Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: The cramped decoy snipernest  (Read 17687 times)

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1365
Re: The cramped decoy snipernest
« Reply #670 on: April 18, 2018, 06:06:48 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Not for Dirty Harvey

Your boy would fry
Not unlike his current location

Bill thinks that if he wishes hard enough, his dreams will come true.

"There's no place like home.  There's no place like home."

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The cramped decoy snipernest
« Reply #670 on: April 18, 2018, 06:06:48 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1365
Re: The cramped decoy snipernest
« Reply #671 on: April 18, 2018, 07:17:53 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
As I understand it, this horizontal distance is more like 28 inches. Using 28 inches, one gets:

What led you to understand it was 28 inches?

Online Paul Ernst

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 440
  • Semper peratus semper idem
Re: The cramped decoy snipernest
« Reply #672 on: April 18, 2018, 09:26:53 PM »
If he had paid attention, he could also observe the other measurements that I did.

Unfortunately, by showing no interest and being too busy, he shoots at random data again.

Offline Joe Elliott

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 165
Re: The cramped decoy snipernest
« Reply #673 on: April 19, 2018, 03:24:54 AM »

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

What led you to understand it was 28 inches?


From the Diagram in the book “High Treason” by Groden and Livingstone. (which showed 28.5 inches). Actually, the real distance is likely less, judging by the HSCA diagram of the limousine but the point is, not even a Pro CT book gives one a distance anywhere near the 38 inches Paul needs to turn a 7.8 inch drop into an angle of only 11.4 degrees.

Offline Joe Elliott

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 165
Re: The cramped decoy snipernest
« Reply #674 on: April 19, 2018, 03:29:21 AM »

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login



Clearly NOT 17 Degrees!!!



Question:

How do you get your “11.4 degree” angle.




It’s appears to be from simply measuring the angle on your diagram. Is this right? If so, this makes no sense. You can’t take a diagram of JFK’s wounds, put a diagram of Connally’s wounds beside it, and measure the resulting angle to determine the angle of descent needed by the bullet to wound both JFK and Connally. You do see that, right?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The cramped decoy snipernest
« Reply #674 on: April 19, 2018, 03:29:21 AM »


Online Paul Ernst

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 440
  • Semper peratus semper idem
Re: The cramped decoy snipernest
« Reply #675 on: April 19, 2018, 04:11:11 PM »
How do you get your “11.4 degree” angle.?

Answer; sorry I am to busy at the moment and not interested in your question Joe.

Look earlier posts like I said before.




Offline Joe Elliott

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 165
Re: The cramped decoy snipernest
« Reply #676 on: Today at 02:22:50 AM »

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login



Clearly NOT 17 Degrees!!!






You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Question:

How do you get your “11.4 degree” angle.




It’s appears to be from simply measuring the angle on your diagram. Is this right? If so, this makes no sense. You can’t take a diagram of JFK’s wounds, put a diagram of Connally’s wounds beside it, and measure the resulting angle to determine the angle of descent needed by the bullet to wound both JFK and Connally. You do see that, right?






You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

How do you get your “11.4 degree” angle.?

Answer; sorry I am to busy at the moment and not interested in your question Joe.

Look earlier posts like I said before.



Yes. As you always say when you dodge my questions. Search through 60 pages of posts and somewhere I will find the answer to my question.

You dodged the question as I knew you probably would. Clearly, the answer is, yes, you simply measured the angle between the horizontal line through Connally’s wound with the line from Connally’s wound and with JFK’s wound, measured it as 11.4 degrees and concluded that in order for the SBT to work, only a trajectory of a bullet descending 11.4 degrees (relative to the limousine, I assume) could work.

What a dumb analysis. It’s like taking the square root of the page number of the from the report that contained the diagram and conclude that the downward trajectory must be that number.

Online Paul Ernst

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 440
  • Semper peratus semper idem
Re: The cramped decoy snipernest
« Reply #677 on: Today at 04:12:27 AM »
Dumb??

If you can do better why do not show your diagrams instead of that kind of remarks.

Time to study also these maps.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Good luck Joe.



JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The cramped decoy snipernest
« Reply #677 on: Today at 04:12:27 AM »