Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: The preponderance of the evidence  (Read 8942 times)

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 730
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #270 on: April 07, 2019, 07:31:49 PM »
There?s that magic word ?credible? again that means whatever you want it to mean.

I can do that too:  no credible evidence that Oswald was the one who shot Kennedy.

You can make up whatever you want to. And I will be just as interested as I am your invisible dragon.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #270 on: April 07, 2019, 07:31:49 PM »

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6766
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #271 on: April 07, 2019, 08:34:24 PM »
The partial palm print (CE 639) was released to the FBI at midnight 11/22/63.....  It was examined in the FBI lab in Washington DC on Saturday 11/23/63, and it was reported as being useless for ID purposes.   

Bull.

Latona didn?t get the magic partial palmprint until November 29th.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6766
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #272 on: April 07, 2019, 08:36:10 PM »
You can make up whatever you want to. And I will be just as interested as I am your invisible dragon.

And I?m just as disinterested in your evidence-less ?Oswald did it? conclusion as you are in my evidence-less dragon.

Which was the whole point of the analogy.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #272 on: April 07, 2019, 08:36:10 PM »

Online Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3575
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #273 on: April 07, 2019, 09:33:17 PM »
Bull.

Latona didn?t get the magic partial palmprint until November 29th.

Bull !....There is a FBI report dated 11/23/63  that says exactly what I said  it did.....

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6766
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #274 on: April 07, 2019, 09:38:44 PM »
Bull !....There is a FBI report dated 11/23/63  that says exactly what I said  it did.....

Let?s see it, Walt.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #274 on: April 07, 2019, 09:38:44 PM »

Online Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3575
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #275 on: April 07, 2019, 11:15:41 PM »
Let?s see it, Walt.

John It's been over twenty years since I saw that FBI report....  It is in one of the 26 volumes.....But I can't tell you where to find it....

I debated this many years ago in another forum......

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1427
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #276 on: April 08, 2019, 12:20:42 AM »
The partial palm print (CE 639) was released to the FBI at midnight 11/22/63.....  It was examined in the FBI lab in Washington DC on Saturday 11/23/63, and it was reported as being useless for ID purposes.   

After the conspirators realized they had no solid evidence against Lee Oswald they realized that they needed to have evidence to back up their case and support Henry Wades bold lie . Henry Wade had told reporters that they had found Lee Oswald's prints on the gun...But Wade was simply lying.   

Thus Hoover had the evidence sent back to Dallas so they could slip the palm print into the evidence stream.and manipulate the evidence of the arrest shirt.  ......

Some folks simply cannot understand ( or refuse to believe) that J.Edgar Hoover was THE king pin in the coup d e'tat......

The question has been raised as to who is the biggest Kook on this forum. You are definitely in the running.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #276 on: April 08, 2019, 12:20:42 AM »

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2739
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #277 on: April 08, 2019, 12:50:42 AM »
The question has been raised as to who is the biggest Kook on this forum. You are definitely in the running.

Nah, all CTers are tied for first.

As an aside, Gordie Howe once told a referee: 'You're the second-best referee in the league. All the others are tied for first'

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #277 on: April 08, 2019, 12:50:42 AM »

Offline Peter Kleinschmidt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 396
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #278 on: April 08, 2019, 05:49:17 AM »
Are you just going to criticize something that is irrelevant?

Answering a question with a question?
Now you changed this to a game of checkers. Your move
By the way, a preponderance of the evidence is what you brought up.
Are you feeling ok Chuck?

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2739
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #279 on: April 08, 2019, 06:21:50 AM »
Are you saying that the conclusions of the WC are somehow better simply because they interviewed more people?

Where did I say that..

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #279 on: April 08, 2019, 06:21:50 AM »

 

Mobile View