Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: The number one CT nightmare question ...  (Read 16816 times)

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10810
Re: The number one CT nightmare question ...
« Reply #96 on: June 26, 2019, 12:27:23 AM »
Advertisement
Curry said in his book that there was enough evidence to charge Oswald with the Murder of Officer Tippit.
And as for what else Curry said, maybe you can find the passage in his book that supports your statement?

Not in his book.  The quote is from a November 6, 1969 Dallas Morning News article by Tom Johnson.


JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The number one CT nightmare question ...
« Reply #96 on: June 26, 2019, 12:27:23 AM »


Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4236
Re: The number one CT nightmare question ...
« Reply #97 on: June 26, 2019, 12:28:55 AM »
Not in his book.  The quote is from a November 6, 1969 Dallas Morning News article by Tom Johnson.

Oh, it's hearsay, no worries.

JohnM

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10810
Re: The number one CT nightmare question ...
« Reply #98 on: June 26, 2019, 12:36:25 AM »
Oh, it's hearsay, no worries.

Not if Curry said it directly to Johnson.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The number one CT nightmare question ...
« Reply #98 on: June 26, 2019, 12:36:25 AM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: The number one CT nightmare question ...
« Reply #99 on: June 29, 2019, 05:43:20 AM »

Offline Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 833
Re: The number one CT nightmare question ...
« Reply #100 on: June 30, 2019, 08:58:22 PM »
Nothing has changed here I see. The LNers are still totally focused on Oswald's guilt as a lone nut. But they're actually anti-CTers and there was NO CONSPIRACY to see here so move along! Conspiracy theorists are just tin-foil hat kooks, after all.

So if Oswald was not a lone nut shooter then the LNers' world goes kaput. But there are a few problems with that. Firstly, it is highly unlikely that Oswald could have disassembled then reassembled the rifle without leaving a single print on it. Secondly, it is highly unlikely that Oswald could have pulled off the head shot when the scope on his rifle was grossly misaligned. Thirdly, there is not a valid 3rd shot ballistic trajectory from the 6th floor of the TSBD, into JFK's back and out his throat at his location, otherwise, show us what that trajectory looks like. Fourthly, the magic bullet showing up on the wrong stretcher in pristine condition speaks for itself. Lastly, the 3rd shot could not have come from the MC because it exploded in JFK's head, which a full-metal jacketed bullet doesn't do. How much more do you LNers need to doubt that this was a conspiracy?

Conclusion: Oswald likely didn't fire a shot, therefore he must have been a patsy, which means this was a conspiracy. Given this premise, LNers need to free their minds, use some critical thinking and apply some logic to reach the same conclusions to see how this all must have played out.
« Last Edit: June 30, 2019, 09:00:26 PM by Jack Trojan »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The number one CT nightmare question ...
« Reply #100 on: June 30, 2019, 08:58:22 PM »


Offline Denis Pointing

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 362
Re: The number one CT nightmare question ...
« Reply #101 on: June 30, 2019, 11:46:35 PM »
Nothing has changed here I see. The LNers are still totally focused on Oswald's guilt as a lone nut. But they're actually anti-CTers and there was NO CONSPIRACY to see here so move along! Conspiracy theorists are just tin-foil hat kooks, after all.

So if Oswald was not a lone nut shooter then the LNers' world goes kaput. But there are a few problems with that. Firstly, it is highly unlikely that Oswald could have disassembled then reassembled the rifle without leaving a single print on it. Secondly, it is highly unlikely that Oswald could have pulled off the head shot when the scope on his rifle was grossly misaligned. Thirdly, there is not a valid 3rd shot ballistic trajectory from the 6th floor of the TSBD, into JFK's back and out his throat at his location, otherwise, show us what that trajectory looks like. Fourthly, the magic bullet showing up on the wrong stretcher in pristine condition speaks for itself. Lastly, the 3rd shot could not have come from the MC because it exploded in JFK's head, which a full-metal jacketed bullet doesn't do. How much more do you LNers need to doubt that this was a conspiracy?

Conclusion: Oswald likely didn't fire a shot, therefore he must have been a patsy, which means this was a conspiracy. Given this premise, LNers need to free their minds, use some critical thinking and apply some logic to reach the same conclusions to see how this all must have played out.

In other words, anyone that hasn't reached the same conclusion as you must be flawed in some way.   :D :D  What an obnoxious, arrogant fool you are.

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3725
Re: The number one CT nightmare question ...
« Reply #102 on: July 01, 2019, 01:13:27 AM »
In other words, anyone that hasn't reached the same conclusion as you must be flawed in some way. What an obnoxious, arrogant fool you are.
Is that what this forum has come to...calibrated viscous snipes? There was nothing obnoxious arrogant or foolish in the post. There wasn't anything stated there that hasn't been stated many times before.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The number one CT nightmare question ...
« Reply #102 on: July 01, 2019, 01:13:27 AM »


Offline Jorn Frending

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 59
Re: The number one CT nightmare question ...
« Reply #103 on: April 03, 2020, 08:21:32 PM »
Hello again dear forum members!

I admit to staying off the forum for often longer periods of time as many of us do  :)

I would like to know if there are still CT's who believe that Oswald could be TOTALLY innocent and could have been set up as a patsy without his whereabouts being controlled.

Would a big scale conspiracy allow for the possibility of Oswald being anywhere without his whereabouts being controlled also in the case of the Tipping shooting?

CT's should take this into consideration when elaborating on any theory as explained in the first post in this thread ...