Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: The number one CT nightmare question ...  (Read 17375 times)

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: The number one CT nightmare question ...
« Reply #88 on: June 25, 2019, 10:28:04 PM »
Advertisement
Would you care to enumerate the evidence that gave the police probable cause to arrest him for murder at the time of his arrest?

1) Lee Harvey Occam-Oswald
2) [SEE ABOVE]

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The number one CT nightmare question ...
« Reply #88 on: June 25, 2019, 10:28:04 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: The number one CT nightmare question ...
« Reply #89 on: June 25, 2019, 11:29:39 PM »
Brennan's description of Oswald that was nearly identical with the Police radio broadcast at about 12:45 is powerful corroborating evidence for Brennan's eventual positive identification of Oswald.

"nearly identical".  LOL.

Quote
Oswald sat on the ledge.

Brennan said "at the time that he was firing the gun".

Quote
Evidence has to be examined and removed, it's one of the job descriptions.

Does evidence have to be examined and then thrown back on the floor for pictures to be taken?

Quote
The bag was seen and testified as being in the sniper's nest by six Police officers.

Yes, in different locations and folded in different ways, and none of them were in the sniper's nest before Studebaker and Day went on their excursion to the wrapping station to get "samples".

Quote
At first Givens was just trying to cover his own ass and in time he was asked more questions and gave more detailed answers. And didn't Givens see Oswald half an hour before the assassination, BFD!




Quote
Which shows that Oswald's palm touched the actual rifle, good luck arguing that one.

No, it shows that Latona thought a partial print on an index card that arrived a week later matched Oswald.

Quote
LOL! That's it? That's how you plan on taking the rifle out of Oswald's hands! Hehehe.

"We don't have any proof that Oswald fired the rifle, and never did.  Nobody's yet been able to put him in that building with a gun in his hand." -- Jesse Curry

Quote
And the only way you "found" out about this evidence of the Police finding stuff is because the Police told you? Is this your definition of tainted? Hahaha!

Even dishonest cops can trip themselves up.  And often do.
« Last Edit: June 25, 2019, 11:30:44 PM by John Iacoletti »

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: The number one CT nightmare question ...
« Reply #90 on: June 25, 2019, 11:30:06 PM »
1) Lee Harvey Occam-Oswald
2) [SEE ABOVE]

Yeah, that's what I thought.

 :D

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The number one CT nightmare question ...
« Reply #90 on: June 25, 2019, 11:30:06 PM »


Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4236
Re: The number one CT nightmare question ...
« Reply #91 on: June 25, 2019, 11:33:54 PM »
"nearly identical".  LOL.

Brennan said "at the time that he was firing the gun".

Does evidence have to be examined and then thrown back on the floor for pictures to be taken?

Yes, in different locations and folded in different ways, and none of them were in the sniper's nest before studebaker and Day went on their excursion to the wrapping station to get "samples".




No, it shows that Latona thought a partial print on an index card that arrived a week later matched Oswald.

"We don't have any proof that Oswald fired the rifle, and never did.  Nobody's yet been able to put him in that building with a gun in his hand." -- Jesse Curry

Even dishonest cops can trip themselves up.  And often do.

WOW!

So in this short post we have even more liars, Brennan, Fritz, Day, Givens, etc etc, it never ends.

What an extreme way to build a case but at least you're convincing yourself?

JohnM


Offline Jorn Frending

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 59
Re: The number one CT nightmare question ...
« Reply #92 on: June 25, 2019, 11:54:05 PM »
You haven't shown that in any way whatsoever.  You've just speculated on what you thought conspirators would do.

It's called "ANALYZING"  :)

It's been done in order to narrow down options based on the frequent CT premise that Oswald was framed according to a carefully elaborated plan being "OBLIVIOUS" of anything strange to take place that day.

Both CT's and LN's alike have contributed greatly to this thread and so far nobody has been able to refute the idea that Oswald could not have been framed had he not carried out some kind of planned voluntary action knowingly or not of the consequences.

However, if you do not agree, you are welcome to offer an alternative theory.

In any case the conclusion still allows for having a CT point of view ...

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The number one CT nightmare question ...
« Reply #92 on: June 25, 2019, 11:54:05 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: The number one CT nightmare question ...
« Reply #93 on: June 26, 2019, 12:14:58 AM »
WOW!

So in this short post we have even more liars, Brennan, Fritz, Day, Givens, etc etc, it never ends.

What an extreme way to build a case but at least you're convincing yourself?

No, I'm just pointing out that the actual evidence doesn't support the claims that you continue to make about it.  If you find "cop said so" to be compelling evidence then you should take Chief Curry's word for it.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: The number one CT nightmare question ...
« Reply #94 on: June 26, 2019, 12:19:33 AM »
It's called "ANALYZING"  :)

It's been done in order to narrow down options based on the frequent CT premise that Oswald was framed according to a carefully elaborated plan being "OBLIVIOUS" of anything strange to take place that day.

If this premise is so frequent, then can you cite a single example of it being made on this forum?

Quote
Both CT's and LN's alike have contributed greatly to this thread and so far nobody has been able to refute the idea that Oswald could not have been framed had he not carried out some kind of planned voluntary action knowingly or not of the consequences.

So you're asking the participants here to prove a negative?  Isn't that special?

Quote
However, if you do not agree, you are welcome to offer an alternative theory.

Actually what I'd like to see is you making an actual case that Oswald could not have been framed had he not carried out some kind of planned voluntary action, rather than just stating it as an axiom and demanding that it be disproven.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The number one CT nightmare question ...
« Reply #94 on: June 26, 2019, 12:19:33 AM »


Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4236
Re: The number one CT nightmare question ...
« Reply #95 on: June 26, 2019, 12:20:53 AM »
If you find "cop said so" to be compelling evidence then you should take Chief Curry's word for it.

Curry said in his book that there was enough evidence to charge Oswald with the Murder of Officer Tippit.
And as for what else Curry said, maybe you can find the passage in his book that supports your statement?

JohnM