Your Haugtiness, your point fails given that veteran LNers have always allowed that a CYA operation re FBI Dallas was likely at play.
Everybody knows there are loose-ends in many if not most major crimes. FFS though.. Fifty five years and still no evidence that would let prime suspect Oswald off the hook, as far as I know.
Hey, keep in touch and don't be shy about posting more CT claims to mock.
Your Haugtiness, your point fails given that veteran LNers have always allowed that a CYA operation re FBI Dallas was likely at play. Could it be that so far I have not had the pleasure of dealing with "veteran LNers" then? Or maybe it's simply that the LNs I do know have an uneasy relationship with the truth?
Btw the CYA operation re FBI Dallas wasn't what I was talking about, but do tell….. what evidence is problematic as a result of that FBI shenanigans?
Everybody knows there are loose-ends in many if not most major crimes. Sure, but loose-ends is something different than contradictory evidence.
FFS though.. Fifty five years and still no evidence that would let prime suspect Oswald off the hook, as far as I know. FFS, I haven't spend a second of my life with anything that would get Oswald off the hook. As it stands I am far more interested in finding out about the evidence that puts him on that hook to begin with.