Name your shooter

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Name your shooter  (Read 67532 times)

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Name your shooter
« Reply #91 on: September 08, 2019, 12:57:19 PM »
Certainly not "amusing".

Especially not for Kennedy


Offline Peter Kleinschmidt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 485
Re: Name your shooter
« Reply #92 on: September 08, 2019, 06:01:35 PM »
Well?
I'm not going to let you know so easily, you should have to work for it, I will lead the way with the process of elimination. We know it was not Oswald. ...ok your turn

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Name your shooter
« Reply #93 on: September 08, 2019, 08:47:40 PM »
>>> Watch your mouth. And you guess way too much. And do the math yourself. I held the 35" object straight down at my side and right near the top, with my arm at full length.

You can hide a multitude of lengths behind “near the top” and “almost touched the ground”

Quote
The ‘right way’ has the bag almost touching the ground.

How do you know you did it the “right way”? The same way you know how big Oswald’s “bald spot” was?

Quote
>>> What bag? My 35” narrow object represents the length of a broken-down

Too bad you have no evidence whatsoever that the Carcano was ever broken down. Or in a bag.

Quote
>>> Point out any hypocrisy on my part.

You discredit Frazier’s estimation because “he wasn’t paying attention”. Euins said he wasn’t paying attention but you not only accept his agreement with Specter’s 2.5 inch bald spot, but you twist that to refer to Oswald’s unknown sized receding hairline.

Quote
>>> And yet you called my Satan/Oswald bit 'creative' the other day. Anyway, you brainiacs keep playing this ‘bald spot’ dictionary meaning thing and I’m going to mock you.

Of course you will. That’s all you’ve got.


Quote
>>> That’s your job. We have a guy with the spot Euins described.

No, you have a guy who you twisted Euins’ description to include.

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Name your shooter
« Reply #94 on: September 08, 2019, 10:42:09 PM »
You can hide a multitude of lengths behind “near the top” and “almost touched the ground

You can hide a multitude of claims by not committing to anything at all. Continue JAQing off, Sherlock rather than actually demonstrating how to hold a 2ft long bag in such a way so as to almost touch the ground when carried by a 5'9" individual

How do you know you did it the “right way”? The same way you know how big Oswald’s “bald spot” was?
>>> Randle described the way the bag was being handled. The narrow object I handled is heavy enough to force me to find the most efficient way to grasp it, while at the same not compromising my wrist. That turned out to be near the top and straight down to my side with arm extended fully.

Too bad for you that you have no proof that it was a Carcano or was ever in that bag.
>>> How is that 'bad' for me, exactly. This is fun. And what's so bad about having some fun while waiting for you lot to confirm your shooter, along with those who knew in advance that an attempt was about to be made on Kennedy that day?

You discredit Frazier’s estimation because “he wasn’t paying attention”. Euins said he wasn’t paying attention but you not only accept his agreement with Specter’s 2.5 inch bald spot, but you twist that to refer to Oswald’s unknown sized receding hairline.
>>> Buell wasn't paying attention. Euins was. I accept that Euins saw a part of a head that was large enough for him to keep referring to it multiple times.

Of course you will. That’s all you’ve got.
>>> You can't handle being mocked, OBieOne...

No, you have a guy who you twisted Euins’ description to include.
>>> Where did I twist a description that identified the location of a white spot on a head?
« Last Edit: September 08, 2019, 10:55:29 PM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Peter Kleinschmidt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 485
Re: Name your shooter
« Reply #95 on: September 09, 2019, 12:04:26 AM »
You can hide a multitude of claims by not committing to anything at all. Continue JAQing off, Sherlock rather than actually demonstrating how to hold a 2ft long bag in such a way so as to almost touch the ground when carried by a 5'9" individual

How do you know you did it the “right way”? The same way you know how big Oswald’s “bald spot” was?
>>> Randle described the way the bag was being handled. The narrow object I handled is heavy enough to force me to find the most efficient way to grasp it, while at the same not compromising my wrist. That turned out to be near the top and straight down to my side with arm extended fully.

Too bad for you that you have no proof that it was a Carcano or was ever in that bag.
>>> How is that 'bad' for me, exactly. This is fun. And what's so bad about having some fun while waiting for you lot to confirm your shooter, along with those who knew in advance that an attempt was about to be made on Kennedy that day?

You discredit Frazier’s estimation because “he wasn’t paying attention”. Euins said he wasn’t paying attention but you not only accept his agreement with Specter’s 2.5 inch bald spot, but you twist that to refer to Oswald’s unknown sized receding hairline.
>>> Buell wasn't paying attention. Euins was. I accept that Euins saw a part of a head that was large enough for him to keep referring to it multiple times.

Of course you will. That’s all you’ve got.
>>> You can't handle being mocked, OBieOne...

No, you have a guy who you twisted Euins’ description to include.
>>> Where did I twist a description that identified the location of a white spot on a head?


Quote
>>> How is that 'bad' for me, exactly. This is fun. And what's so bad about having some fun while waiting for you lot to confirm your shooter, along with those who knew in advance that an attempt was about to be made on Kennedy that day?


You are not doing well. Why would someone have to know in advance, Oswald did not do it and did not know in advance, I would say he was surprised. You should be easy on yourself and come to grips with the fact that the wounds Connolly and
Kennedy received were not  from bullets that originated from SFW

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Name your shooter
« Reply #96 on: September 09, 2019, 12:45:54 AM »

You are not doing well. Why would someone have to know in advance, Oswald did not do it and did not know in advance, I would say he was surprised. You should be easy on yourself and come to grips with the fact that the wounds Connolly and
Kennedy received were not  from bullets that originated from SFW

Conspirators would know have to know in advance, KleinTroll.
Trajectory cone includes TSBD SE corner

You have to come to grips with the common conspiracy-monger virus known as batshitcrazyitis


« Last Edit: September 09, 2019, 12:46:37 AM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Peter Kleinschmidt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 485
Re: Name your shooter
« Reply #97 on: September 09, 2019, 01:10:17 AM »
Conspirators would know have to know in advance, KleinTroll.
Trajectory cone includes TSBD SE corner

You have to come to grips with the common conspiracy-monger virus known as batshitcrazyitis
Just because mommy made daddy build you a mini version of Dealey Plaza (that you still play with to this day) does not mean you know something about the assassination, actually listen to your nonsense and maybe you can take that first step in the right direction and use your head for once