Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: The preponderance of the evidence  (Read 9253 times)

Offline Peter Kleinschmidt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 402
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #280 on: April 08, 2019, 06:56:01 AM »
Tell us how many of your 'lots of people' conducted 25,000 interviews
Most of the interviews were used as filler to make their final report look as large a possible for their two biggest fans, you and Ross.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #280 on: April 08, 2019, 06:56:01 AM »

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1792
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #281 on: April 08, 2019, 10:39:13 AM »
Where did I say that..

What else did you mean by this;

Tell us how many of your 'lots of people' conducted 25,000 interviews

Online John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6772
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #282 on: April 08, 2019, 08:18:49 PM »
Most of the interviews were used as filler to make their final report look as large a possible for their two biggest fans, you and Ross.

Yes.  It's the same reason that Bugliosi lists "53 pieces of evidence", most of which aren't evidence for anything.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #282 on: April 08, 2019, 08:18:49 PM »

Online Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2751
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #283 on: April 09, 2019, 07:54:38 AM »
What else did you mean by this;

I meant what I said the first time: 25,000 interviews were undertaken. You wouldn't be assuming something, now would you?

Oh, btw can you point out just who your apparently small cadre of interviewers are that might render null and void the 25,000? Perhaps ambulance & Jimmy Jones chaser Mark Lane for instance, who tried to manipulate 'The Divine Miss M' but instead got his arse handed to him? That quality?
« Last Edit: April 09, 2019, 07:59:27 AM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Peter Kleinschmidt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 402
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #284 on: April 09, 2019, 09:40:03 AM »
I meant what I said the first time: 25,000 interviews were undertaken. You wouldn't be assuming something, now would you?

Oh, btw can you point out just who your apparently small cadre of interviewers are that might render null and void the 25,000? Perhaps ambulance & Jimmy Jones chaser Mark Lane for instance, who tried to manipulate 'The Divine Miss M' but instead got his arse handed to him? That quality?
25,000? ha ha ha ha ha  That's funny are sure it wasn't 50,000?  Always an even number, right?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #284 on: April 09, 2019, 09:40:03 AM »

Offline Peter Kleinschmidt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 402
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #285 on: April 09, 2019, 09:48:36 AM »
Yes.  It's the same reason that Bugliosi lists "53 pieces of evidence", most of which aren't evidence for anything.
I don't know why Chapman doesn't use Bugliosi for his last name.  Vincent had one illegitimate kid

Online John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6772
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #286 on: April 09, 2019, 01:14:50 PM »
Oh, btw can you point out just who your apparently small cadre of interviewers are that might render null and void the 25,000?

Who said the interviews were null and void?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #286 on: April 09, 2019, 01:14:50 PM »

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1792
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #287 on: April 09, 2019, 02:39:04 PM »
I meant what I said the first time: 25,000 interviews were undertaken. You wouldn't be assuming something, now would you?

Oh, btw can you point out just who your apparently small cadre of interviewers are that might render null and void the 25,000? Perhaps ambulance & Jimmy Jones chaser Mark Lane for instance, who tried to manipulate 'The Divine Miss M' but instead got his arse handed to him? That quality?

I meant what I said the first time: 25,000 interviews were undertaken. You wouldn't be assuming something, now would you?

I don't need to assume anything. It's pretty obvious what you said, just that it is obvious that you are now trying to distance yourself from the stupidity of it.



JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #287 on: April 09, 2019, 02:39:04 PM »

Offline Zeon Mason

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 287
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #288 on: April 10, 2019, 05:11:44 AM »
Some of the scheduled "interviews" of witnesses were cancelled due to untimely  "suicide" such as George De Morhenschildt, whom after speaking briefly to a reporter and also having received his reply from GHW Bush, about how to proceed at the HSCA hearings, was found dead by apparently shooting himself in the mouth with a shotgun.
« Last Edit: April 10, 2019, 05:12:54 AM by Zeon Mason »

Online Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2751
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #289 on: April 10, 2019, 06:10:24 AM »
Who said the interviews were null and void?

you missed 'might'

scroll back and see if you can figure out who I was originally responding to and why
« Last Edit: April 10, 2019, 06:23:33 AM by Bill Chapman »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #289 on: April 10, 2019, 06:10:24 AM »

 

Mobile View