CT's, how did Oswald's rifle end up on the 6th floor?

[Walt Cakebread]

I proved that it wasn't, without shenanigans. But if you'd like to try pulling your own shenanigans, I'll gladly wait. Just don't forget to provide photo evidence that can debunk mine. And good luck with that. 

In the mean time, what else might Oswald swallower try to say...? "But Oswald's finger prints were found on the boxes."

Ah yes, you mean his finger prints were found where he worked... handling boxes? Well then... that certainly spells out his guilt. Just what kind of dumb ass cops & FBI agents were on the case? How stupid obvious was the frame up in this situation... let's just have a look at real shenanigans.

So the police search for finger prints to id an assassin. Why was Oswald, an employee, the only possible suspect? Isn't there something wrong with that picture?

One obvious problem is that finger prints couldn't be identified in 1 day, because they didn't have computer systems capable of that. And yet Oswald was identified  as the suspect in less than hour. How could the cops in 1963 have done enough police work to positively ID Oswald, AN EMPLOYEE, as the only suspect? Does that make sense to anyone?

How many other possible suspects were there? How about everyone who worked there for starters. And yet they only zeroed in on Oswald. Why is that?

Page 249 of the WCR claims:

In addition to Oswald's print, a total of 25 identifiable prints were found on 4 boxes near the window of the 6th floor.

The Commission determined that none of the warehouse employees who might have customarily handled the boxes left prints which could be identified.

SAY WHAT?? READ THAT AGAIN! NONE OF THE OTHER EMPLOYEES WHO HANDLED THE BOXES LEFT PRINTS THAT COULD BE IDENTIFIED!

So even though Oswald was an employee too, who also handled boxes, none of the other employees left finger prints that could be identified, except him. And no one thought to question that? You'd have to be a special kind of stupid to buy that. But for the cops and FBI to buy it too?  Let's continue. Same page.

All but 1 of the 25 definitely identifiable prints were the prints of 2 persons--an FBI employee and a member of the Dallas Police Department.

HOLY spombleprofglidnoctobuns!! LET'S READ THAT AGAIN! BECAUSE 24 OF THE 25 PRINTS ALL BELONGED TO 1 FBI AGENT & 1 COP.

One identifiable palmprint was not identified.  Say what?  READ IT AGAIN! ONE IDENTIFIABLE PRINT WAS NOT IDENTIFIED.  Well... why not?

Why would the police & FBI fail to pursue the identify of an unknown print at a crime scene? Which part of that isn't stupid as all hell? That shouldn't make sense to anyone with the slightest bit of common sense? Because that means there was a possible suspect, besides Oswald. How do they know he wasn't working with anyone? Wasn't important enough to find out? How the hell could the FBI & Police not care about that?

Unless they were the ones framing Oswald.  Is that a possibility? Look at my evidence for the 2 rifles. Not only was it possible, it's exactly what happened. And you don't have to be a rocket scientist to figure that out. You just have to stop swallowing all the nonsensical bullspombleprofglidnoctobuns that doesn't make any sense at all.

You're right....Lee Oswald was simply a patsy who was used and framed by Hoover's "Extra Special" agents, but your theory that the rifle serial number is a forgery is unconvincing.

[Zeon Mason]

I do not really understand how a fingerprint can be examined by Nathan Darby an expert with 30 plus years of experience, found to be a match to Malcolm Wallace with 34 pets and the dismissed by a few points of dissimilarity

[Peter Kleinschmidt]

That must be true because you just said so

Bill, John does not really believe Oswald was innocent, he actually is upset that the WC= all men

[Bill Chapman]

Bill, John does not really believe Oswald was innocent, he actually is upset that the WC= all men

OMG

[Jack Nessan]

Exactly! If it really was the murder weapon there wouldn't have been a need to change the serial number on 1 of the 2 rifles used as evidence with the same serial numbers.  And for anyone who doesn't seem to understand what I'm talking about, or still can't fathom the fact there's 2 different rifles, both claimed as the one murder weapon, let's make it easy.

In typography there are two different typesets for fonts. One is called "Serif" and the other is called "San-serif." Serif fonts have extra lines attached to the ends, like Times Roman for example. San-serif do not.

One rifle claimed to be the murder weapon uses Serif for the letter "C".  The other does not. How can the "C" be different if there's only one murder weapon? It can't. Which is 100% proof of a manufactured murder weapon. But why would they need to manufacture a murder weapon? Because one of the rifles was serial number C-2763, and the FBI turned the last "3" into a "6".

But don't take my word for it, see for yourselves.



Here's a link in case the photo doesn't show.  https://photos.app.goo.gl/BUs7vcsw5nE7m7PB9


And if that still isn't enough to convince some of the harder head people who don't care about the truth and just wanna be right... here's more evidence that the 6th floor rifle wasn't the same as the one from the backyard photo.



And link just in case...  https://photos.app.goo.gl/TDJV9V4x91uVZSho6



Backyard Rifle: Nylon sling with no pad - sling clips on bottom of furniture vs TBD Rifle: Leather sling with pad - sling clips on side of furniture



https://photos.app.goo.gl/DouJkWUHsnZfdRBG9


Do the math, because it isn't rocket science. Evidence of two different rifles = 100% frame up.

That's checkmate for anyone silly enough to continue arguing a moot fact.


And just for spombleprofglidnoctobunss & giggles, here's more proof Oswald was framed.

Nov 20, 1963 (Wed), Ralph Yates picked up a hitch-hiker who was carrying a 4-1/2 ft long package that he said contained “curtain rods”. This man asked Yates if he though a man could be shot from a window in a tall building. The young man then showed Yates a photograph of a man holding a rifle and asked Yates if he thought the President could be killed with an identical rifle. The man then asked Yates if he knew the President's parade route, and then asked Yates to drop him off at Elm and Houston (TSBD).  (LEE HARVEY OSWALD was working at the TSBD that entire day).

Explain that!

They numbers and letters look the same. The white highlighting is a little deceiving. 

The other picture you can see the stamp on the receiver of the rifle in both pictures.

The bullet and bullet fragments were matched to the rifle found on the sixth floor. You believe the assassin still used a carcano but it was just a different carcano?

[Walt Cakebread]

They numbers and letters look the same. The white highlighting is a little deceiving. 

The other picture you can see the stamp on the receiver of the rifle in both pictures.

The bullet and bullet fragments were matched to the rifle found on the sixth floor. You believe the assassin still used a carcano but it was just a different carcano?

They numbers and letters look the same. The white highlighting is a little deceiving. 

Yes, I believe that you are right.    The major problem with the theory of stamping another barrel with the number C 2766 and fitting that barrel to a Carcano to create a forgery is the fact that the forgers would need the original rifle at hand so they could place each character in precisely the correct position on the new barrel.   And if they had the original in their hands ......Then why create a forgery???

The bullet and bullet fragments were matched to the rifle found on the sixth floor.

I know that the FBI "CLAIMED" that the unbelievable, nearly pristine, bullet ( CE 399) was fired through the barrel of the carcano with the serial number C2766 ....And that is possible true....BUT there is no way to determine WHEN that projectile was fired from C 2766.

And anybody who believes that the small fragments could be matched to the barrel of any specific gun is an ignorant damned fool.

[John Iacoletti]

Bill, John does not really believe Oswald was innocent, he actually is upset that the WC= all men

I'm sure that if any women had been on the WC, you'd denigrate them.  Black people too.

[John Iacoletti]

The bullet and bullet fragments were matched to the rifle found on the sixth floor.

You mean the bullet allegedly found on an unrelated stretcher at Parkland hospital that you cannot show was even involved in the assassination?