Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: JD Tippit - Serious timing issues  (Read 25922 times)

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1824
Re: JD Tippit - Serious timing issues
« Reply #136 on: January 01, 2019, 09:39:14 PM »
Advertisement
wow

there it is

I could deny that and say it was 2 weeks later or
what about the evidence of davis and burroughs

but It is clear - she says he arrived about 1.30-1.35pm

It matches JB'ers affidavit (1.30pm)

If you cannot concede in an intelligent debate

its not an intelligent debate

you got me

touche

 ???

Took you long enough. But good on you just the same.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: JD Tippit - Serious timing issues
« Reply #136 on: January 01, 2019, 09:39:14 PM »


Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1824
Re: JD Tippit - Serious timing issues
« Reply #137 on: January 01, 2019, 09:41:51 PM »
wow

there it is

I could deny that and say it was 2 weeks later or
what about the evidence of davis and burroughs

but It is clear - she says he arrived about 1.30-1.35pm

It matches JB'ers affidavit (1.30pm)

If you cannot concede in an intelligent debate

its not an intelligent debate

you got me

touche

 ???

If you wish to carry on here with intelligent debate, you're going to be doing an awful lot of conceding. Sorry, but that's just the way it is. You have the evidence to deal with.

Offline Eddie Haymaker

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 241
Re: JD Tippit - Serious timing issues
« Reply #138 on: January 01, 2019, 10:14:20 PM »
gloating 2 posts in a row?

Its unbecoming

try and be gracious

there's a good gentleman

Oswald did not fire the final bullet
The WR was a cover up


everything else is open ended IMO

I try and keep an open mind
« Last Edit: January 01, 2019, 10:15:59 PM by Eddie Haymaker »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: JD Tippit - Serious timing issues
« Reply #138 on: January 01, 2019, 10:14:20 PM »


Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1824
Re: JD Tippit - Serious timing issues
« Reply #139 on: January 01, 2019, 10:16:17 PM »
gloating 2 posts in a row?

Its unbecoming

try and be gracious

there's a good gentleman

I never gloat. You are reading something into my posts that is not there.

Offline Eddie Haymaker

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 241
Re: JD Tippit - Serious timing issues
« Reply #140 on: January 01, 2019, 10:19:18 PM »

hell,he might have even shot JD

It is possible IMO

but he sure as heck didn't kill JFK

there were others involved

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: JD Tippit - Serious timing issues
« Reply #140 on: January 01, 2019, 10:19:18 PM »


Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1824
Re: JD Tippit - Serious timing issues
« Reply #141 on: January 01, 2019, 10:19:46 PM »


Oswald did not fire the final bullet
The WR was a cover up


everything else is open ended IMO

I try and keep an open mind

See, that's the problem that you are confronted with. The evidence. That evidence points towards Oswald having fired all three shots.

Offline Eddie Haymaker

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 241
Re: JD Tippit - Serious timing issues
« Reply #142 on: January 01, 2019, 10:23:47 PM »
yeah - NO

the headshot to the temple is undeniable
the WR is a farce
the HSCA agree's with me (probable conspiracy)
not you

most (over half) of Americans believe there was more than 1 shooter

So you are in the minority pal

so by definition aren't you guys the kooks now?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: JD Tippit - Serious timing issues
« Reply #142 on: January 01, 2019, 10:23:47 PM »


Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1824
Re: JD Tippit - Serious timing issues
« Reply #143 on: January 01, 2019, 10:47:39 PM »

the headshot from the front is undeniable

The headshot from the front is absolutely deniable. The momentum of a bullet strike wouldn't cause the degree of movement seen in the Zapruder film. Kennedy's head moved about 2 inches forward between frames z312 and Z313. That's from the momentum of the strike. The violent back and to the left movement was a neuromuscular reaction.

Quote
the WR is a farce

You mean the report itself? Whatever. I don't care. I rarely reference the 888 page Report. It's the 26 supporting volumes where it's at.

Quote
the HSCA agree's with me (probable conspiracy)
not you

They agree with you do they? You're 95% sure that there was a conspiracy? OK, here's a few other of their findings:

Lee Harvey Oswald fired three shots at President John F. Kennedy. The second and third shots he fired struck the President. The third shot he fired killed the President.

- President Kennedy was struck by two rifle shots fired from behind him.

- The shots that struck President Kennedy from behind him were fired from the sixth floor window of the southeast corner of the Texas School Book Depository building.

- Lee Harvey Oswald owned the rifle that was used to fire the shots from the sixth floor window of the southeast comer of the Texas School Book Depository building.

- Lee Harvey Oswald, shortly before the assassination, had access to and was present on the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository building.

- Lee Harvey Oswald's other actions tend to support the conclusion that he assassinated President Kennedy


Quote
most (over half) of Americans believe there was more than 1 shooter

So you are in the minority pal

So what? How many of those Americans have read the volumes of the Warren Report or even examined any of the evidence themselves?

Quote
so by definition aren't you guys the kooks now?

LOL! What? Is that how it works?