Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: The preponderance of the evidence  (Read 36004 times)

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #80 on: March 31, 2019, 11:22:02 PM »
Advertisement
LN True Believers never want to get ?drawn in? to discussing the evidence, because their conclusions aren?t based on the evidence.

I sure hope the Reptilians don't have a taste for us poor Lemmings

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #80 on: March 31, 2019, 11:22:02 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10810
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #81 on: April 01, 2019, 05:40:02 AM »
Oswald himself determined that he would be remembered

CTer-breeding produces little CT zombies
@John: Talk about 'true believers', huh
Like Atheist-breeding begets little Atheist zombies

I sure hope the Reptilians don't have a taste for us poor Lemmings

Is there anyone out there who can translate Chapman?s incoherent ramblings into English?

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #82 on: April 01, 2019, 07:06:24 AM »
Jack Ruby determined that Oswald wouldn?t enjoy the attention.

Good one.

And Ruby should be celebrated by conspiracy-mongers everywhere for giving them something to live all these 56yrs

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #82 on: April 01, 2019, 07:06:24 AM »


Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3574
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #83 on: April 02, 2019, 10:48:22 AM »
Some people are more reasonable than others. And some cannot be reasoned with about much of anything. Anyway, I thought that a definition of a reasonable person from the dictionary might be helpful.

rea?son?a?ble
/ˈrēz(ə)nəb(ə)l/
 Learn to pronounce
adjective
adjective: reasonable
1.
(of a person) having sound judgment; fair and sensible.
"no reasonable person could have objected"
synonyms:   sensible, rational, open to reason, full of common sense, logical, fair, fair-minded, just, equitable, decent; More
intelligent, wise, levelheaded, practical, realistic;
based on good sense, sound, judicious, well thought out, well grounded, reasoned, well reasoned, valid, commonsensical, advisable, well advised;
tenable, plausible, feasible, credible, acceptable, admissible, believable, viable
"a reasonable man"
antonyms:   unreasonable, illogical



Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3574
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #84 on: April 02, 2019, 10:58:29 AM »
Good one.

And Ruby should be celebrated by conspiracy-mongers everywhere for giving them something to live all these 56yrs

LHO was a habitual liar. He lied about things even when there was no reason to lie. So I am not sure that he would have cleared up much if he had survived.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #84 on: April 02, 2019, 10:58:29 AM »


Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #85 on: April 02, 2019, 04:21:42 PM »
LHO was a habitual liar. He lied about things even when there was no reason to lie. So I am not sure that he would have cleared up much if he had survived.

There's no reasonable argument that Lee Oswald did not lie....Nearly every human being does...   And Lee was a trained espionage  agent, whose very prerequisite is based on deception.    However being a liar does not mean the person is a murderer....  And with regard to your statement that he had no reason to lie. You can't possible know whether Lee had good sound logical reason to lie about something.    IMO the biggest liar of the case was J.C. Day, or Will Fritz....

I'm aware that many folks live in a fairy tale world where the good guys never lie and the bad guys are all liars....  Anybody who believes such nonsense should seek a psychiatrist ..... 
« Last Edit: April 02, 2019, 07:11:14 PM by Walt Cakebread »

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7395
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #86 on: April 02, 2019, 05:49:34 PM »
LHO was a habitual liar. He lied about things even when there was no reason to lie. So I am not sure that he would have cleared up much if he had survived.

LHO was a habitual liar. He lied about things even when there was no reason to lie.

Knew him well, did you?

If not, stop making claims about him you haven't got any possibility of knowing for certain!
« Last Edit: April 02, 2019, 05:51:14 PM by Martin Weidmann »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #86 on: April 02, 2019, 05:49:34 PM »


Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3574
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #87 on: April 02, 2019, 06:57:05 PM »
LHO was a habitual liar. He lied about things even when there was no reason to lie.

Knew him well, did you?

If not, stop making claims about him you haven't got any possibility of knowing for certain!

Oh, so you think his name really was O.H. Lee? And that he didn?t lie to his landlady about his name?