Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Which Station Waggon's Featured on 11/22/63?  (Read 20564 times)

Offline John Anderson

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
Re: Which Station Waggon's Featured on 11/22/63?
« Reply #32 on: January 29, 2018, 01:18:10 AM »
Advertisement
How would you know what I have said since prior to January 6, 2018, there was NO John Anderson on this forum?


Wrong. I read the complete archives before the site crashed.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Which Station Waggon's Featured on 11/22/63?
« Reply #32 on: January 29, 2018, 01:18:10 AM »


Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Which Station Waggon's Featured on 11/22/63?
« Reply #33 on: January 29, 2018, 01:08:36 PM »
We are talking about you and not a smart person.

Rob, LOOK at the photos of Detective Day checking the CARCANO rifle for fingerprints behind a TSBD window that is brightly lit by sunshine.   
Day clearly is examining the carcano and the shadows indicate that the time is about 1:45 pm ......

Learn to face the truth.....Roger Craig lied about the carcano being a Mauser.    And it was merely his ego that caused him to lie.   He had made a mistake in believing Seymour Weitzman who mistakenly identified the carcano as a Mauser.  Weitzman admitted that he was in error...but the egotistical  Craig could not admit an error..... so rather than admit his error he embellished the tale in an attempt to make it believable.

Most folks can see Roger Craig as he was....but there are a few who suffer from the same affliction that caused Roger Craig to lie... and those folks will not accept facts that refute some theory they embrace. 
« Last Edit: January 29, 2018, 01:39:11 PM by Walt Cakebread »

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Which Station Waggon's Featured on 11/22/63?
« Reply #34 on: January 29, 2018, 09:01:34 PM »
I have never relied on Roger Craig for the Mauser issue. Never. You LNers want to make it about him because you think that it is easier to shoot him down, but there is a good bit of evidence without him. You have been shown this evidence repeatedly, but you keep ignoring it and lying about it.

I have never relied on Roger Craig for the Mauser issue. Never.

On what do you base your belief that the rifle found by Boone was a mauser?

You LNers want to make it about him

Rob you are simply discrediting yourself and damaging your image by posting nonsense.....

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Which Station Waggon's Featured on 11/22/63?
« Reply #34 on: January 29, 2018, 09:01:34 PM »


Offline Lee Wotton

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 168
Re: Which Station Waggon's Featured on 11/22/63?
« Reply #35 on: January 29, 2018, 09:50:59 PM »
A trial of Lee Harvey Oswald would have found him not guilty. How wrong you are. Typical conspiracy hobbyist that has a compulsion to point the finger of blame at everyone other than Oswald.
The evidence that Lee Harvey Oswald shot JFK is substantial both direct and indirect when put together as a whole and overwhelming. The evidence that Oswald shot JD Tippit is ironclad. Any competent jury would have found him guilty with more than enough evidence for a conviction. He was shot by Jack Ruby because like Oswald, Ruby was a lone nut looking for a place in the limelight.

hahahahahahahaha is it April 1st?

Offline Lee Wotton

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 168
Re: Which Station Waggon's Featured on 11/22/63?
« Reply #36 on: January 29, 2018, 10:00:13 PM »
Rob, LOOK at the photos of Detective Day checking the CARCANO rifle for fingerprints behind a TSBD window that is brightly lit by sunshine.   
Day clearly is examining the carcano and the shadows indicate that the time is about 1:45 pm ......

Learn to face the truth.....Roger Craig lied about the carcano being a Mauser.    And it was merely his ego that caused him to lie.   He had made a mistake in believing Seymour Weitzman who mistakenly identified the carcano as a Mauser.  Weitzman admitted that he was in error...but the egotistical  Craig could not admit an error..... so rather than admit his error he embellished the tale in an attempt to make it believable.

Most folks can see Roger Craig as he was....but there are a few who suffer from the same affliction that caused Roger Craig to lie... and those folks will not accept facts that refute some theory they embrace.

Walt, I refer to my earlier post asking for the facts cited that prove Craig was lying?  I've still never seen any?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Which Station Waggon's Featured on 11/22/63?
« Reply #36 on: January 29, 2018, 10:00:13 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10810
Re: Which Station Waggon's Featured on 11/22/63?
« Reply #37 on: January 29, 2018, 10:33:22 PM »
A good number of people believe the steel in the twin towers was vaporised by a ray gun.

Who?

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10810
Re: Which Station Waggon's Featured on 11/22/63?
« Reply #38 on: January 29, 2018, 10:39:25 PM »
Bingo, you have absolutely no evidence that any conspirators smuggled a Carcano, Mauser or any other type of rifle onto the 6th floor,



You have absolutely no evidence that Oswald smuggled any rifle onto the 6th floor.

"Oswald's rifle".  LOL.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Which Station Waggon's Featured on 11/22/63?
« Reply #38 on: January 29, 2018, 10:39:25 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10810
Re: Which Station Waggon's Featured on 11/22/63?
« Reply #39 on: January 29, 2018, 10:44:26 PM »
The evidence that Lee Harvey Oswald shot JFK is substantial both direct and indirect when put together as a whole and overwhelming.



Howard Brennan's eventual identification after his "change of heart".
Handwriting on Klein's order coupon and PO box form and partial palm print that showed up at the FBI a week later on a card.
Limousine bullet fragments matched to rifle
Expended cartridge shells matched to rifle
Large brown paper bag with Oswald's prints
Palm print and fingerprint in sniper's nest

The ballistics implicate a weapon, not a person.  It cannot be proven that the large paper bag was the one Frazier saw or that Oswald carried it into the building or that it was in the sniper's nest when it was first discovered or that it ever contained a rifle.  And prints on boxes in the building are not remarkable because he worked there and would be expected to handle boxes.

So we're left with an inconsistent identification from a witness who was influenced by television and newspaper reports, a questionable reappearing partial print, and unscientific and biased analysis of two block letters on a photo of a microfilm copy of a two-inch order coupon.

What exactly is it that you find "overwhelming"?  That he left his wedding ring behind?
« Last Edit: January 29, 2018, 10:51:57 PM by John Iacoletti »