For a start are you familiar where the paper bag was found?
And secondly, it's only a paper bag Martin and if Oswald made the bag disappear by flushing the paper bag, burning the paper bag or eating the paper bag, that in no way makes Oswald innocent, you do understand this basic concept, don't you?
JohnM
For a start are you familiar where the paper bag was found? Inside the sniper's nest, right?
And secondly, it's only a paper bag Martin and if Oswald made the bag disappear by flushing the paper bag, burning the paper bag or eating the paper bag, that in no way makes Oswald innocent, you do understand this basic concept, don't you? Completely beside the point. You claimed that the photos were taken before anything was moved in the sniper's nest. If that were true that paper bag should also still be in situ and thus appear in the photographs. You do understand this basic concept, don't you?
And btw it's far more than "only a paper bag".... It's the most vital piece of "evidence" the WC had to explain how the rifle got from Irving to the TSBD! Without the paper bag all they would have had was a rifle found at the TSBD with a questionable link to Oswald.