ridicule anything being suggested by anybody you, in your narrowmindedness, consider to be a CT.

Preach on, preacher man....
« Last Edit: June 21, 2019, 11:35:28 PM by Martin Weidmann »

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4234
  • 'Pristine'..yeah, sure
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #15 on: June 21, 2019, 11:28:01 PM »
Where would Oswald stand a better chance of acquittal via your idiotic suggestion to change venue?

Better chance of a fair trial? ...... Anywhere but Texas, would be my bet. But you had to go and make up the acquittal angle to make a lame point, didn't you?

Didn't you once pretend to be an attorney when you first started posting here under a different name?

And you call my suggestions idiotic?


Let's face it, you have already made up your mind (as per usual) and this entire tried only serves the purpose that you can dismiss and ridicule anything being suggested by anybody you, in your narrowmindedness, consider to be a CT.

Preach on, preacher man....

"Let's face it, you have already made up your mind (as per usual) and this entire tried only serves the purpose that you can dismiss and ridicule anything being suggested by anybody you, in your narrowmindedness, consider to be a CT"
>>> No, you face it: You've just characterized yourself perfectly.

In my view, you characters, more than anything, don't want to be seen as sheep in a 'nobody-can-tell-us-what-to-do-or-think' paranoid schtick. Can't make up your mind? Not our problem. Grow up.
« Last Edit: June 21, 2019, 11:35:51 PM by Bill Chapman »

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3585
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #16 on: June 21, 2019, 11:33:30 PM »
"Let's face it, you have already made up your mind (as per usual) and this entire tried only serves the purpose that you can dismiss and ridicule anything being suggested by anybody you, in your narrowmindedness, consider to be a CT"
>>> No, you face it: You've just characterized yourself perfectly.

In my view, you characters, more than anything, don't want to be seen as sheep in a 'nobody-can-tell-us-what-to-do-or-think' paranoia.  Can't make up your mind? Not our problem. Grow up.

Pathetic reply. Could it be you haven't managed to resolve those anger issues yet?

Can't make up your mind?

But you "probably" can, right?
« Last Edit: June 22, 2019, 12:06:25 AM by Martin Weidmann »

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2758
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #17 on: June 22, 2019, 12:24:13 AM »
Is that right? You sure, Richard?

Absolutely, not long after Weidmann first started posting both Bill and I independently made posts accusing Weidmann of being Roger Collins, so I gathered all the evidence from Bill, others and myself and made a Poll Thread. The Poll results were dramatically in favour of Weidmann either being Collins or Weidy used a dozen Collins posts as an exact template for his own.

JohnM

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3585
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #18 on: June 22, 2019, 12:42:01 AM »
Absolutely, not long after Weidmann first started posting both Bill and I independently made posts accusing Weidmann of being Roger Collins, so I gathered all the evidence from Bill, others and myself and made a Poll Thread. The Poll results were dramatically in favour of Weidmann either being Collins or Weidy used a dozen Collins posts as an exact template for his own.

JohnM

 ::)


Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2758
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #19 on: June 22, 2019, 12:44:07 AM »
::)

 Thumb1:

No worries Martin, after being discovered you instantly deleted Roger Collins so no harm done, but naughty naughty!

JohnM

 

Mobile View