Ah, the classic LN appeal to authority! ?. and wow, you really have got something there?. propaganda wise, I mean!
Not only is it a propaganda site, but the article itself is laughable. It basically amounts to this:
"I believe that Oswald bought a revolver from Seaport Traders, therefore it was a lie when he said he bought one in Fort Worth."
"I believe that he wrote "O.H. Lee" on the so-called "register", therefore he lied about his name"
"He wrote his "diary" after the events described, so he was a liar" (even though he never claimed when he wrote the diary entries)
"I think he had a difficult childhood with his mother which he didn't tell Marina about, therefore he was a liar"
"Oswald told Bouhe he was 'doing fine', and I don't think he was really doing fine, therefore he was a liar"
"Oswald used people as references without their knowledge, so he was a liar" (even though that's not even a lie)
"He called himself a "Radio Speaker and Lecturer", "Street Agitator", and "Organizer", and I don't think that what he did qualifies as that, therefore he was a liar"
Why is it that LN-ers always pad their arguments with nonsense?
