Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: A straight line  (Read 112057 times)

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7395
Re: A straight line
« Reply #232 on: March 03, 2018, 02:49:32 AM »
Advertisement


How does that answer my question?

You CTs are so predictable, in court I'd present the established predictable behaviour of Oswald's New Orleans Post Office application with AJ Hidell written in Oswald's handwriting and you'd present...... nothing.



JohnM

in court I'd present the established predictable behaviour of Oswald's New Orleans Post Office application with AJ Hidell written in Oswald's handwriting

In what court? The one in your imagination or a real one?

Btw.. are you a lawyer now?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: A straight line
« Reply #232 on: March 03, 2018, 02:49:32 AM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: A straight line
« Reply #233 on: March 03, 2018, 05:57:38 AM »
Do you realize how difficult it is to remove all your prints from a MC after you have disassembled/reassembled and fired, then ditched it? Impossible! And Shirley, Oswald realized that a printless  rifle would still lead back to him, regardless of whether they snuck a post-mortem palm print on the stock.

Which leads us to why would military marksman Oswald, who knew a thing or 2 about rifles, keep a useless scope on the MC when he knew he would have to use the iron sights? Especially, if he smuggled it disassembled into the TSBD in a too short paper bag? If you counter with, Oswald didn't know the scope was useless because he hadn't shot the rifle before, then you have to explain how phenomenal it was that a rusty marksman pulled off 2 for 3 hits in 10 secs on a moving target with a wonky scope?

Oswald must have looked thru the scope, lined up JFK's head and hit Tague with a ricochet off the pavement. He must have noticed the small dust cloud from the 1st shot and re-calibrated his aim thru the scope for the MB shot, and what a shot it was. 7 wounds and very close to a head shot, all after bolting in the next round and re-aiming thru the wonky scope.

It took 3 shims to realign the scope on the MC before the FBI could even hit the target. The scope was useless and the big question is whether Oswald knew this and used the iron sights instead. And if Oswald knew the scope was useless, then why did he keep it on the gun when he smuggled its parts into the TSBD?

Answer: The scope was left on the gun (which was never disassembled/reassembled BTW) because the MC that was planted on the 6th floor needed to match the backyard photos of Oswald holding it. Sheep dipping 101. Otherwise, there is no way in hell that Oswald could have not left a single print on the stock, barrel, bolt, trigger, clip and ammo. Impossible.

'Answer: The scope was left on the gun (which was never disassembled/reassembled BTW) because the MC that was planted on the 6th floor needed to match the backyard photos of Oswald holding it. Sheep dipping 101. Otherwise, there is no way in hell that Oswald could have not left a single print on the stock, barrel, bolt, trigger, clip and ammo. Impossible.'

Thanks for clearing that all up for us

 ;)
« Last Edit: March 03, 2018, 05:59:58 AM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: A straight line
« Reply #234 on: March 03, 2018, 06:32:52 AM »
Emboldening words is not shouting. Putting words in "upper case" is shouting. Please try to keep up, Chappers.

You mean like this, from Ernie?

YOUR BOX IS OTHERWISE POSITIONED THEN THE BOX IN THE REAL DILLARD PHOTO,........

And since all-caps are banned from this forum, one could argue that all-bolded text becomes the go-to formatting (for conveying yelling) by default.

IMO, all-caps plus bolding, as in Ernie's sample above (combined with his automatic insults to all LNers who dare disagree with him) are tantamount to screaming


JFK Assassination Forum

Re: A straight line
« Reply #234 on: March 03, 2018, 06:32:52 AM »


Offline Ray Mitcham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 994
Re: A straight line
« Reply #235 on: March 03, 2018, 09:48:16 AM »
You mean like this, from Ernie?

YOUR BOX IS OTHERWISE POSITIONED THEN THE BOX IN THE REAL DILLARD PHOTO,........

And since all-caps are banned from this forum, one could argue that all-bolded text becomes the go-to formatting (for conveying yelling) by default.

IMO, all-caps plus bolding, as in Ernie's sample above (combined with his automatic insults to all LNers who dare disagree with him) are tantamount to screaming
Your apology for being wrong accepted.

Offline Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 833
Re: A straight line
« Reply #236 on: March 03, 2018, 11:08:27 PM »
'Answer: The scope was left on the gun (which was never disassembled/reassembled BTW) because the MC that was planted on the 6th floor needed to match the backyard photos of Oswald holding it. Sheep dipping 101. Otherwise, there is no way in hell that Oswald could have not left a single print on the stock, barrel, bolt, trigger, clip and ammo. Impossible.'

Thanks for clearing that all up for us

 ;)

Check and mate!  ;)

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: A straight line
« Reply #236 on: March 03, 2018, 11:08:27 PM »


Offline Steve M. Galbraith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1434
Re: A straight line
« Reply #237 on: March 04, 2018, 12:31:35 AM »
'Answer: The scope was left on the gun (which was never disassembled/reassembled BTW) because the MC that was planted on the 6th floor needed to match the backyard photos of Oswald holding it. Sheep dipping 101. Otherwise, there is no way in hell that Oswald could have not left a single print on the stock, barrel, bolt, trigger, clip and ammo. Impossible.'

Thanks for clearing that all up for us

 ;)

Remember they say Oswald never owned that rifle. That's what he said too.

All planted.

So the same rifle they say Oswald never had is in the picture of him with that rifle. And oh yeah, he really truly did bring curtain rods to work that day. The ones never found? The ones he didn't bring with him when he left the building right after the shooting? The ones he absolutely needed to bring to his room. Yeah, those rods.

That's called conspiracy logic. It doesn't have to make sense; it just has to clear Oswald.

Yes, the top CIA agent Oswald who never had a car, never had a phone, never had a house, lived on unemployment checks and apparently went on his top secret missions using a bus.

In cloud cuckoo land that makes sense. Everywhere else it's absurd.
« Last Edit: March 04, 2018, 01:04:42 AM by Steve M. Galbraith »

Offline Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 833
Re: A straight line
« Reply #238 on: March 04, 2018, 01:40:54 AM »
Remember they say Oswald never owned that rifle. That's what he said too.

All planted.

So the same rifle they say Oswald never had is in the picture of him with that rifle. And oh yeah, he really truly did bring curtain rods to work that day. The ones never found? The ones he didn't bring with him when he left the building right after the shooting? The ones he absolutely needed to bring to his room. Yeah, those rods.

That's called conspiracy logic. It doesn't have to make sense; it just has to clear Oswald.

Yes, the top CIA agent Oswald who never had a car, never had a phone, never had a house, lived on unemployment checks and apparently went on his top secret missions using a bus.

In cloud cuckoo land that makes sense. Everywhere else it's absurd.

Now apply all that to Oswald being a fake defector singleton agent, sheep dipped as a patsy and it all makes sense to those with freedom of thought.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: A straight line
« Reply #238 on: March 04, 2018, 01:40:54 AM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: A straight line
« Reply #239 on: March 04, 2018, 03:49:37 AM »
Now apply all that to Oswald being a fake defector singleton agent, sheep dipped as a patsy and it all makes sense to those with freedom of thought.

Tell us why anyone would want to entertain fringer theories.

Additionally, if you have proof that anyone else besides the killer knew that there was about to be an attempt made on Kennedy that day, by all means do post it.