Firstly, you need to relax cuz you are taking this way too personally. But thanks for the psychotherapy anyways. So why do you LNers always go there? Because you got nothing.
I'm not the guy taking it personally.
I'm not trying to win anything here.
I didn't say you were. I said you wanted to
declare yourself the winner a priori. That's not the same thing as winning. In fact, it's almost always a loss once you look at it honestly.
I am only pointing out anomalies as I see them.
Fundamentally, that's just a variation of the the tired, old "just askin' questions, man" defense. Except you're not really asking questions. You've already already preempted that by broadcasting your conclusion at the beginning of your first post: "The fingerprint evidence against Oswald is a joke. But it is more than that, it is evidence of conspiracy."
More specifically, you haven't shown that there really are any "anomolies." Nor have you given us any indication that you know enough about the subject so that "as I see them" holds any weight.
Are you so jaded that you accept on faith that it is no big deal that Oswald disassembled the rifle, placed it into the bag, smuggled it into the TSBD, removed it from the bag, reassembled it, fired it at least 3 times, then ditched it without leaving a single print on the rifle? He made it to the 2nd floor in 90 seconds so he didn't have time to wipe off his prints or ditch the gloves. Do I really need to find some expert to tell me that's par for the course when handling a firearm?
I'm definitely jaded. I've spent decades watching any number of third rate dilettante sleuths confidently jabber well above their pay grade, only to be exposed as duckspeakers, fools, charlatans, and bullspombleprofglidnoctobuns artists the as soon as the real experts show up. Again, Robert Groden is a poster boy here. Sometimes, even people widely considered to be real experts get exposed, too (hello, Michael West!). If you want everyone else to believe that the number of prints are anomalous, then you need to show what would actually be expected based on (say) a survey of other similar cases. Just declaring "it's an anomaly as I see it" isn't going to make any headway outside of your circle of True Believers.
Instead you give me free psychoanalysis re my motives for even starting this thread. Like I continue to say...is that all you LNers got? Sad.
It doesn't take Sigmund Freud's mad skillz to notice the your internal contradictions. When you do things like complain that "...LNers are all about discrediting and obfuscation" at the same time you're trying --kinda lamely-- to discredit the fingerprint evidence, everyone will notice the cognative dissonance rattling around inside your head.
