Author Topic: Why Oswald Would Have Removed The Scope From The Rifle  (Read 34446 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Bob Prudhomme

  • Super Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 867
Why Oswald Would Have Removed The Scope From The Rifle
« on: March 19, 2017, 02:43:56 PM »
Everyone knows that the assassination rifle was found on the 6th floor of the TSBD with a telescopic sight mounted on it, and it is assumed that Oswald used this telescopic sight for at least one of the shots. What is not commonly known is the type and quality of this scope, the type and quality of the scope mount, the quality of the work in mounting the scope to the rifle and how all of these factors would affect the sighting in of this telescopic sight plus the ability of this telescopic sight to remain sighted in any longer than the next successive shot.

Using testimonial evidence presented to the Warren Commission, I will show why Oswald, who had rifle training in the USMC but who was never trained in the use and maintenance of a telescopic rifle sight, would have quickly become frustrated with the gross deficiencies of the telescopic sight on C2766, and would have removed the telescopic sight and mount from this rifle long before 22/11/63.
"Mr. HILL. The right rear portion of his head was missing. It was lying in the rear seat of the car." WC testimony of SA Clint Hill

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Super Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10946
Re: Why Oswald Would Have Removed The Scope From The Rifle
« Reply #1 on: March 19, 2017, 04:43:05 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Everyone knows that the assassination rifle was found on the 6th floor of the TSBD with a telescopic sight mounted on it, and it is assumed that Oswald used this telescopic sight for at least one of the shots. What is not commonly known is the type and quality of this scope, the type and quality of the scope mount, the quality of the work in mounting the scope to the rifle and how all of these factors would affect the sighting in of this telescopic sight plus the ability of this telescopic sight to remain sighted in any longer than the next successive shot.

Using testimonial evidence presented to the Warren Commission, I will show why Oswald, who had rifle training in the USMC but who was never trained in the use and maintenance of a telescopic rifle sight, would have quickly become frustrated with the gross deficiencies of the telescopic sight on C2766, and would have removed the telescopic sight and mount from this rifle long before 22/11/63.

Everyone knows that the assassination rifle was found on the 6th floor of the TSBD with a telescopic sight mounted on it,

Not everyone....I don't believe that the Mannlicher Carcano that was discovered where it had been carefully hidden in a cavern of boxes was the murder weapon.
« Last Edit: March 19, 2017, 07:21:51 PM
by Walt Cakebread
»

Offline Bob Prudhomme

  • Super Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 867
Re: Why Oswald Would Have Removed The Scope From The Rifle
« Reply #2 on: March 19, 2017, 05:33:48 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Everyone knows that the assassination rifle was found on the 6th floor of the TSBD with a telescopic sight mounted on it,

Not everyone....I don't believe that the Mannlicher Carcano that was discovered where it had been carefully in a cavern of boxes was the murder weapon.

Understood. I'll begin calling it the alleged assassination rifle from here on.
"Mr. HILL. The right rear portion of his head was missing. It was lying in the rear seat of the car." WC testimony of SA Clint Hill

Offline Michael Capasse

  • Super Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3658
Re: Why Oswald Would Have Removed The Scope From The Rifle
« Reply #3 on: March 19, 2017, 06:04:43 PM »
HI Bob - I'd be interested in discussion about the scope
and I have some questions before you get started ...

Is our scope 4/18?
Is 4/18 a common gauge of scope?  or was at the time?
Does that mean every 18 ft is brought to a 4 ft view?
Is it easily identified at a glance as 4/18? - or does one have to look close to see the gauge?
carry on
« Last Edit: March 19, 2017, 06:08:36 PM
by Michael Capasse
»

Offline Bob Prudhomme

  • Super Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 867
Re: Why Oswald Would Have Removed The Scope From The Rifle
« Reply #4 on: March 19, 2017, 06:17:49 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
HI Bob - I'd be interested in discussion about the scope
and I have some questions before you get started ...

Is our scope 4/18?
Is 4/18 a common gauge of scope?  or was at the time?
Does that mean every 18 ft is brought to a 4 ft view?
Is it easily identified at a glance as 4/18? - or does one have to look close to see the gauge?
carry on


Hi Michael

No, it is a bit simpler than that. The 4 means the scope gives 4x magnification and the 18 means the diameter of the "objective lens" in millimeters. The objective lens is on the opposite end of the scope from the end you look into.

Sometimes, you will see additional numbers assigned to a scope, such as 3-9 x 32. This simply means it is a variable power scope and it lets you zoom in from 3x to 9x. The 32 again is the measurement of the objective lens in millimeters.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

An 18 mm objective lens is extremely small, and gives away the scope found on C2766 as a cheap toy intended for use only on a youth's pellet gun or, at most, a .22 rimfire rifle. It also had an extremely small "field of view", making target acquisition (especially moving targets) extremely difficult with this scope.
"Mr. HILL. The right rear portion of his head was missing. It was lying in the rear seat of the car." WC testimony of SA Clint Hill

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Super Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10946
Re: Why Oswald Would Have Removed The Scope From The Rifle
« Reply #5 on: March 19, 2017, 06:51:45 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Hi Michael

No, it is a bit simpler than that. The 4 means the scope gives 4x magnification and the 18 means the diameter of the "objective lens" in millimeters. The objective lens is on the opposite end of the scope from the end you look into.

Sometimes, you will see additional numbers assigned to a scope, such as 3-9 x 32. This simply means it is a variable power scope and it lets you zoom in from 3x to 9x. The 32 again is the measurement of the objective lens in millimeters.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

An 18 mm objective lens is extremely small, and gives away the scope found on C2766 as a cheap toy intended for use only on a youth's pellet gun or, at most, a .22 rimfire rifle. It also had an extremely small "field of view", making target acquisition (especially moving targets) extremely difficult with this scope.

An 18 mm objective lens is extremely small, and gives away the scope found on C2766 as a cheap toy intended for use only on a youth's pellet gun or, at most, a .22 rimfire rifle. It also had an extremely small "field of view", making target acquisition (especially moving targets) extremely difficult with this scope.

Good post....and I might add the cheap scope was never intended for the heavier recoil of a larger rifle......

Offline Bob Prudhomme

  • Super Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 867
Re: Why Oswald Would Have Removed The Scope From The Rifle
« Reply #6 on: March 19, 2017, 09:00:12 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
An 18 mm objective lens is extremely small, and gives away the scope found on C2766 as a cheap toy intended for use only on a youth's pellet gun or, at most, a .22 rimfire rifle. It also had an extremely small "field of view", making target acquisition (especially moving targets) extremely difficult with this scope.

Good post....and I might add the cheap scope was never intended for the heavier recoil of a larger rifle......

Correct, Mr. Cakebread, and I plan to deal with that topic extensively; using the WC testimony of FBI SA Robert A. Frazier.
"Mr. HILL. The right rear portion of his head was missing. It was lying in the rear seat of the car." WC testimony of SA Clint Hill