Author Topic: Who Can Explain This?  (Read 11855 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online John Iacoletti

  • Super Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9059
Re: Who Can Explain This?
« Reply #98 on: January 06, 2017, 10:48:23 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
There is no doubt that Marina lied about things.... It's up to you to see which statements are lies and which are true......

And you and Hess use the same strategy to make that determination -- you cherry pick out the statements that fit with your preconceived biases rather than realizing that nothing that Marina said about anything can be considered to be reliable.

Online John Iacoletti

  • Super Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9059
Re: Who Can Explain This?
« Reply #99 on: January 06, 2017, 10:53:45 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Notice the much cleaner edges on the photo in Curry's book.

That doesn't necessarily mean it's a different print.  I don't even think the edges look different.  It's just that one has been water stained and folded, and the one in the Curry photo is hard to tell.  I'd sure like to see the high resolution print that Myers supposedly found.


Offline James Hess

  • Super Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1758
Re: Who Can Explain This?
« Reply #100 on: January 06, 2017, 10:56:18 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
And you and Hess use the same strategy to make that determination -- you cherry pick out the statements that fit with your preconceived biases rather than realizing that nothing that Marina said about anything can be considered to be reliable.
Witness testimony (whoever it is) should be corroborated by the physical evidence or even other witness testimony is helpful.

What we see here daily are multiple quotes from the WC testimony by CTs who say it (the WC) is unreliable.

At some point there will be no more cherries on the tree.




Offline Neil Hamilton

  • Super Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1357
Re: Who Can Explain This?
« Reply #101 on: January 07, 2017, 01:19:22 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Witness testimony (whoever it is) should be corroborated by the physical evidence or even other witness testimony is helpful.

What we see here daily are multiple quotes from the WC testimony by CTs who say it (the WC) is unreliable.

At some point there will be no more cherries on the tree.


It's impossible to form a firm opinion on the JFK assassination without Cherry Picking. That goes for both the CT and LN sides of the fence


Offline Colin Crow

  • Super Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6402
Re: Who Can Explain This?
« Reply #102 on: January 07, 2017, 01:26:21 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Witness testimony (whoever it is) should be corroborated by the physical evidence or even other witness testimony is helpful.

What we see here daily are multiple quotes from the WC testimony by CTs who say it (the WC) is unreliable.

At some point there will be no more cherries on the tree.





It's all we really have to go on James.....but I do try to derive conclusions from things that have corroboration from the documentation.

He is a quick one for you.....both Shelley and Lovelady estimated Baker and Truly entering the TSBD at 3 minutes after the shots. What do you conclude from that?

Offline James Hess

  • Super Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1758
Re: Who Can Explain This?
« Reply #103 on: January 07, 2017, 11:10:13 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
It's all we really have to go on James.....but I do try to derive conclusions from things that have corroboration from the documentation.

He is a quick one for you.....both Shelley and Lovelady estimated Baker and Truly entering the TSBD at 3 minutes after the shots. What do you conclude from that?
Time estimations are ...well...
"estimations"
Were they using a stopwatch?
Good grief...it is the most desperate of measures to reach so far into the barrel for anything of real value.

Offline Colin Crow

  • Super Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6402
Re: Who Can Explain This?
« Reply #104 on: January 07, 2017, 11:17:15 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Time estimations are ...well...
"estimations"
Were they using a stopwatch?
Good grief...it is the most desperate of measures to reach so far into the barrel for anything of real value.


I agree about estimation of time......but both overestimating by 600%.....mere coincidence?