Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: A straight line  (Read 111924 times)

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1824
Re: A straight line
« Reply #24 on: February 05, 2018, 03:53:01 AM »
Advertisement
Joe,

Given the initial investigations had a 3 bullet pattern of JFK hit, Connally hit, JFK hit, which was only later modified to fit the Teague strike in after quite a period of time.
That Gov Connally and his wife both consistently asserted that the Gov was hit after JFK.

I do not think being sceptical of the SBT, is a quirky belief.

Anthony, no modification was needed to fit the Tague strike. If Tague was hit at all, it was from a fragment from the head shot. Directly or indirectly.


JFK Assassination Forum

Re: A straight line
« Reply #24 on: February 05, 2018, 03:53:01 AM »


Online Jerry Organ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2277
Re: A straight line
« Reply #25 on: February 05, 2018, 04:01:29 AM »
Nice one John. I don't recall ever seeing it before.

It's a nice one, isn't it. Tom Dillard snapped it at Love Field.




« Last Edit: February 05, 2018, 04:10:21 AM by Jerry Organ »

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1824
Re: A straight line
« Reply #26 on: February 05, 2018, 05:12:11 AM »
It's a nice one, isn't it. Tom Dillard snapped it at Love Field.





It is indeed Jerry. Rotate Connally 30 degrees to the right and move Kennedy's right arm inboard and down and you'll have their relative positions at the time of the single bullet strike. It's an awesome photo. Why haven't I seen it before?


JFK Assassination Forum

Re: A straight line
« Reply #26 on: February 05, 2018, 05:12:11 AM »


Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7395
Re: A straight line
« Reply #27 on: February 05, 2018, 09:01:38 AM »


You'll think the resident CT trajectory experts Doofus and Weidmann would have realized by now that they're a bit off on their car placement.

At least we now have an idea of where Martin was standing when he pointed his laser.

You'll think the resident CT trajectory experts Doofus and Weidmann would have realized by now that they're a bit off on their car placement.

Says the guy who is unable to place the limo anywhere so it lines up in a straight line to the 6th floor window. Even your own close up shows perfectly that cars travelling in the center lane do not line up straight.


At least we now have an idea of where Martin was standing when he pointed his laser.

No you don't.

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7395
Re: A straight line
« Reply #28 on: February 05, 2018, 09:06:44 AM »

I present irrefutable evidence and all you got is insults, Yawn!

JohnM

Too much substance abuse again, John?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: A straight line
« Reply #28 on: February 05, 2018, 09:06:44 AM »


Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7395
Re: A straight line
« Reply #29 on: February 05, 2018, 09:09:49 AM »


Where would a bullet coming from up and the left of the car end up after going through Kennedy's neck (if it ever did)?

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7395
Re: A straight line
« Reply #30 on: February 05, 2018, 09:12:47 AM »
It's a nice one, isn't it. Tom Dillard snapped it at Love Field.





So, now you have to move Kennedy further to the side of the car to make it work?

« Last Edit: February 05, 2018, 09:20:39 AM by Martin Weidmann »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: A straight line
« Reply #30 on: February 05, 2018, 09:12:47 AM »


Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7395
Re: A straight line
« Reply #31 on: February 05, 2018, 09:17:49 AM »
It is indeed Jerry. Rotate Connally 30 degrees to the right and move Kennedy's right arm inboard and down and you'll have their relative positions at the time of the single bullet strike. It's an awesome photo. Why haven't I seen it before?

Tim,

You don't have a clue about the relative positions of Kennedy and Connally at the time of the shooting. All you are doing is shifting them around to a point where you think the SBT would work. In other words, you are manipulating the evidence to fit a predetermined conclusion.
« Last Edit: February 05, 2018, 09:28:18 AM by Martin Weidmann »