Author Topic: Buell's "off" day (aka: oh yeah) (Read 13455 times)

John Iacoletti · « **Reply #48 on:** May 30, 2019, 06:29:05 PM »

Quote from: Charles Collins on May 30, 2019, 05:38:12 PM

That isn't what I said.

It most certainly is. This is what you said:

Quote from: Charles Collins on May 29, 2019, 08:16:44 PM

The context is a sworn affidavit of 11/22/63 stating clearly that he "did not see LHO after about 11:00 AM today." That is either true or a lie. If it is true then his statement in the 7/13/2013 interview is a lie. And if the affidavit is not true, then it is a lie. Either way he is a liar.

What you never explained is why you are assuming a non-truth must be a "blatant and intentional lie".

JFK Assassination Forum · « **Reply #48 on:** May 30, 2019, 06:29:05 PM »

Charles Collins · « **Reply #49 on:** May 30, 2019, 06:52:37 PM »

Quote from: John Iacoletti on May 30, 2019, 06:29:05 PM

It most certainly is. This is what you said:

What you never explained is why you are assuming a non-truth must be a "blatant and intentional lie".

You are generalizing. I am specifically talking about this case.

John Iacoletti · « **Reply #50 on:** May 30, 2019, 07:10:56 PM »

Quote from: Charles Collins on May 30, 2019, 05:34:31 PM

I stand corrected. Coming from the direction of the rear exit is what I was thinking. Thanks for the correction.

JFK Assassination Forum · « **Reply #50 on:** May 30, 2019, 07:10:56 PM »

John Iacoletti · « **Reply #51 on:** May 30, 2019, 07:13:41 PM »

Quote from: Charles Collins on May 30, 2019, 06:52:37 PM

You are generalizing. I am specifically talking about this case.

Why are you equivocating? What about this specific case enables you to determine that Frazier was ""blatantly and intentionally lying"?

Charles Collins · « **Reply #52 on:** May 30, 2019, 07:20:36 PM »

Quote from: John Iacoletti on May 30, 2019, 07:13:41 PM

Why are you equivocating? What about this specific case enables you to determine that Frazier was ""blatantly and intentionally lying"?

What makes you think that he wasn’t?

JFK Assassination Forum · « **Reply #52 on:** May 30, 2019, 07:20:36 PM »

John Iacoletti · « **Reply #53 on:** May 30, 2019, 07:31:16 PM »

Quote from: Charles Collins on May 30, 2019, 07:20:36 PM

What makes you think that he wasn’t?

You're the one who made the claim -- stop trying to shift the burden. I agree with you that at face value, one of those statements has to be untrue. It doesn't necessarily follow that one of those statements is a "blatant and intentional lie".

John Mytton · « **Reply #54 on:** May 30, 2019, 07:51:05 PM »

Quote from: John Iacoletti on May 30, 2019, 07:31:16 PM

It doesn't necessarily follow that one of those statements is a "blatant and intentional lie".

Yeah, kinda like Marina's statements, huh?

JohnM

JFK Assassination Forum · « **Reply #54 on:** May 30, 2019, 07:51:05 PM »

Charles Collins · « **Reply #55 on:** May 30, 2019, 07:57:55 PM »

Quote from: John Iacoletti on May 30, 2019, 07:31:16 PM

You're the one who made the claim -- stop trying to shift the burden. I agree with you that at face value, one of those statements has to be untrue. It doesn't necessarily follow that one of those statements is a "blatant and intentional lie".

Liar = teller of untruths

blatant = obvious

intentional = knowing

Which of these do you not understand?

Edit:

I backed up my claim with evidence (affidavit and video of interview). That seems to sufficient to everyone but you. If you are claiming that my claim is wrong. Then at least tell me what the heck you think is wrong with it.

JFK Assassination Forum

News: