Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: The preponderance of the evidence  (Read 36719 times)

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3588
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #112 on: April 02, 2019, 10:17:05 PM »
Advertisement
I questioned your claim that Oswald was a habitual liar and you didn't back that up at all. The biggest liar is somebody who claims that he doesn't lie!

Telling a lie on a registration for a room is of course being dishonest, but you wouldn't believe the number of people who check into hotels or rooms under false names. Do they all become habitual liars to you?

And how about this one. You just lied about it being the landlady (Mrs Johnson) taking Oswald's registration, instead of Earlene Roberts who actually did.

Does that make you a habitual liar?

Sorry, I forgot that you have trouble understanding my posts. That was made tongue in cheek. You know, the cliche about a typical murder mystery movie or book. (The butler did it.) The entire post was meant to be sarcastic and a joke.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #112 on: April 02, 2019, 10:17:05 PM »


Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #113 on: April 02, 2019, 10:28:12 PM »
Sorry, I forgot that you have trouble understanding my posts. That was made tongue in cheek. You know, the cliche about a typical murder mystery movie or book. (The butler did it.) The entire post was meant to be sarcastic and a joke.

If that was a Joke.... Then you most certainly are not "The Joker"...... Don't give up your regular job as Urinal Cake Technician....   

Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7407
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #114 on: April 02, 2019, 10:50:24 PM »
Sorry, I forgot that you have trouble understanding my posts. That was made tongue in cheek. You know, the cliche about a typical murder mystery movie or book. (The butler did it.) The entire post was meant to be sarcastic and a joke.

As if I didn't understand that. Stop being so damned patronizing as it doesn't become you.

So it wasn't a lie? Ok... but when Oswald lies about his name to the housekeeper of a roominghouse (if that's what he did) he, in your mind, automatically becomes a habitual liar, right?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #114 on: April 02, 2019, 10:50:24 PM »


Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3588
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #115 on: April 02, 2019, 10:51:55 PM »
If that was a Joke.... Then you most certainly are not "The Joker"...... Don't give up your regular job as Urinal Cake Technician....

I?ll never never be able to challenge you for the clown crown.

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3588
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #116 on: April 02, 2019, 10:53:35 PM »
As if I didn't understand that. Stop being so damned patronizing as it doesn't become you.

So it wasn't a lie? Ok... but when Oswald lies about his name to the housekeeper of a roominghouse (if that's what he did) he, in your mind, automatically becomes a habitual liar, right?

If you say so....

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #116 on: April 02, 2019, 10:53:35 PM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #117 on: April 02, 2019, 11:19:17 PM »
Oh, so you think his name really was O.H. Lee? And that he didn?t lie to his landlady about his name?

There were 3 conspirators

1) A. Hidell (rhymes with Fidel) was in charge of armament procurement
2) O.H. Lee was in charge of safe-house procurement
3) Oswald (AKA as 'Dirty Harvey') was in charge of finally becoming a somebody
« Last Edit: April 02, 2019, 11:21:56 PM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7407
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #118 on: April 02, 2019, 11:20:35 PM »
If you say so....

No, it was you who used the inflammatory word, clearly to make a point that you (what else is new) can not back up.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #118 on: April 02, 2019, 11:20:35 PM »


Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7407
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #119 on: April 02, 2019, 11:23:42 PM »
There were 3 conspirators

1) A. Hidell (rhymes with Fidel) was in charge of armament procurement
2) O.H. Lee was in charge of safe-house procurement
3) Oswald (AKA as 'Dirty Harvey') was in charge of finally being a somebody

Nowadays they can access a body with nano surgery robots you can swallow.

Let's hope no such robot will ever end up in your brain, or what's left of it, as it most likely will not survive such a rollercoaster ride!