Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: For Martin Weidmann, re: Validity of Evidence  (Read 8564 times)

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1744
Re: For Martin Weidmann, re: Validity of Evidence
« Reply #8 on: November 22, 2018, 02:03:32 AM »
Advertisement
Martin Weidmann has made seven posts in this thread, so far.  Not one of them lists an example of even one piece of evidence against Oswald which Weidmann feels is indeed authentic.

All Weidmann has done so far is become argumentative in one instant and then accuse me of being nasty in the next.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: For Martin Weidmann, re: Validity of Evidence
« Reply #8 on: November 22, 2018, 02:03:32 AM »


Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1744
Re: For Martin Weidmann, re: Validity of Evidence
« Reply #9 on: November 24, 2018, 02:28:15 PM »
It looks like Weidmann is making excuses, explaining why he does not wish to participate in this thread.  I could be wrong, but that is how it looks to me.  I haven't been nasty, yet Weidmann is using that as an excuse to not participate.

Offline Oscar Navarro

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 463
Re: For Martin Weidmann, re: Validity of Evidence
« Reply #10 on: November 24, 2018, 07:08:56 PM »
It looks like Weidmann is making excuses, explaining why he does not wish to participate in this thread.  I could be wrong, but that is how it looks to me.  I haven't been nasty, yet Weidmann is using that as an excuse to not participate.

It's like trying to speak to a pre-recorded message.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: For Martin Weidmann, re: Validity of Evidence
« Reply #10 on: November 24, 2018, 07:08:56 PM »


Offline Allan Fritzke

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 273
Re: For Martin Weidmann, re: Validity of Evidence
« Reply #11 on: November 24, 2018, 09:02:08 PM »
I created this thread versus hijacking other threads.  This thread is not intended to mock.  I ask in all sincerity..

Martin Weidmann, John Iacoletti,

.... Or, if you'd rather, I can list various pieces of evidence and you can let me know if you accept it as valid or not.

Bill, I think he is waiting for you.  You said you would!  The ball is in your court.

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7394
Re: For Martin Weidmann, re: Validity of Evidence
« Reply #12 on: November 24, 2018, 09:24:23 PM »

Bill, I think he is waiting for you.  You said you would!  The ball is in your court.


Alan, I'm not waiting for Bill.

After not talking to him for a while, I decided, against my better judgment, to give it another try, when he said he was sincere and did not intend to mock. From experience in the past, I had my doubts about that but I aswered his question nevertheless. But before the discussion could go further, my doubts were confirmed when Bill mocked me for no reason in another thread. So, that was it for me. Now Bill is playing innocent and saying he didn't mock me in this thread, which is true but extremely disingenuous.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: For Martin Weidmann, re: Validity of Evidence
« Reply #12 on: November 24, 2018, 09:24:23 PM »


Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1744
Re: For Martin Weidmann, re: Validity of Evidence
« Reply #13 on: November 25, 2018, 12:01:36 AM »
Bill, I think he is waiting for you.  You said you would!  The ball is in your court.

I said I would if he wanted me to.  He hasn't said whether he wants me to do that or not.

Offline Allan Fritzke

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 273
Re: For Martin Weidmann, re: Validity of Evidence
« Reply #14 on: November 26, 2018, 03:34:58 AM »
Lets face it Valenti is just a troll that hijacks all threads but has no other reason to post other than to interject with unbased spume!

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: For Martin Weidmann, re: Validity of Evidence
« Reply #14 on: November 26, 2018, 03:34:58 AM »


Offline Allan Fritzke

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 273
Re: For Martin Weidmann, re: Validity of Evidence
« Reply #15 on: November 26, 2018, 05:52:49 AM »
Don't have to dig deeper, it floats! BS: