Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: "We have developed no evidence"....  (Read 1944 times)

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1343
Re: "We have developed no evidence"....
« Reply #30 on: December 08, 2018, 02:08:03 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Hoover would've had enough information handed to him on Oswald. To be fair it was a little premature for Hoover to be making such statements. But it isn't that big an influence on the actual evidence, the sightings etc. You or others can't base your arguments on a few untimely utterings by Hoover. And you can't just make vague accusations against eye witnesses and expect people to ignore clear irrefutable sightings of Oswald as the killer of Officer J.D.Tippit.

You or others can't base your arguments on a few untimely utterings by Hoover.

I'd say they were "untimely".... He wrote on a memo about another line of enquiry that no further action was needed before Oswald was charged with anything.

And you can't just make vague accusations against eye witnesses and

Really, but LNs can call eye-witnesses wrong, mistaken and whatever else as much as they like?

And I am not making vague accusations against anybody. In fact I am pretty convinced that the Tippit witnesses were acting in good faith under a lot a pressure. If anything, I would take issue with the way the line ups were conducted.

expect people to ignore clear irrefutable sightings of Oswald as the killer of Officer J.D.Tippit.

"irrefutable" is a big word to use for witnesses who were never challenged or questioned in a proper trial.

 
« Last Edit: December 08, 2018, 02:40:21 AM by Martin Weidmann »

Online Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2829
Re: "We have developed no evidence"....
« Reply #31 on: December 08, 2018, 02:53:13 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Hoover would've had enough information handed to him on Oswald. To be fair it was a little premature for Hoover to be making such statements. But it isn't that big an influence on the actual evidence, the sightings etc. You or others can't base your arguments on a few untimely utterings by Hoover. And you can't just make vague accusations against eye witnesses and expect people to ignore clear irrefutable sightings of Oswald as the killer of Officer J.D.Tippit.

You (   ) can't base your arguments on a few untimely utterings by Hoover.

Mr Hardaker... Perhaps you should back off a bit and take a hard look at the timing of what you call "untimely utterings"

Immediately after Lee Oswald was murdered, Hoover wrote a memo to LBJ in which he requested LBJ to issue "something" that would lead the suckers, ( who were in the dark and pleading for answers in the violent murder of their President ), into believing that one hapless, deranged soul, murdered President Kennedy for no reason at all.   At the time, November 24 1963, Hoover had NO, ( None, Nada , ZIP ) solid evidence that Lee Oswald was in fact the assassin....  But he was desperate to get on with the postmortem execution of the dead Oswald ......
« Last Edit: December 09, 2018, 04:18:22 PM by Walt Cakebread »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: "We have developed no evidence"....
« Reply #31 on: December 08, 2018, 02:53:13 PM »

 

Mobile View