Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: A straight line  (Read 111750 times)

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4236
Re: A straight line
« Reply #32 on: February 05, 2018, 09:27:26 AM »
Advertisement
Tim,

You don't have a clue about the relative positions of Kennedy and Connally. All you are doing is shifting them around to a point where you think the SBT would work. In other words, you are manipulation the "facts" to fit a predetermined conclusion.



Quote
You don't have a clue about the relative positions of Kennedy and Connally

The Zapruder film with a reasonable amount of accuracy gives us the relative positions of Kennedy and Connally.

Quote
All you are doing is shifting them around to a point where you think the SBT would work. In other words, you are manipulation the "facts" to fit a predetermined conclusion.

You must be joking, Tim's scientific methodology is precisely how you solve problems, you deal with the parameters and you match it against the known evidence.



JohnM




JFK Assassination Forum

Re: A straight line
« Reply #32 on: February 05, 2018, 09:27:26 AM »


Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7394
Re: A straight line
« Reply #33 on: February 05, 2018, 09:30:49 AM »


The Zapruder film with a reasonable amount of accuracy gives us the relative positions of Kennedy and Connally.

You must be joking, Tim's scientific methodology is precisely how you solve problems, you deal with the parameters and you match it against the known evidence.

JohnM

Tim's scientific methodology is precisely how you solve problems, you deal with the parameters and you make it match it against the known evidence.

There, I fixed it for you

Now what about that straight line from the 6th floor window to the limo? You can place the limo anywhere you like in the center lane, so why don't you give it a try?


« Last Edit: February 05, 2018, 12:50:28 PM by Martin Weidmann »

Offline Ray Mitcham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 994
Re: A straight line
« Reply #34 on: February 05, 2018, 09:36:43 AM »
Perhaps Mr Mytton with his excellence in providing doctored photos could mark on the copy of the autopsy sheet where he thinks the bullet that he believes entered at the place marked 14 cos below the mastoid, exited JFK's body.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: A straight line
« Reply #34 on: February 05, 2018, 09:36:43 AM »


Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4236
Re: A straight line
« Reply #35 on: February 05, 2018, 09:56:32 AM »
Perhaps Mr Mytton with his excellence in providing doctored photos could mark on the copy of the autopsy sheet where he thinks the bullet that he believes entered at the place marked 14 cos below the mastoid, exited JFK's body.







JohnM

Offline Ray Mitcham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 994
Re: A straight line
« Reply #36 on: February 05, 2018, 03:43:47 PM »






JohnM

So you agree that the entrance hole shown on the autopsy sheet is much lower than the alleged exit hole in the throat.

Seems we are making progress.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: A straight line
« Reply #36 on: February 05, 2018, 03:43:47 PM »


Offline Gary Craig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 907
Re: A straight line
« Reply #37 on: February 05, 2018, 03:45:39 PM »
John F Kennedy - The Autopsy

Offline Jerry Organ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2277
Re: A straight line
« Reply #38 on: February 05, 2018, 04:41:08 PM »
Unfortunately, every single trajectory shown has the bullet passing front to back through JFK's neck on a route that would have to pass through JFK's cervical vertebrae.

66 posts in less than a day on this thread. I know why the CT's are here; once again, why do LN's put so much effort into "winning" debates on this forum?




The bullet did not strike the spinal column, if that's what you're claiming with "pass through JFK's cervical vertebrae".

The bullet passed to the immediate right of the spinal column. I believe it passed between the transverse processes of C7 and T1. Baden thought pressure from the missile channel caused the T1 right transverse process to suffer a non-displaced fracture.



Quote

If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the coverup.

Are YOU part of the coverup?


This rote thing got Bob all the way through Grade Six. Not only that, he was the highest in his class.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: A straight line
« Reply #38 on: February 05, 2018, 04:41:08 PM »


Offline Gary Craig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 907
Re: A straight line
« Reply #39 on: February 05, 2018, 04:58:18 PM »


Here is the Attorney General, in a taped phone call, telling LBJ they don't have the photo of JFK's right lung. The one Humes testified was taken. Note this is 3+ years after the WCR and he's telling the POTUS that one photo could "show the course and direction the bullet that entered the lower part of the neck and exited the front part."

http://www.jfklancer.com/Clark.LBJ.html

Date: 1-21-67 12:00 Noon

Time: 7 mins 25 secs at the end of a 8 mins 31 secs conversation

Phone Conversation between Acting Attorney General Ramsey Clark and President Lyndon Johnson
Re: Autopsy Photos

-snip-

"That is, there may be a photo missing. Dr. Humes, Commander and Naval doctor, testified before the Warren Commission that this one photo made of the highest portion of the right lung."

-snip-

"It could be contended that that photo could show the course and direction the bullet that entered the lower part of the neck and exited the front part."

-snip-

"We are left with one specific problem. Dr. Humes did testify before the Warren Commission there was such a photo [that] we don't have."


-snip-