Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: BWF and LMR may not have been the only ones who saw LHO with a bag on 11/22/1963  (Read 22947 times)

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1283
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I consider whoever marked in the dates to be sloppy. I've signed numerous documents without noting the dates on them , unless I was the one writing the dates on them.

 :D

Are you a law enforcement official, Mr Nickerson, with special responsibility for investigating the death of your President?

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1309
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
:D

Are you a law enforcement official, Mr Nickerson, with special responsibility for investigating the death of your President?

No, I'm not. But I do regularly sign off on deliveries worth more than $30,000. The two curtain rods that Howlett removed from the Paine garage on Mar 23 were worthless.

JFK Assassination Forum


Online Colin Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 713
  • Beware of Geeks bearing gifs.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Thanks Tim, also a piece of supporting evidence is the following dated form where Day examined the curtain rods on the 25th which is the perfectly applicable date for curtain rods received on the 24th.



JohnM

Working well as a team guys.....LOL. Much laughter with each effort. Please indulge me (and that will make at least two of us).

Of course and date....eg the 25th March could be anything given the evidence before us from your theory....sloppy dating by Day.....and a heavy workload on a case that was solved by day one. Isn?t that why he did not include the bottle and chicken lunch remnants in the evidence sent to the FBI on the night of the assassination? No Oswald prints found. There you go, Oswald filter applied less than 12 hours of the shooting.


Online Colin Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 713
  • Beware of Geeks bearing gifs.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
No, I'm not. But I do regularly sign off on deliveries worth more than $30,000. The two curtain rods that Howlett removed from the Paine garage on Mar 23 were worthless.

Agree that the Paine rods were essentially worthless as evidence. Question is why make a such fuss over them at that stage.

JFK Assassination Forum


Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1657
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Agree that the Paine rods were essentially worthless as evidence. Question is why make a such fuss over them at that stage.

Wasn't there a number of items recovered from the Paine residence, maybe they were just trying to establish that Oswald was ever at the Paine residence, what proof is there that Oswald was actually in the Paine house?
Did Frazier see Oswald go into the house?
Wasn't Ruth connected to the CIA?
Wasn't Marina connected to the KGB?
Wasn't Ruth's kids 7th level Masons?
And as for Michael Paine he was guilty up to his eyeballs.

So my conclusion is that nobody can be trusted and they wanted proof that Oswald stayed at the Paine residence!

JohnM

Online Colin Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 713
  • Beware of Geeks bearing gifs.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Wasn't there a number of items recovered from the Paine residence, maybe they were just trying to establish that Oswald was ever at the Paine residence, what proof is there that Oswald was actually in the Paine house?
Did Frazier see Oswald go into the house?
Wasn't Ruth connected to the CIA?
Wasn't Marina connected to the KGB?
Wasn't Ruth's kids 7th level Masons?
And as for Michael Paine he was guilty up to his eyeballs.

So my conclusion is that nobody can be trusted and they wanted proof that Oswald stayed at the Paine residence!

JohnM

Your best effort yet.

JFK Assassination Forum


Online Colin Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 713
  • Beware of Geeks bearing gifs.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I consider whoever marked in the dates to be sloppy. I've signed numerous documents without noting the dates on them , unless I was the one writing the dates on them.

"...placing some unrealistic expectations on two people you never even met is self indulgent in the extreme, you don't know their priorities or even if they could give a sh!t, the assassination unexpectedly became part of their job and they did the best they could." J Mytton
John knows that Day was an intelligent man too....although he never met him I assume. And when was intelligence ever correlated to diligence or honesty?




Online Colin Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 713
  • Beware of Geeks bearing gifs.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Sorry Alan but I don't have a "theory" that's in desperate need of supporting evidence.
I see a date that was written in error because as I contend each section was written at different times and the document that Colin posted 100% reinforces my original hypothesis that dates were written at different times. Case closed. Try again.

JohnM

I think we would all agree that the dates were written at different times. We are all intelligent after all. I doubt you can claim that hypothesis as original.....and, as you say, you don?t appear to have a theory either.

JFK Assassination Forum


Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1283
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
No, I'm not. But I do regularly sign off on deliveries worth more than $30,000.

:D

Quote
Oswald's fingerprints on tThe two curtain rods that Howlett removed from the Paine garage on Mar 23 werewould have been worthless as evidence.

Fixed that for you!  Thumb1:

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1283
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Working well as a team guys.....LOL. Much laughter with each effort. Please indulge me (and that will make at least two of us).

In fairness to Messrs Nickerson and Mytton, this My-Nice-Makey-Uppy-Numbers-Beat-Your-Nasty-Hard-Evidence-Numbers theory may be the single most impressive demonstration of JFK assassination research skill since Mr Doyle proved that Ms Stanton was wearing a wig in a professional situation on 11/22!

 Thumb1:
« Last Edit: April 19, 2019, 12:06:17 PM by Alan Ford »

JFK Assassination Forum


 

Mobile View