Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Which Station Waggon's Featured on 11/22/63?  (Read 20659 times)

Offline Lee Wotton

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 168
Re: Which Station Waggon's Featured on 11/22/63?
« Reply #24 on: January 28, 2018, 04:11:11 PM »
Advertisement


Bingo, you have absolutely no evidence that any conspirators smuggled a Carcano, Mauser or any other type of rifle onto the 6th floor, it's been 54 years and your whole case is nothing without this evidence.
Whereas we have Oswald's rifle at his work with his prints and matching fibers, the rifle was filmed as it was recovered on the 6th floor and Oswald's lies about where he put the package and the contents of the package and his flight from the scene of the crime and the killing of a cop are all very powerful evidence, as they say in the classics, Case Closed!



JohnM

As they say in real life:

The HSCA didn't say case closed did they?  In fact the opposite but no one did anything about it.  Why?  Because the high cabal of conspirators continue to run your country whilst Congress is a debating society.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Which Station Waggon's Featured on 11/22/63?
« Reply #24 on: January 28, 2018, 04:11:11 PM »


Offline Lee Wotton

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 168
Re: Which Station Waggon's Featured on 11/22/63?
« Reply #25 on: January 28, 2018, 04:12:53 PM »
Typical bollocks response from you. You've been spouting the same crud for years.
Craig was about as credible as James Files.

thanks John but my post said ive never seen anyone cite evidence for what you state here, and so it continues

Offline Lee Wotton

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 168
Re: Which Station Waggon's Featured on 11/22/63?
« Reply #26 on: January 28, 2018, 04:17:53 PM »
"and matching fibers"

LOL

Fibers from a shirt he wasn't wearing.

And no fibers from the blanket the Carcano was allegedly wrapped in for months.

LOL

"the package and the contents of the package"

You mean the alleged gun case that contained zero forensic evidence of ever containing the TSBD

Carcano, broken down or not.

Gary, thanks for your post.  I agree, a trial of LHO would have found him not guilty.  The evidence was circumstantial at best and not good enough for a conviction.  Why do people think he was killed? A failed trial would prove conspiracy.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Which Station Waggon's Featured on 11/22/63?
« Reply #26 on: January 28, 2018, 04:17:53 PM »


Offline Lee Wotton

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 168
Re: Which Station Waggon's Featured on 11/22/63?
« Reply #27 on: January 28, 2018, 04:19:24 PM »
All, thank you doe your posts but going back to the OP does anyone have any information on station waggons or photos of them in and around DP on 11/22

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Which Station Waggon's Featured on 11/22/63?
« Reply #28 on: January 28, 2018, 04:37:49 PM »
Gary, thanks for your post.  I agree, a trial of LHO would have found him not guilty.  The evidence was circumstantial at best and not good enough for a conviction.  Why do people think he was killed? A failed trial would prove conspiracy.

 The evidence was circumstantial at best and not good enough for a conviction.  Why do people think he was killed? A failed trial would prove conspiracy.


Chief Curry admitted that they had no solid evidence against Lee Oswald......

A failed trial would prove conspiracy.

Hoover and LBJ could not afford to allow Lee Oswald to live long enough to go to trial .......  They were soiling their skivvies when they learned that Lee hadn't been killed in the TSBD.....

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Which Station Waggon's Featured on 11/22/63?
« Reply #28 on: January 28, 2018, 04:37:49 PM »


Offline Lee Wotton

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 168
Re: Which Station Waggon's Featured on 11/22/63?
« Reply #29 on: January 28, 2018, 05:49:54 PM »

 The evidence was circumstantial at best and not good enough for a conviction.  Why do people think he was killed? A failed trial would prove conspiracy.


Chief Curry admitted that they had no solid evidence against Lee Oswald......

A failed trial would prove conspiracy.

Hoover and LBJ could not afford to allow Lee Oswald to live long enough to go to trial .......  They were soiling their skivvies when they learned that Lee hadn't been killed in the TSBD.....

Totally agree Walt, the FBI tried to get Curry to retract his statement that Oswald was known to the FBI

Paul McBrearty

  • Guest
Re: Which Station Waggon's Featured on 11/22/63?
« Reply #30 on: January 28, 2018, 08:35:05 PM »
I agree, a trial of LHO would have found him not guilty.  The evidence was circumstantial at best and not good enough for a conviction.  Why do people think he was killed? A failed trial would prove conspiracy.

A trial of Lee Harvey Oswald would have found him not guilty. How wrong you are. Typical conspiracy hobbyist that has a compulsion to point the finger of blame at everyone other than Oswald.
The evidence that Lee Harvey Oswald shot JFK is substantial both direct and indirect when put together as a whole and overwhelming. The evidence that Oswald shot JD Tippit is ironclad. Any competent jury would have found him guilty with more than enough evidence for a conviction. He was shot by Jack Ruby because like Oswald, Ruby was a lone nut looking for a place in the limelight.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Which Station Waggon's Featured on 11/22/63?
« Reply #30 on: January 28, 2018, 08:35:05 PM »


Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Which Station Waggon's Featured on 11/22/63?
« Reply #31 on: January 28, 2018, 08:51:24 PM »
Totally agree Walt, the FBI tried to get Curry to retract his statement that Oswald was known to the FBI

the FBI tried to get Curry to retract his statement that Oswald was known to the FBI

John Edgar Hoover who was the the FBI ( read God Father) in 1963,  tried to get Curry to retract his statement that he knew that Oswald was CAPABLE  OF ASSASSINATING JFK.

FBI agent James Hosty had been ordered by Hoover ( through SAIC  Gordon Shanklin) to go to DPD headquarters and control the interrogation of Lee Harvey Oswald.  ( This occurred BEFORE  The DPD knew the name of the suspect they had arrested in the Texas theater.)-----  How did Hoover know that Lee Harvey Oswald had not been shot in the theater and had been arrested by the Dallas police BEFORE the police had confirmed his identity??   Answer....Three of Hoover's mafia dons were in the theater at the time the Dallas police arrested that dastardly culprit who snuck into the theater without buying a ticket.

A few minutes after Lee was brought into police headquarters FBI agent James Hosty arrived at police headquarters as Hoover had ordered.   Hosty saw a DPD detective, Jack Revill,  who he knew was the head of the DPD intelligence unit and involved in monitoring subversives in Dallas. 

Hosty blurted out....Jack, a communist has killed JFK,   His name is Lee Harvey Oswald and we knew he was here in Dallas.  We knew he was capable of assassinating the President ( but we never dreamed that he'd actually do it


The part in italics and underlined was not part of Revill's memo..... but it was published in a story by Hugh Aynesworth  in the Dallas Morning News on April 24 1964.

This is what had made the God Father J. Edgar Hoover livid......  There was nothing on record that indicated that Lee Oswald was capable  of any violent act. ( He didn't even strike back when he was physically assaulted by Briniguer in New Orleans )  So where did Hosty get the idea that Lee could be set up as the patsy?.....  ans:...  He knew that Lee had fired a bullet through General Walker's window....and that could be made to look like a bonafide attempt to murder Walker. 
« Last Edit: January 28, 2018, 08:55:24 PM by Walt Cakebread »