The preponderance of the evidence

[Charles Collins]

Whether you find it more convincing or not, it is not the answer to John's question. Who cares that it was Oswald's palm print on the index card when it can not be determined where it came from and when it was created.

Do you have any evidence whatsoever that the adhesive matter is not as described?

[Martin Weidmann]

Do you have any evidence whatsoever that the adhesive matter is not as described?

On 11/23/63 the FBI lab examined the rifle closely and found no prints on the rifle. They also do not mention finding any adhesive matter.

Only after the rifle was returned to the DPD and Oswald was killed did Day produce the index card.

Can you rule out that after it's return, the rifle wasn't used to create the index card?

[Charles Collins]

On 11/23/63 the FBI lab examined the rifle closely and found no prints on the rifle. They also do not mention finding any adhesive matter.

Only after the rifle was returned to the DPD and Oswald was killed did Day produce the index card.

Can you rule out that after it's return, the rifle wasn't used to create the index card?

So I will take your response to my question as non responsive.

[Martin Weidmann]

So I will take your response to my question as non responsive.

Oh, I responded alright. You just didn't like it.

You are not interested in the facts of this case or in looking at the evidence with an "open mind"

Instead, anything you don't like, you just dismiss. Nothing more than another LN troll

[Alan Ford]

On 11/23/63 the FBI lab examined the rifle closely and found no prints on the rifle. They also do not mention finding any adhesive matter.

Only after the rifle was returned to the DPD and Oswald was killed did Day produce the index card.

Can you rule out that after it's return, the rifle wasn't used to create the index card?

Don't you get it yet, Mr Weidmann? Mr Collins will automatically rule out anything that might threaten the fairy tale he has fallen for. That's what 'keeping an open mind' means for Warren Gullibles like Mr Collins. 

[John Iacoletti]

The evidence and conclusion was independently verified:

Latona testified that this palmprint was the right palmprint of Lee Harvey Oswald.58 At the request of the Commission, Arthur Mandella, fingerprint expert with the New York City Police Department, conducted an independent examination and also determined that this was the right palmprint of Oswald.59 Latona's findings were also confirmed by Ronald G. Wittmus, another FBI fingerprint



I most certainly find this more convincing than anything I have seen that tries to cast doubt on it.

A partial palm print on an index card was matched to Oswald, and this convinces you of what, exactly?

[Charles Collins]

Oh, I responded alright. You just didn't like it.

You are not interested in the facts of this case or in looking at the evidence with an "open mind"

Instead, anything you don't like, you just dismiss. Nothing more than another LN troll

You responded but failed to address the question.