Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: For Martin Weidmann, re: Validity of Evidence  (Read 3371 times)

Offline Oscar Navarro

  • Sr. Member
  • ****

  • This Member Has Made
    A Forum Donation!
  • Posts: 463
Re: For Martin Weidmann, re: Validity of Evidence
« Reply #10 on: November 24, 2018, 07:08:56 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
It looks like Weidmann is making excuses, explaining why he does not wish to participate in this thread.  I could be wrong, but that is how it looks to me.  I haven't been nasty, yet Weidmann is using that as an excuse to not participate.

It's like trying to speak to a pre-recorded message.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: For Martin Weidmann, re: Validity of Evidence
« Reply #10 on: November 24, 2018, 07:08:56 PM »

Offline Allan Fritzke

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 140
Re: For Martin Weidmann, re: Validity of Evidence
« Reply #11 on: November 24, 2018, 09:02:08 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I created this thread versus hijacking other threads.  This thread is not intended to mock.  I ask in all sincerity..

Martin Weidmann, John Iacoletti,

.... Or, if you'd rather, I can list various pieces of evidence and you can let me know if you accept it as valid or not.

Bill, I think he is waiting for you.  You said you would!  The ball is in your court.

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1593
Re: For Martin Weidmann, re: Validity of Evidence
« Reply #12 on: November 24, 2018, 09:24:23 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Bill, I think he is waiting for you.  You said you would!  The ball is in your court.


Alan, I'm not waiting for Bill.

After not talking to him for a while, I decided, against my better judgment, to give it another try, when he said he was sincere and did not intend to mock. From experience in the past, I had my doubts about that but I aswered his question nevertheless. But before the discussion could go further, my doubts were confirmed when Bill mocked me for no reason in another thread. So, that was it for me. Now Bill is playing innocent and saying he didn't mock me in this thread, which is true but extremely disingenuous.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: For Martin Weidmann, re: Validity of Evidence
« Reply #12 on: November 24, 2018, 09:24:23 PM »

Online Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 985
Re: For Martin Weidmann, re: Validity of Evidence
« Reply #13 on: November 25, 2018, 12:01:36 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Bill, I think he is waiting for you.  You said you would!  The ball is in your court.

I said I would if he wanted me to.  He hasn't said whether he wants me to do that or not.

Offline Allan Fritzke

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 140
Re: For Martin Weidmann, re: Validity of Evidence
« Reply #14 on: November 26, 2018, 03:34:58 AM »
Lets face it Valenti is just a troll that hijacks all threads but has no other reason to post other than to interject with unbased spume!

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: For Martin Weidmann, re: Validity of Evidence
« Reply #14 on: November 26, 2018, 03:34:58 AM »

Offline Allan Fritzke

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 140
Re: For Martin Weidmann, re: Validity of Evidence
« Reply #15 on: November 26, 2018, 05:52:49 AM »
Don't have to dig deeper, it floats! BS:

Offline Ray Mitcham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 774
Re: For Martin Weidmann, re: Validity of Evidence
« Reply #16 on: November 26, 2018, 10:55:19 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
He did dig deeper: He just dug up a 600 year-old-word  ;)
Seems he's getting all lathered up...

Did you have  to look it up on Merriam Webster, Bill?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: For Martin Weidmann, re: Validity of Evidence
« Reply #16 on: November 26, 2018, 10:55:19 AM »

Offline Rob Caprio

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1095
Re: For Martin Weidmann, re: Validity of Evidence
« Reply #17 on: November 26, 2018, 06:08:56 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
BUMP

===================================

This reminds me of the Ben Holmes/Walt Cakebread show on ACJ. Aah, the memories.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: For Martin Weidmann, re: Validity of Evidence
« Reply #17 on: November 26, 2018, 06:08:56 PM »

Online Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****

  • This Member Has Made
    A Forum Donation!
  • Posts: 2562
  • 'Pristine', my butt
Re: For Martin Weidmann, re: Validity of Evidence
« Reply #18 on: November 26, 2018, 08:22:46 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Did you have  to look it up on Merriam Webster, Bill?

Is that a problem for you
Do you foam at the mouth when posting... don't go getting yourself in a lather, now
« Last Edit: November 27, 2018, 07:15:48 AM by Bill Chapman »

Online Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 985
Re: For Martin Weidmann, re: Validity of Evidence
« Reply #19 on: November 28, 2018, 10:36:31 PM »
BUMP

=================================

I created this thread versus hijacking other threads.  This thread is not intended to mock.  I ask in all sincerity...

Martin Weidmann, John Iacoletti,

Would you mind listing a piece of evidence in the case, which points to Oswald's guilt, that you DO consider authentic?  Or, if you'd rather, I can list various pieces of evidence and you can let me know if you accept it as valid or not.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: For Martin Weidmann, re: Validity of Evidence
« Reply #19 on: November 28, 2018, 10:36:31 PM »

 

Mobile View