Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: Common Ground?  (Read 4877 times)

Online Ray Mitcham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 640
Re: Common Ground?
« Reply #20 on: April 12, 2019, 03:42:15 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
4 sides, Ray. :)

I assume you are going to say it has an outside and an inside, but if it is solid there isn't any inside.
« Last Edit: April 12, 2019, 04:52:25 PM by Ray Mitcham »

Offline Duncan MacRae

  • Administrator
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 227
    • JFK Assassination Videos
Re: Common Ground?
« Reply #21 on: April 12, 2019, 03:48:53 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I assume you are going to say it has an outside and an inside, but if it is solid there isn't any inside.

Everything solid has an inside.

If you snapped your solid cylinder in two, then the two broken pieces would now consist jointly of 8 sides in total, ie, 6 outsides plus 2 separate insides created from the one original inside, by the snapping of the cylinder.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Common Ground?
« Reply #21 on: April 12, 2019, 03:48:53 PM »

Online Ray Mitcham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 640
Re: Common Ground?
« Reply #22 on: April 12, 2019, 03:53:23 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Everything solid has an inside.

If you snapped your solid cylinder in two, then the two broken pieces would now consist jointly of 8 sides in total, ie, 6 outsides plus 2 separate insides created from the one original inside, by the snapping of the cylinder.

Wrong, whilst it has an "inside", a solid object doesn't have a "side" inside it.


Online Charles Collins

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 288
Re: Common Ground?
« Reply #23 on: April 12, 2019, 03:55:26 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
4 sides, Ray. :)

Maybe we should flip a coin to see who is correct. (Heads I win, tails you lose.)
« Last Edit: April 12, 2019, 05:32:57 PM by Charles Collins »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Common Ground?
« Reply #23 on: April 12, 2019, 03:55:26 PM »

Online Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 649
Re: Common Ground?
« Reply #24 on: April 12, 2019, 03:55:35 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Is there any ?common ground? items that both sides of the controversy can agree upon?

Not much.  You have two opposing approaches to the evidence.  Those that believe you can derive conclusions from making logical inferences from the facts and evidence and those who don't.  The latter do not subscribe to the notion that anything can be proven so long as there is any possibility that something else occurred no matter how improbable or absurd.  They grasp at any straw and ignore the mountain of evidence to the contrary presumably as the product of a frame up.  On the CTer end it is mostly about nitpicking evidence of Oswald's guilt to imply a conspiracy by default. 

Online Ray Mitcham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 640
Re: Common Ground?
« Reply #25 on: April 12, 2019, 04:50:31 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Maybe we should flip a coin to see who is correct. (Heads I win, tails you loose.)

Or even lose.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Common Ground?
« Reply #25 on: April 12, 2019, 04:50:31 PM »

Online Charles Collins

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 288
Re: Common Ground?
« Reply #26 on: April 12, 2019, 05:33:52 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Or even lose.

Corrected, thanks.

Offline Duncan MacRae

  • Administrator
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 227
    • JFK Assassination Videos
Re: Common Ground?
« Reply #27 on: April 12, 2019, 05:43:03 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Wrong, whilst it has an "inside", a solid object doesn't have a "side" inside it.
Of course it does, it's called the Inside  from which two new outsides were created.
Everything that has an outside must have an inside, simple physics. One can't exist without the other.
Even if you can never see it, for example inside a Black Hole, it's still there.


JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Common Ground?
« Reply #27 on: April 12, 2019, 05:43:03 PM »

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1295
Re: Common Ground?
« Reply #28 on: April 12, 2019, 05:45:21 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Assuming that you are referring to a round shaped Coin ....
I was but then maybe the case is more like this...


Does the edge have one side or eight? The Commission began with a theory...Oswald did it.
Aside from that, there are dozens of other theories that were never really explored. LBJ and JEH did not want this.....

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2829
Re: Common Ground?
« Reply #29 on: April 12, 2019, 05:52:04 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I was but then maybe the case is more like this...


Does the edge have one side or eight? The Commission began with a theory...Oswald did it.
Aside from that, there are dozens of other theories that were never really explored. LBJ and JEH did not want this.....


there are dozens of other theories that were never really explored. LBJ and JEH did not want this.....

Exactly right..... Read the Katzenbach memo.....   LBJ and JEH wanted the pissants to drink the koolaide......

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Common Ground?
« Reply #29 on: April 12, 2019, 05:52:04 PM »

 

Mobile View