Humor me

[Jerry Freeman]

Interesting.  What?s been offered to prove this conspiracy in 56 years?

Someone should produce a Paul May doll. You pull the string and it asks the same question over and over again ... day after day.....month after month for 56 years.

[Paul May]

Someone should produce a Paul May doll. You pull the string and it asks the same question over and over again ... day after day.....month after month for 56 years.

I?ll stop asking the question when it?s answered. I believe it?s safe to say you cannot answer it. Why would u be any different than any other conspiracy nut? 56 years and you lunatics cannot produce an alternative to the events of that day.  Know how stupid you sound? Apparently not.

[Paul May]

Pssssst Mr May.... Have you ever heard of the HSCA ?.....  Are you aware that they used "hard, credible evidence" and they concluded that there was a conspiracy behind the coup d e'tat.

Once again Walt, you either lie deliberately or more likely still know nothing about the case. At all. The HSCA, agreed with the WC that Oswald shot POTUS. THE HSCA NEVER said it was a conspiracy. They said it was a probable conspiracy but....they could not prove it. No different than what Gary Mack stated. Not one human being in 56 years has PROVEN a conspiracy.  So Walt, keep screaming coup like the maniac you are and after you?ve left this life, people will remember you likely ?as the nut? who screamed ?CONSPIRACY? and just kept lying his entire life.

[John Iacoletti]

 Not one human being in 56 years has PROVEN that Oswald did it either, so what?s the difference?

[Alan Ford]

Hello Mr May!

Perhaps you can explain the below for us?

Thank you!

Bumped for Mr May, who seems to have missed it the first time! 

[Walt Cakebread]

Once again Walt, you either lie deliberately or more likely still know nothing about the case. At all. The HSCA, agreed with the WC that Oswald shot POTUS. THE HSCA NEVER said it was a conspiracy. They said it was a probable conspiracy but....they could not prove it. No different than what Gary Mack stated. Not one human being in 56 years has PROVEN a conspiracy.  So Walt, keep screaming coup like the maniac you are and after you?ve left this life, people will remember you likely ?as the nut? who screamed ?CONSPIRACY? and just kept lying his entire life.

Once again Walt, you either lie deliberately or more likely still know nothing about the case.
In making a statement like this you merely expose your ignorance.... Because there are many in this forum who disagree with you...

And I know without any doubt that Lee Oswald DID NOT fire that carcano from the sixth floor window. I know that as sure as the sun rises and sets every day....
 And I doubt that he fired any weapon from anyplace in Dealy Plaza ......   

[Paul May]

Not one human being in 56 years has PROVEN that Oswald did it either, so what?s the difference?

Huge difference. History has recorded Oswald as the assassin. Try reading non fiction as opposed to conspiracy theory. You may learn something.  Nah, you won?t.

[Paul May]

Bumped for Mr May, who seems to have missed it the first time! 

And this minor piece of nothing means what to you?  The relevance is?  You believe this singular piece of nonsense offsets EVERY piece of physical evidence proving Oswald as the sole shooter?  I hope you?re kidding but I know you?re not.  That?s your sickness.

[Paul May]

Once again Walt, you either lie deliberately or more likely still know nothing about the case.
In making a statement like this you merely expose your ignorance.... Because there are many in this forum who disagree with you...

And I know without any doubt that Lee Oswald DID NOT fire that carcano from the sixth floor window. I know that as sure as the sun rises and sets every day....
 And I doubt that he fired any weapon from anyplace in Dealy Plaza ......

You know without any doubt huh?  So, you believe somebody other than Oswald shot Kennedy?  Well Walt, belief is something one has in the absence of actual evidence.  Belief contains bias.  Belief is always seeking out confirmation.  Yes, this is a conspiracy forum.  That?s why you?re here Walt, is it not?

[Alan Ford]

And this minor piece of nothing means what to you?  The relevance is?  You believe this singular piece of nonsense offsets EVERY piece of physical evidence proving Oswald as the sole shooter?  I hope you?re kidding but I know you?re not.  That?s your sickness.

 

This 'minor piece of nothing', Mr May, is an official DPD document pertaining to the submission and release of two items of physical evidence:



Kindly take note of the dates on this document, and then explain to us where you believe these 2 curtain rods came from.

Thank you!