Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: The opinions of witnesses  (Read 488 times)

Offline Joe Mannix

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 39
The opinions of witnesses
« on: September 13, 2019, 12:52:44 AM »
People who viewed the assassination prior to the Warren Report.  These are the opinions I value. Not a lawyers interpretation of their opinion. Thank God for Mark Lane.







« Last Edit: September 13, 2019, 12:57:20 AM by Joe Mannix »

JFK Assassination Forum

The opinions of witnesses
« on: September 13, 2019, 12:52:44 AM »

Offline Ted Shields

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 58
Re: The opinions of witnesses
« Reply #1 on: September 13, 2019, 10:28:28 AM »
Mark Lane. Urgh. Coached and handpicked witnesses, selectively chosen for his own agenda.

He has blood on his hands in Jonestown too but thats for another day.

Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2119
Re: The opinions of witnesses
« Reply #2 on: September 13, 2019, 11:37:01 AM »
Mark Lane. Urgh. Coached and handpicked witnesses, selectively chosen for his own agenda.

He has blood on his hands in Jonestown too but thats for another day.

Coached and handpicked witnesses, selectively chosen for his own agenda.

How is that any different from what the WC did?

Lane was a defense attorney, much like the WC was a prosecutorial body!

Important is what the witnesses have to say. You can hear them speak directly, rather than having to accept the WC's version of what their witnesses said....




JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The opinions of witnesses
« Reply #2 on: September 13, 2019, 11:37:01 AM »

Offline Ted Shields

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 58
Re: The opinions of witnesses
« Reply #3 on: September 13, 2019, 01:00:18 PM »
Coached and handpicked witnesses, selectively chosen for his own agenda.

How is that any different from what the WC did?

Lane was a defense attorney, much like the WC was a prosecutorial body!

Important is what the witnesses have to say. You can hear them speak directly, rather than having to accept the WC's version of what their witnesses said....

Heavily edited though.

Look at this an example on how to lead a witness.

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/lane1.txt

Rush to Judgement was the first book I ever read on the subject years ago. And its a crock.

Of all the researchers, Mark Lane is the worst.

His behaviour in Jonestown is unforgivable.

Offline Gary Craig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 623
Re: The opinions of witnesses
« Reply #4 on: September 13, 2019, 04:39:20 PM »
People who viewed the assassination prior to the Warren Report.  These are the opinions I value. Not a lawyers interpretation of their opinion. Thank God for Mark Lane.

~snip~


 Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1:

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The opinions of witnesses
« Reply #4 on: September 13, 2019, 04:39:20 PM »

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7225
Re: The opinions of witnesses
« Reply #5 on: September 13, 2019, 07:38:07 PM »
Look at this an example on how to lead a witness.

Here’s another example on how to lead a witness:

Mr. BALL. Did you recognize anyone in the lineup?
Mrs. MARKHAM. No, sir.
Mr. BALL. You did not? Did you see anybody--I have asked you that question before did you recognize anybody from their face?
Mrs. MARKHAM. From their face, no.
Mr. BALL. Did you identify anybody in these four people?
Mrs. MARKHAM. I didn't know nobody.
Mr. BALL. I know you didn't know anybody, but did anybody in that lineup look like anybody you had seen before?
Mrs. MARKHAM. No. I had never seen none of them, none of these men.
Mr. BALL. No one of the four?
Mrs. MARKHAM. No one of them.
Mr. BALL. No one of all four?
Mrs. MARKHAM. No, sir.
Mr. BALL. Was there a number two man in there?
Mrs. MARKHAM. Number two is the one I picked.

Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2119
Re: The opinions of witnesses
« Reply #6 on: September 14, 2019, 01:21:58 AM »
Heavily edited though.

Look at this an example on how to lead a witness.

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/lane1.txt

Rush to Judgement was the first book I ever read on the subject years ago. And its a crock.

Of all the researchers, Mark Lane is the worst.

His behaviour in Jonestown is unforgivable.

Heavily edited though.

What's your point? The WC also edited Day's testimony and discussed the need to edit Oswald's history to make it fit.

Regardless of the editing, you can listen to the witnesses speaking freely.

Your dislike and opinion of Mark Lane doesn't alter that one bit.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The opinions of witnesses
« Reply #6 on: September 14, 2019, 01:21:58 AM »

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3818
Re: The opinions of witnesses
« Reply #7 on: September 19, 2019, 02:46:52 AM »
Heavily edited though.

What's your point? The WC also edited Day's testimony and discussed the need to edit Oswald's history to make it fit.

Regardless of the editing, you can listen to the witnesses speaking freely.

Your dislike and opinion of Mark Lane doesn't alter that one bit.

you can listen to the witnesses speaking freely.  Your dislike and opinion of Mark Lane doesn't alter that one bit.

Amen...  I found Sam Holland to be particularly compelling and convincing....  The man was clearly troubled by the official tale handed us by LBJ's "Special Select Blue Ribbon Committee of Venerated and Honorable Men" (Like Alan Dulles  ;))
« Last Edit: September 19, 2019, 06:11:52 PM by Walt Cakebread »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The opinions of witnesses
« Reply #7 on: September 19, 2019, 02:46:52 AM »

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3818
Re: The opinions of witnesses
« Reply #8 on: September 19, 2019, 05:50:33 PM »
People who viewed the assassination prior to the Warren Report.  These are the opinions I value. Not a lawyers interpretation of their opinion. Thank God for Mark Lane.



Thanks for posting the video, Joe.....  At the 19:20 point in the video the surgeon who worked on Connally is telling reporters what he had observed about Governor
Connally's wounds....and he tracked the BULLET ( he is talking about a complete bullet, or major portion of the bullet)  At 19:34 he says... Quote  ... "It entered the left thigh, where it was spent"...unquote

IOW.....  The bullet that caused the wounds on Connally ended up lodged in Connally's left thigh....   It was NOT merely a piece or particle of the bullet.....

Listen to what the doctor said.....

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The opinions of witnesses
« Reply #8 on: September 19, 2019, 05:50:33 PM »

 

Mobile View