Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Bugliosi's 53 pieces of evidence. And WCR link.  (Read 19718 times)

Offline Paul May

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 899
Re: Bugliosi's 53 pieces of evidence. And WCR link.
« Reply #24 on: January 09, 2018, 12:24:55 AM »
Advertisement
My posts use the actual evidence. I quote it and put links to it. Why do you avoid the evidence?

Sure, I offer opinion occasionally, but for the part I use the actual evidence. You use nothing but your opinion.

To prove any form of conspiracy exists you need evidence to support that specific conspiracy. Be very specific.  Using your own words that YOU use "actual evidence", post this "actual evidence" for ANY conspiracy.  Put up or stfu. Your choice.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Bugliosi's 53 pieces of evidence. And WCR link.
« Reply #24 on: January 09, 2018, 12:24:55 AM »


Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4236
Re: Bugliosi's 53 pieces of evidence. And WCR link.
« Reply #25 on: January 09, 2018, 12:30:13 AM »


Neither did at least 5 other people in the TSBD alone.





If one of these 5 or more people was tied to the rifle which was found on the 6th floor then you could have an argument, well?



JohnM

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10810
Re: Bugliosi's 53 pieces of evidence. And WCR link.
« Reply #26 on: January 09, 2018, 12:37:57 AM »
If one of these 5 or more people was tied to the rifle which was found on the 6th floor then you could have an argument, well?

...except for the small problem of you never actually tying Oswald to the rifle.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Bugliosi's 53 pieces of evidence. And WCR link.
« Reply #26 on: January 09, 2018, 12:37:57 AM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10810
Re: Bugliosi's 53 pieces of evidence. And WCR link.
« Reply #27 on: January 09, 2018, 12:39:50 AM »
To prove any form of conspiracy exists you need evidence to support that specific conspiracy. Be very specific.

True enough.

And to prove that Lee Harvey Oswald killed JFK, you need compelling evidence to support that claim. Be very specific.

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4236
Re: Bugliosi's 53 pieces of evidence. And WCR link.
« Reply #28 on: January 09, 2018, 12:44:07 AM »
...except for the small problem of you never actually tying Oswald to the rifle.




Awesome, let me get this straight you're going with the "naughty but brilliant incompetent Conspirators" setup Oswald with a rifle that cannot be tied to Oswald, WOW!



JohnM

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Bugliosi's 53 pieces of evidence. And WCR link.
« Reply #28 on: January 09, 2018, 12:44:07 AM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10810
Re: Bugliosi's 53 pieces of evidence. And WCR link.
« Reply #29 on: January 09, 2018, 01:09:24 AM »
Awesome, let me get this straight you're going with the "naughty but brilliant incompetent Conspirators" setup Oswald with a rifle that cannot be tied to Oswald, WOW!

No, I'm going with the "you've never demonstrated that Oswald ordered, received, or ever possessed that particular rifle".

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4236
Re: Bugliosi's 53 pieces of evidence. And WCR link.
« Reply #30 on: January 09, 2018, 01:12:55 AM »
No, I'm going with the "you've never demonstrated that Oswald ordered, received, or ever possessed that particular rifle".




Why setup Oswald with a rifle that cannot be linked to him?



JohnM

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Bugliosi's 53 pieces of evidence. And WCR link.
« Reply #30 on: January 09, 2018, 01:12:55 AM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10810
Re: Bugliosi's 53 pieces of evidence. And WCR link.
« Reply #31 on: January 09, 2018, 01:39:27 AM »
Why setup Oswald with a rifle that cannot be linked to him?

Why don't you ask someone who claims that Oswald was "setup with a rifle"?