Author Topic: +++Can Anyone Refute These 43 Facts?+++  (Read 46112 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Online James Hess

  • Super Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2193
  • Why Study a "Fairy-tale"?
+++Can Anyone Refute These 43 Facts?+++
« on: January 06, 2017, 03:59:40 AM »
+++can any one refute these 43 facts?+++
Look at all the pieces of the puzzle as investigators do. If one *isolates* each point and determines that this alone will not convict, they will be correct. But if the entire picture these 43 pieces of evidence present in its entirety is considered, the preponderance of the overall picture is quite persuasive:
.........................................
1) 3 shots; 3 spent cartridges at 6FSN which each matched Oswald’s Mannlicher Carcano. .
2) Three 5th floor ear witnesses hear 3 loud shots
near them.
3) Reports of 5th floor ceiling debris falling in
the hair.

4) Also reported from the 5th floor was the
possible sound of spent shells hitting above.
5) A man at least similar in appearance to Oswald
or shooter is seen on 6th floor with weapon by
Brennan. Brennan later identified Oswald but the WC listed his testimony as “probative” stopping short of a positive ID until later when he was out of danger. .
5a) Oswald palm print on his Mannlicher Carcano rifle.

6) Oswald's MC rifle found on 6F of TSBD where SN was.
7) Oswald prints on SN box.
8) Oswald print on brown paper bag.
9) Ballistics tests *match* Oswald's rifle to ce399 and ce567 and ce569

10) Rifle on sixth floor proven to be purchased by Oswald.

11)Rifle (murder weapon) sent to Hidell/Marina PO Box.
12)Hidell ID found on Oswald at TT.
13)Oswald pulled pistol on Police at TT after entering without
paying.
14)That pistol exclusively linked to Tippit slaying.
15) ….No less than 10 eyewitnesses either see Oswald shoot Tippit
or see him leaving the murder scene.

16)….Oswald told the Dallas Police department he "did not own a gun." (A lie.)
17)Oswald could not effectively explain to Police why he took pistol to TT.
18)Oswald went to Paine's on Thursday rather than Friday.
19)Oswald took long brown bulky paper bag to work with him on 11-22-63AM.
20)….Both Frazier & Randall confirm seeing Oswald with a long bulky brown bag on 11-22-63 morning.
21)Oswald told Frazier long brown paper bag contained curtain rods.*
22)Curtain rods never found.*
23)Oswald denies to DPD that he ever told Frazier he had
"curtain rods" in long brown bag.*
24)Oswald denies both Frazier's long brown paper bag account,
as well as his "curtain rod" story.*DOES THIS MATTER? 25)..Fibers from Paine garage blanket found in/on brown paper
bag.
25a).. No explanation of who (other than Oswald) could
or WOULD have taken his rifle from the Paine garage. This is one of the *best* questions. I got it from the Godfather of LNs, Dr John McAdams himself!!

26)..Fibers from Oswald's shirt on his MC rifle.. According to the Warren Report: "In a crevice between the butt plate of the rifle and the wooden stock was a tuft of several cotton fibers."

27)..Oswald was in TSBD;
28)..Autopsy claims the bullet hole in skull was beveled inward which is not always proof; but it was the autopsy finding. .

29)..Oswald erratic, ill-planned "escape" from TSBD: Bus,
departure from bus, transfer to cab, cab driver instructed
to drop off Oswald several blocks south of his boarding
house at 1026. (No accomplices to Oswald TSBD departure.)

30)..Oswald resists arrest at TT; fights Police, and pulls a
revolver.
 31)..Oswald cannot explain Hidell ID found on him at arrest.
 #32)..Oswald claims his head cut & pasted on (the entire
series) of Back Yard photo(s) taken by Marina - (Another lie.)
 #33).. Marina's account of the blanket, rifle, etc., casts
Oswald in an even more incriminating light.
#34)... Oswald had the *opportunity* He was seen on the 6F
earlier that day at around noon by fellow worker Charles Givens. Although Givens did not see the SN, he was in this area.

 #35)... All 3 spent cartridges matched Oswald’s rifle.
 #36)...Oswald had the *motive* Oswald was pro-Cuba. He
perceived Kennedy to be anti-Cuba.
..Observations by very advanced JFK expert Dr Chad Zimmerman follow>
 #37). ..left his wedding ring and most of his money on the dresser, ..Observations by very advanced JFK expert Dr Chad Zimmerman follow>
..Observations by very advanced JFK expert Dr Chad Zimmerman follow>
 #38)...Oswald left with a long brwn bulky package, then went to work.
39). . .Shots rang out from the building he worked at, Oswald fled the scene...

#40)...and the gun Oswald is pictured with is found with his palm print on it.
#41)… NOT ONE EYE WITNESS can vouch for Oswald's presence during the shooting (Except Howard Brennan) ~~Submitted by ***Chris Eddy***
 #42) …
Why, out of all the days of his life, did Oswald pick this particular day to shoot and kill a Dallas police officer, in full view of witnesses, unless he was in flight from another crime? ~~Submitted by Aaron Hammonds
#43)… Oswald's former landlady saw him wearing the same shirt of which fibers consistent with were found in the butt plate of the rifle.
 ~~Submitted by Dr Chad Zimmerman

Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Super Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5713
Re: +++Can Anyone Refute These 43 Facts?+++
« Reply #1 on: January 06, 2017, 11:06:14 AM »
Just calling something a fact doesn't automatically make it one.

There's a lot of speculation and conjecture in this list making it less solid than a house of cards.

In many ways this is only a bad copy of Bugliosi's pathetic 53 list
« Last Edit: January 06, 2017, 11:10:29 AM
by Martin Weidmann
»

Offline Duncan MacRae

  • Administrator
  • Super Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2662
    • JFK Assassination Forum
Re: +++Can Anyone Refute These 43 Facts?+++
« Reply #2 on: January 06, 2017, 11:26:10 AM »
53 Pieces Of Evidence Against Oswald.


Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Super Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5713
Re: +++Can Anyone Refute These 43 Facts?+++
« Reply #3 on: January 06, 2017, 11:47:04 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

53 Pieces Of Evidence Against Oswald.

<iframe width="760" height="515" src="
frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>


And there it is... a weak circumstantial case with more holes in it than Swiss cheese.

 

Online Paul Ernst

  • Super Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8082
  • semper paratus semper terrarium
Re: +++Can Anyone Refute These 43 Facts?+++
« Reply #4 on: January 06, 2017, 12:05:33 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
And there it is... a weak circumstantial case with more holes in it than Swiss cheese.

 

Off Course a John Mytton production... protect Aus.  No wonder!!

I saw it directly on the kind of titling and glow letters.

I am glad that I where also no wedding ring in several occasions!!






Online Michael Capasse

  • Super Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3962
Re: +++Can Anyone Refute These 43 Facts?+++
« Reply #5 on: January 06, 2017, 12:13:11 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
+++can any one refute these 43 facts?+++
Look at all the pieces of the puzzle as investigators do. If one *isolates* each point and determines that this alone will not convict, they will be correct. But if the entire picture these 43 pieces of evidence present in its entirety is considered, the preponderance of the overall picture is quite persuasive:
.........................................
1) 3 shots; 3 spent cartridges at 6FSN which each matched Oswald’s Mannlicher Carcano. .
2) Three 5th floor ear witnesses hear 3 loud shots
near them.
3) Reports of 5th floor ceiling debris falling in
the hair.

4) Also reported from the 5th floor was the
possible sound of spent shells hitting above.
5) A man at least similar in appearance to Oswald
or shooter is seen on 6th floor with weapon by
Brennan. Brennan later identified Oswald but the WC listed his testimony as “probative” stopping short of a positive ID until later when he was out of danger. .
5a) Oswald palm print on his Mannlicher Carcano rifle.

6) Oswald's MC rifle found on 6F of TSBD where SN was.
7) Oswald prints on SN box.
8) Oswald print on brown paper bag.
9) Ballistics tests *match* Oswald's rifle to ce399 and ce567 and ce569

10) Rifle on sixth floor proven to be purchased by Oswald.

11)Rifle (murder weapon) sent to Hidell/Marina PO Box.
12)Hidell ID found on Oswald at TT.
13)Oswald pulled pistol on Police at TT after entering without
paying.
14)That pistol exclusively linked to Tippit slaying.
15) ….No less than 10 eyewitnesses either see Oswald shoot Tippit
or see him leaving the murder scene.

16)….Oswald told the Dallas Police department he "did not own a gun." (A lie.)
17)Oswald could not effectively explain to Police why he took pistol to TT.
18)Oswald went to Paine's on Thursday rather than Friday.
19)Oswald took long brown bulky paper bag to work with him on 11-22-63AM.
20)….Both Frazier & Randall confirm seeing Oswald with a long bulky brown bag on 11-22-63 morning.
21)Oswald told Frazier long brown paper bag contained curtain rods.*
22)Curtain rods never found.*
23)Oswald denies to DPD that he ever told Frazier he had
"curtain rods" in long brown bag.*
24)Oswald denies both Frazier's long brown paper bag account,
as well as his "curtain rod" story.*DOES THIS MATTER? 25)..Fibers from Paine garage blanket found in/on brown paper
bag.
25a).. No explanation of who (other than Oswald) could
or WOULD have taken his rifle from the Paine garage. This is one of the *best* questions. I got it from the Godfather of LNs, Dr John McAdams himself!!

26)..Fibers from Oswald's shirt on his MC rifle.. According to the Warren Report: "In a crevice between the butt plate of the rifle and the wooden stock was a tuft of several cotton fibers."

27)..Oswald was in TSBD;
28)..Autopsy claims the bullet hole in skull was beveled inward which is not always proof; but it was the autopsy finding. .

29)..Oswald erratic, ill-planned "escape" from TSBD: Bus,
departure from bus, transfer to cab, cab driver instructed
to drop off Oswald several blocks south of his boarding
house at 1026. (No accomplices to Oswald TSBD departure.)

30)..Oswald resists arrest at TT; fights Police, and pulls a
revolver.
 31)..Oswald cannot explain Hidell ID found on him at arrest.
 #32)..Oswald claims his head cut & pasted on (the entire
series) of Back Yard photo(s) taken by Marina - (Another lie.)
 #33).. Marina's account of the blanket, rifle, etc., casts
Oswald in an even more incriminating light.
#34)... Oswald had the *opportunity* He was seen on the 6F
earlier that day at around noon by fellow worker Charles Givens. Although Givens did not see the SN, he was in this area.

 #35)... All 3 spent cartridges matched Oswald’s rifle.
 #36)...Oswald had the *motive* Oswald was pro-Cuba. He
perceived Kennedy to be anti-Cuba.
..Observations by very advanced JFK expert Dr Chad Zimmerman follow>
 #37). ..left his wedding ring and most of his money on the dresser, ..Observations by very advanced JFK expert Dr Chad Zimmerman follow>
..Observations by very advanced JFK expert Dr Chad Zimmerman follow>
 #38)...Oswald left with a long brwn bulky package, then went to work.
39). . .Shots rang out from the building he worked at, Oswald fled the scene...

#40)...and the gun Oswald is pictured with is found with his palm print on it.
#41)… NOT ONE EYE WITNESS can vouch for Oswald's presence during the shooting (Except Howard Brennan) ~~Submitted by ***Chris Eddy***
 #42) …
Why, out of all the days of his life, did Oswald pick this particular day to shoot and kill a Dallas police officer, in full view of witnesses, unless he was in flight from another crime? ~~Submitted by Aaron Hammonds
#43)… Oswald's former landlady saw him wearing the same shirt of which fibers consistent with were found in the butt plate of the rifle.
 ~~Submitted by Dr Chad Zimmerman

EVERY item on that list has questionable doubts
every one - more phony baloney
« Last Edit: January 06, 2017, 12:13:52 PM
by Michael Capasse
»

Online Colin Crow

  • Super Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6486
Re: +++Can Anyone Refute These 43 Facts?+++
« Reply #6 on: January 06, 2017, 01:32:54 PM »
BRW only reported 2 shots initially.....one "fact" down.

Who is Dr Chad Zimmerman and what is he a Dr of?