A straight line

[Tim Nickerson]

...and as little as 4.2 inches.  Not much help there.

As usual ,you are wrong. "As much as 8.6 inches" is quite helpful.

 

Besides, Itek based this on their positions at Z183 and Z188.

They also utilized stereo pairs from 183-187, and 189-193.

[Bill Chapman]

Just because someone says they're innocent doesn't mean they're innocent.

Some of what I post is tongue-in-cheek, Alice. St.John the Virtuous once accused me of believing Oswald quilty only because no other shooter could be shown. So, I naturally countered with an equally nonesensical notion that CTers believe Oswald innocent because he said he was. Tit for tat.

[John Iacoletti]

As usual ,you are wrong. "As much as 8.6 inches" is quite helpful.

It's only helpful if you can show the SBT works for 4.2 inches as well.
 

They also utilized stereo pairs from 183-187, and 189-193.

That's great, but do you think the single bullet happened between 183-187 or 189-193?

[John Iacoletti]

Some of what is tongue-in-cheek, Alice. John once accused me of believing Oswald quilty only because no other shooter could be shown.

That's because the only response you ever give in support of your opinion is "name your shooter".

[Alice Thorton]

I am not sure about that.   Many CTers say that Oswald was a "patsy" and, as far as I can tell, the only evidence that he was a patsy came from Oswald himself.

Yes, I have seen that as well. News has a direct quote from Oswald saying that himself.

[Tim Nickerson]

It's only helpful if you can show the SBT works for 4.2 inches as well.

Wrong. It's helpful in that it allows me to position Connally as much as 8.6 inches inboard of Kennedy if I need to.
 

That's great, but do you think the single bullet happened between 183-187 or 189-193?

Z193 was about 1.6 seconds before the shot. The positions of the two would have changed very little in that small amount of time. 

[Steve Thompson]

I believe the bullet that passed through JFK and hit JBC in the back is the one shown just behind the reenactor's right ear by the hairline.
The shot to JFK's back, apparently, did not penetrate more than an inch or two.

Sometime after this reenactment by the SS, it was decided that the wound by the hairline should be forgotten, and that the back shot show now be connected to a throat exit - which as you can see from the below photo and considering the sixth floor snipers nest behind - is preposterous.  But, without dropping the hairline shot, you've got three hits on JFK...and that just doesn't work well with the lone nut scenario...



https://photos.google.com/search/_tra_/photo/AF1QipOgAYwTqNlIRPDhDbLL_gZEIor5ooWadb8WxfV-

[Tim Nickerson]

I believe the bullet that passed through JFK and hit JBC in the back is the one shown just behind the reenactor's right ear by the hairline.
The shot to JFK's back, apparently, did not penetrate more than an inch or two.

https://www.jfkassassinationgallery.com/displayimage.php?pid=1197&fullsize=1

Steve, that's contradictory. The bullet passed through JFK yet it only penetrated no more than an inch or two?