The preponderance of the evidence

[Martin Weidmann]

I appreciate your comments Paul. I keep hoping that something new will be uncovered but know that it is unlikely. My first post here involved looking for evidence of the timing of the shot that the WC never defined the timing of. I have explored many avenues and learned a lot. I don?t claim to be an expert, don?t have all the details memorized, but I do believe that I have looked at this with an open mind. And that is the point that I wish to make.

And that is the point that I wish to make.

Well, you've made it now. So, was this your last post?

[Paul May]

And that is the point that I wish to make.

Well, you've made it now. So, was this your last post?

Typical arrogant Weidmann response Charles. Ignore him as many do.  3rd grade was the best 4 years of his life.

[Martin Weidmann]

Typical arrogant Weidmann response Charles. Ignore him as many do.  3rd grade was the best 4 years of his life.

Oh boy, did I get on your nerves, Paulie?   

[Charles Collins]

And that is the point that I wish to make.

Well, you've made it now. So, was this your last post?

I hope not.

[Paul May]

Oh boy, did I get on your nerves, Paulie?   

Hardly. Intelligent people get on my nerves because they should know better. Hardly the case with respect to you.

[Martin Weidmann]

Hardly. Intelligent people get on my nerves because they should know better. Hardly the case with respect to you.

Ah, the "I am the superior intelligent creature" claim.... but sadly not intelligent enough to understand how stupid and childish it actually is....

[Martin Weidmann]

I hope not.

Why not? What would be the purpose of staying here?

You think you have all the answers and don't want to discuss the evidence or the case... Are you just looking for something to kill time?

[Jack Trojan]

I appreciate your comments Paul. I keep hoping that something new will be uncovered but know that it is unlikely. My first post here involved looking for evidence of the timing of the shot that the WC never defined the timing of. I have explored many avenues and learned a lot. I don?t claim to be an expert, don?t have all the details memorized, but I do believe that I have looked at this with an open mind. And that is the point that I wish to make.

Let's get this straight, you don't think anything new will come out to change your default position that the WC report is spot on and also that if you truly have an open mind then you are obligated to accept that Oswald was a lone nut assassin and not a patsy...because American Nazi and Architect of the Big Event, Allen freakin' Dulles sez so.

Okey dokey, point made. But you didn't need to start a new topic just to lecture the CTs that they aren't open minded like Paul May whose mind is so open his brains fell out.