Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Dry bone Vs Living bone - The key to the SBT?  (Read 2059 times)

Online Gerry Down

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1055
Dry bone Vs Living bone - The key to the SBT?
« on: September 17, 2020, 10:43:07 PM »
Advertisement
All tests so far, which have disproved the SBT, are arguable useless as they have been done on dry bone rather than living bone.

To make a comparison, a dry bone is like a FMJ bullet while a living bone is like a rubber bullet. Which bullet would you be rather hit with a FMJ bullet or a rubber bullet?

9 minutes to 11 minutes on this video:


JFK Assassination Forum

Dry bone Vs Living bone - The key to the SBT?
« on: September 17, 2020, 10:43:07 PM »


Online Marjan Rynkiewicz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 903
Re: Dry bone Vs Living bone - The key to the SBT?
« Reply #1 on: December 05, 2022, 04:19:04 AM »


Here is a link to a copy of Lattimer's 1994 report re tests re Connally's lapel bulge flap flip at Z224.
http://jfk.hood.edu/Collection/Weisberg%20Subject%20Index%20Files/L%20Disk/Lattimer%20John%20Dr/Item%2006.pdf


Lattimer's tests show that his Carcano slug (which pulverized rib)(& broke a radius bone) had the same amount of damage as the SBT slug.
However Lattimer did not tell us whether the rib was old & dry (it was not old & dry) & whether the radius bone was old & dry (i reckon that it was not old & dry).